So the question becomes When is the incremental backup marked
inactive? Does it even make sense for an incremental to have a
different retention to a full?
When the next full is done. No it does not make sense to be different.
For example
My full backups will expire x days after the next full
“A major show stopper is that TSM 7.1 does not support TSM 5
clients/servers/agents.”
One should note that ”not supported” is not the same as ”not working” which
makes this a not-so-major show stopper.
We still have a bunch of TSM 5.4.x clients and even a 5.3.0.15 happily backing
up to a 7.1
I also wonder about the integrity checker. With DAG isn't the integrity
guranteed if replication is working fine and thus integrity check in TSM
can be skipped?
Regards,
Hans Chr.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
wrote:
Hi All
I'm working on a backup
Hi Hans Chr.
Thanks for your reply
As I understand it if the DAG has more than two replicas and two of
those are healthy the integrity check can be skipped. This Exchange
design has only two replicas so I'm forced into the check on every backup.
Regards
Steve
On 27/06/2014 7:51 PM, Hans
Hi,
I was confronted him about.
What is crucial is well oversizing and separate disks logs of disks databases.
For my part, discs newspapers are between 76G and 100G.
Beyond, you will not be able to backup in a reasonable time.
I make a full weekly backup and incremental daily.
Be
You are saying there must be FOUR healthy copies (primary + more than 2
replicas) to skip integrity check? - seems like overkill:
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l%40vm.marist.edu/msg90709.html
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Hi,
Unfortunately, full and incremental cycles are managed dissociated on exchange
backups
On exchange backups, fulls can expired while incrementals are still active.
So, we have the same management class for the full and incremental
Best Regards,
Yann MEUNIER
Ingénierie - Système Stockage
Performed a restore and the customer complained that files were missing.
Research showed that the file does exist on the file system but is not
available to restore (active or inactive).
When I enable a trace and try to back it up with either the GUI or CLI the TSM
client reports that the file
Could you sharing with us the option file dsm.opt and the full path of
directory what do you want.
Regards
2014-06-27 10:24 GMT-05:00 Rick Adamson rickadam...@biloholdings.com:
Performed a restore and the customer complained that files were missing.
Research showed that the file does exist
Sure...
Here is the DSM.OPT:
commmethod tcpip
tcpport 1500
TCPServeraddress tsmbhdq01w
* tracefile HyS9FoundationServices.exe
COMPression no
QUERYSCHEDPERIOD 8
SCHEDMODE POLLING
Schedlogr 7 d
errorlogr 5
passwordaccess generate
*passwordaccess prompt
managedservices schedule
CAKDTmsU0LFa54HNEqBaaY7n7T8ofVUBT6CA7W4GT=2bzy8w...@mail.gmail.com
f5d5b1f952d14870be28ee92b661a...@co2pr05mb666.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To:
f5d5b1f952d14870be28ee92b661a...@co2pr05mb666.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
Which method are you using to do the restore?
Could you write down the commands
Regards
2014-06-27 11:24 GMT-05:00 Rick Adamson rickadam...@biloholdings.com:
Sure...
Here is the DSM.OPT:
commmethod tcpip
tcpport 1500
TCPServeraddress tsmbhdq01w
* tracefile
CAKDTmsU0LFa54HNEqBaaY7n7T8ofVUBT6CA7W4GT=2bzy8w...@mail.gmail.com
f5d5b1f952d14870be28ee92b661a...@co2pr05mb666.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
CAKDTmsWYP6JLYpW6dM6617Qtq7r56Ha1gaUK+GXcGeHVr4zX=w...@mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To:
Del,
Is it just me or does the restore command in step two of this article run off
the page rather than wrapping to the next line?
I did submit the issue in the comment section, but as it is will leave many
hanging
Thanks
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
14 matches
Mail list logo
