Re: Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Richard Cowen
If you saved or still have the actlog from the time of the export check for 
messages like:

ANR0635I EXPORT NODE: Processing node RCOWEN in domain STANDARD.
ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 2 file space 0 archive files, 23420 backup files, 
and 0 space managed files.
ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 299457501 bytes of data.

And similar IMPORT messages.

Richard
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 4:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a 
different server

There is a small difference but not enough to make that big of a difference in 
file/object-count but not in occupancy.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Sasa Drnjevic 
wrote:

> > Any thoughts?
>
> Directories vs files?
>
> Are you sure the mgmt classes are 100% same?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Sasa Drnjevic
> www.srce.unizg.hr
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-10-25 21:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> > I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.
> >
> > A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all
> servers
> > are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)
> >
> > After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and 
> > copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are 
> > the
> same
> > (13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off 
> > (original=17,561,816
> vs
> > copy=12,471,862)
> >
> > There haven't been any backups performed to either the original 
> > (since
> the
> > export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even 
> > if
> they
> > weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.
> >
> > Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator 
> > Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia 
> > Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services 
> > www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing 
> > victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email 
> > to request that you reply with your password, social security number 
> > or confidential personal information. For more details visit 
> > http://phishing.vcu.edu/
> >
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor 
Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office 
of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be 
a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email 
to request that you reply with your password, social security number or 
confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://phishing.vcu.edu/


This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection.
For more info visit www.bullguard.com



Re: Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Zoltan Forray
Those numbers are as of this morning.  There has been no activity on this
node since the export started until about an hour ago (just found out the
original contact/maintainer of the server has left the university and
someone else has taken over).

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Harris, Steven <
steven.har...@btfinancialgroup.com> wrote:

> Hi Zoltan
>
> Are the  old server numbers from export time or current time?  If current
> time you may have had some 5 million small files expire in the interim.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve
>
> Steven Harris
> TSM Admin/Consultant
> Canberra, Australia
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Zoltan Forray
> Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 6:35 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a
> different server
>
> I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.
>
> A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all servers
> are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)
>
> After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and
> copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are the same
> (13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off (original=17,561,816 vs
> copy=12,471,862)
>
> There haven't been any backups performed to either the original (since the
> export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even if they
> weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.
>
> Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> *Zoltan Forray*
> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> Xymon Monitor Administrator
> VMware Administrator
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> www.ucc.vcu.edu
> zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
>
>
> This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. You should immediately delete the
> message if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this
> email by mistake please delete it from your system; you should not copy the
> message or disclose its content to anyone.
>
> This electronic communication may contain general financial product advice
> but should not be relied upon or construed as a recommendation of any
> financial product. The information has been prepared without taking into
> account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider
> the Product Disclosure Statement relating to the financial product and
> consult your financial adviser before making a decision about whether to
> acquire, hold or dispose of a financial product.
>
> For further details on the financial product please go to
> http://www.bt.com.au
>
> Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


Re: Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Zoltan Forray
There is a small difference but not enough to make that big of a difference
in file/object-count but not in occupancy.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Sasa Drnjevic 
wrote:

> > Any thoughts?
>
> Directories vs files?
>
> Are you sure the mgmt classes are 100% same?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Sasa Drnjevic
> www.srce.unizg.hr
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-10-25 21:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> > I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.
> >
> > A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all
> servers
> > are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)
> >
> > After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and
> > copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are the
> same
> > (13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off (original=17,561,816
> vs
> > copy=12,471,862)
> >
> > There haven't been any backups performed to either the original (since
> the
> > export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even if
> they
> > weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.
> >
> > Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > VMware Administrator
> > Virginia Commonwealth University
> > UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> > Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> > never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> > visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
> >
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


Re: Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Harris, Steven
Hi Zoltan

Are the  old server numbers from export time or current time?  If current time 
you may have had some 5 million small files expire in the interim.

Cheers

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM Admin/Consultant 
Canberra, Australia

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 6:35 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a 
different server

I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.

A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all servers
are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)

After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and
copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are the same
(13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off (original=17,561,816 vs
copy=12,471,862)

There haven't been any backups performed to either the original (since the
export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even if they
weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.

Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).

Any thoughts?

--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. You should immediately delete the message 
if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this email by 
mistake please delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or 
disclose its content to anyone. 

This electronic communication may contain general financial product advice but 
should not be relied upon or construed as a recommendation of any financial 
product. The information has been prepared without taking into account your 
objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the Product 
Disclosure Statement relating to the financial product and consult your 
financial adviser before making a decision about whether to acquire, hold or 
dispose of a financial product. 

For further details on the financial product please go to http://www.bt.com.au 

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.


Re: Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Sasa Drnjevic
> Any thoughts?

Directories vs files?

Are you sure the mgmt classes are 100% same?


Regards.

--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr





On 2017-10-25 21:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.
>
> A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all servers
> are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)
>
> After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and
> copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are the same
> (13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off (original=17,561,816 vs
> copy=12,471,862)
>
> There haven't been any backups performed to either the original (since the
> export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even if they
> weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.
>
> Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> *Zoltan Forray*
> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> Xymon Monitor Administrator
> VMware Administrator
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> www.ucc.vcu.edu
> zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
>


Huge differences in file count after exporting node to a different server

2017-10-25 Thread Zoltan Forray
I am curious if anyone has seen anything like this.

A node was exported (filedata=all) from one server to another (all servers
are 7.1.7.300 RHEL)

After successful completion (took a week due to 6TB+ to process) and
copypool backups on the new server, the Total Occupancy counts are the same
(13.52TB).  However, the file counts are waaay off (original=17,561,816 vs
copy=12,471,862)

There haven't been any backups performed to either the original (since the
export) or new node. Policies are the same on both servers and even if they
weren't, that wouldn't explain the same occupancy size/total.

Neither server runs dedup (DISK based storage volumes).

Any thoughts?

--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


Re: DP for MySAP Maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Zoltan Forray
Sorry for the confusion. IBM has been putting up a lot of walls lately
(e.g. my tape drive firmware was on FTP) so you have to pay/go through
Passport.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM <
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:

> Hi Zoltan!
> Patches yes, but maintenance releases seem to be gone...
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Zoltan Forray
> Sent: dinsdag 24 oktober 2017 19:08
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: DP for MySAP Maintenance releases
>
> I just went to:
> ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com//storage/tivoli-storage-
> management/patches/tivoli-data-protection/r3
>  and there are 7-sub-directories labeleled v6211, v6301.to v7131.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM <
> eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > Does anybody know what happened to the ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/
> > storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/r
> > 3 directory? It seems to be gone for quite a while, so no Data
> > Protection for MySAP maintenance releases are available for download
> > anymore?
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> > 
> > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
> > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the
> > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and
> > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly
> > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by
> > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
> this message.
> >
> > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or
> > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete
> > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any
> delay in receipt.
> > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
> > Dutch
> > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
> > registered number 33014286
> > 
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Zoltan Forray*
> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon
> Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu -
> 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable
> organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your
> password, social security number or confidential personal information. For
> more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
> you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
> any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
> action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
> be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
> sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
> of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
> number 33014286
> 
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


Re: Directory-Container Pool

2017-10-25 Thread Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Hi Murat!
Just wait a few hours. There is some lag before the data is removed from the 
containers.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Murat 
ÖRDEKBAY
Sent: woensdag 25 oktober 2017 17:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Directory-Container Pool

Hi colleagues,

I have Spectrum Protect server 8.1.2.  I have a backup on directory-container 
storage pool.
Then I deleted filespace where disk backup is located.  But it still takes up 
space on the directory-xontainer atorage pool. Reusedelay=0 What should i do to 
delete from containers or data in directory storage pool...

Thank you in advance for your answers.

Murat

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286



Directory-Container Pool

2017-10-25 Thread Murat ÖRDEKBAY
Hi colleagues,

I have Spectrum Protect server 8.1.2.  I have a backup on directory-container 
storage pool.
Then I deleted filespace where disk backup is located.  But it still takes up 
space on the directory-xontainer atorage pool. Reusedelay=0
What should i do to delete from containers or data in directory storage pool...

Thank you in advance for your answers.

Murat


Re: DP for MySAP Maintenance releases

2017-10-25 Thread Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Hi Zoltan!
Patches yes, but maintenance releases seem to be gone...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: dinsdag 24 oktober 2017 19:08
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DP for MySAP Maintenance releases

I just went to:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com//storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/tivoli-data-protection/r3
 and there are 7-sub-directories labeleled v6211, v6301.to v7131.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < 
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> Does anybody know what happened to the ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/
> storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/r
> 3 directory? It seems to be gone for quite a while, so no Data 
> Protection for MySAP maintenance releases are available for download 
> anymore?
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
> message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
> in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor 
Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office 
of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be 
a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email 
to request that you reply with your password, social security number or 
confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://phishing.vcu.edu/

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286