Here are my numbers for PROTECT STG
Server pair 1 (2*10 Gb/s link, 25km, TCPWINDOWSIZE 0, default #threads):
Max: 381 Mbytes/s- Normal 100-200 Mbytes/s
Server pair 2 (2*10 Gb/s link, 25km, TCPWINDOWSIZE 0, default #threads):
Max: 242 Mbytes/s- Normal 100-200
Hello,
The answer of development is not very helpful for small environments with basic
edition (without DRM):
Development has made it clear that there is no plan in the future
to have the UPD VOL command change the status of container volumes
to be updated to offsite. Here is the developer's
David,
We're able to saturate our 1Gbps link to our DR site during stgpool protect
processes.
The trick is to specify a relatively high number of sessions (50 in this case)
to stick-handle around the latency. We've also enabled the sliding TCP window
on both source and target and raised the
If you are doing directory based storage containers and using "protect stg" to
replicate data from a primary site to a secondary site, what kind of throughput
are you getting on the data movement?
David
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 08:35:33AM -0500, Del Hoobler wrote:
> ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v7r1/Windows/x64/v716/
Please don't help the NSA by downloading binaries over inscure FTP!
https://public.dhe.ibm.com works.
