Re: move container performance
Hi Eric, I've personnally seen very decent performance from 50 to 120 MB/s for each container/move process. That allowed to move more than 70 TB in one single day (with about 20 containers moved concurrently, from 20 directories/filesystems. What are your numbers ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Mai 2021 17:42:12 Objet: [ADSM-L] move container performance Hi everybody, I need to move a lot of containers to empty a filesystem. The LUN used by this filesystem will be moved to a new SP server afterwards. The issue is that the move container process is soo slooow... At the current rate it will take me weeks to empty one single filesystem (13.42 TB). Running multiple move containers in parallel doesn't seem to help, they all just run longer. Has anybody struggled with this too and maybe found a solution? Thanks for any help! Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage & Backup For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: WORM Azure blob for cloud container pool
Hi Del, Do we agree that you refer to retention sets "hold"? Thanks -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Del Hoobler" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 1 Mars 2021 19:39:37 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] WORM Azure blob for cloud container pool Hi Matt, Spectrum Protect does not support object storage object lock yet. It's on the roadmap. You can look at Retention Sets "lock" to help with this requirement. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/01/2021 11:28:53 AM: > From: Matthew McGeary > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 03/01/2021 11:29 AM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] WORM Azure blob for cloud container pool > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Hey folks, > > We’re implementing time-based retention for Azure blobs on our Plus > deployment for ransomware protection but I don’t see similar > language in the Spectrum Protect documentation for cloud container > pools. Has anyone implemented a cloud container pool on a cloud > blob with WORM style retention rules? Is it possible or will it > cause issues with either writing to the objects or cloud container > reclamation? > > Thanks, > > - > Matthew McGeary > Service Delivery Manager / Solutions Architect > Data Center & Network Management, Nutrien IT > T: (306) 933-8921 > www.nutrien.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=http-3A__www.nutrien.com_=DwIGaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8=9vKluwsPTPOmxt99WsGbh2bFYelgU1hVS8Rb_EVeZ5A=Dl_nFNRAJF1aPGQjvTV0QwdKo6ExzgV5wAOKBZMqTYg= > > > > For more information on Nutrien's email policy or to unsubscribe, click here: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=https-3A__www.nutrien.com_important-2Dnotice=DwIGaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8=9vKluwsPTPOmxt99WsGbh2bFYelgU1hVS8Rb_EVeZ5A=zfJCBuN6YXBlzor3CJXsDofQe0kockj9Uf8l3qG6jm4= > Pour plus de renseignements sur la politique de courrier > électronique de Nutrien ou pour vous désabonner, cliquez ici: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=https-3A__www.nutrien.com_avis-2Dimportant=DwIGaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8=9vKluwsPTPOmxt99WsGbh2bFYelgU1hVS8Rb_EVeZ5A=0KJV9ZEYbu3mYxPzFZ09PG4hR5cFy_RzC9D6PntJXXE= >
Re: In which table is stored the "at risk" status of all Nodes
Hi Sasa, Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, this is not what I'm looking for. Those columns give the at risk interval configuration (see : SET NODEATRISKINTERVAL) for a Node that does not rely on default configuration (see: SET QUERY MONITORSETTINGS). My question is how do know all Nodes that are "At Risk" when they meet an "At Risk" condition. Considering there are 3 possibles values for the "At Risk" type : Default, Bypassed and Custom. What are the 4 possible values in SQL : O, 1, 2 and NULL ? Does anyone know ? It seems that's not related to the decomm state. >>---Set NODEATRISKINTERVAL--node_name--> >--TYPE--=--+-DEFAULT+->< +-BYPASSED---+ '-CUSTOM--Interval--=--value-' Protect : TSMSERV1>select ATRISK_TYPE,ATRISK_INTERVAL,count(*) from nodes group by (ATRISK_TYPE,ATRISK_INTERVAL) ATRISK_TYPE ATRISK_INTERVAL Unnamed[3] 005 1 1685 1 720 13 1 87609 201 573 Protect : TSMSERV1>select ATRISK_TYPE,ATRISK_INTERVAL,DECOMM_STATE,count(*) from nodes group by (ATRISK_TYPE,ATRISK_INTERVAL,DECOMM_STATE) ATRISK_TYPE ATRISK_INTERVAL DECOMM_STATEUnnamed[4] - 00 YES 3 00 2 1 168 5 1 720 13 1 8760 9 20 1 YES 61 512 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Sasa Drnjevic" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 26 Août 2020 18:27:22 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] In which table is stored the "at risk" status of all Nodes On 26.8.2020. 18:01, Erwann SIMON wrote: > Hi all, > > Whithin Operations Center, it's easy to viaw and filter all Nodes by > "At Risk" status(Warning, Rules, Missed, Failed and so on) but I did > not find where is it stored in the database in order to query this > status using a select command. > > Thanks for any suggestion. What you are looking for may be in the "NODES" and "FILESPACES" tables. Found this in both tables: ATRISK_TYPE ATRISK_INTERVAL Hope it helps. Rgds, -- Sasa Drnjevic www.srce.unizg.hr/en/
In which table is stored the "at risk" status of all Nodes
Hi all, Whithin Operations Center, it's easy to viaw and filter all Nodes by "At Risk" status(Warning, Rules, Missed, Failed and so on) but I did not find where is it stored in the database in order to query this status using a select command. Thanks for any suggestion. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: How to backup SMB share
Hi Genet, Are you able to backup the content share with dsm or dsmc ? Also, make sure that the user that runs the scheduler service is allowed to access the share (the service must not run as "local system". -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Genet Begashaw" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 24 Août 2020 02:51:42 Objet: [ADSM-L] How to backup SMB share Anybody can share how to configure backing up SMB shares ? Thank you Genet Begashaw
Move DRM does not chekout after upgrade to v8.1.10
Hi all, I've recently upgraded 3 instances from 8.1.8.200 to 8.1.10 (Linux x86). On all of them, I've encoutered the same issue. Tapes are checked out with a DRM command (using the remove=untileefull option). This has been working fine for year, using various 6.3, 7.1 and the 8.1 server versions. Starting after the upgrade to 8.1.10, the checkout command (launched by move drmedia) now behaves as if we were using a remove=no option : tapes stay in their storage slots and are not move to the bulk (as they should The curent workaround is to checkin (search=yes) those tapes again and then chekout them (remove=bulk). Note that the issue seems to have been solved for 2 of the 3 instances by updating lin_tape to the latest level but the same is inefficient for one of the instance. No clue in actlog ou lin_tape logs... Any idea on where to look at ? Thanks. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: R: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server
Hi Tom, As advised by Andreas, I've changed the ALLOWDESAUTH server option to YES (it now defaults to NO with 8.1.10) and it allowed my old clients to connect againt (including one 5.2.5 and on 5.3.6). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Tommaso Bollini" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Août 2020 19:14:29 Objet: [ADSM-L] R: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Same issue in my environment: these ba clients seems too old from 5.5 to all 6.2 clients. I found the nodes with: select * from actlog where (msgno='428' and severity='W' and originator='SERVER' and DATE_TIME >=current_timestamp -24 hours) I have tried the REG ADMIN and the use of SESSIONSEC=TRANS without resolving. I think that the only it's to upgrade those clients. Tom. -Messaggio originale- Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Per conto di Andreas Boesler Inviato: giovedì 20 agosto 2020 16:43 A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Oggetto: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi Erwann, perhaps you need: setopt ALLOWDESAUTH YES Kind regards, Andreas. i. A. Andreas Boesler Consultant Tel: +49 6151 8290-7780 Mobil: +49 163 8075141 Fax: +49 6151 8290-7692 E-Mail:a.boes...@profi-ag.de PROFI Engineering Systems AG Otto-Röhm-Straße 18 64293 Darmstadt PROFI Engineering Systems AG, Otto-Röhm-Str. 18, 64293 Darmstadt, Amtsgericht Darmstadt HRB 7833. Vorstandsvorsitzender: Manfred Lackner; Vorstand: Lutz Hohmann, Matthias Kohlhardt, Stefan Langhirt; Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Udo Hamm. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von Erwann SIMON Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. August 2020 16:16 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi all, I've just upgraded dome servers from 8.1.8.200 to 8.1.10 and it helped a lot by solving some issues. Anyway, some old B/A Clients cannot connect anymore : they were backing up just fine to a 8.1.8 server but they cannot connect to a 8.1.10 one. For instance : root@:/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin# LANG=C dsmc q se IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup-Archive Client Interface Client Version 6, Release 2, Level 5.0 Client date/time: 08/20/20 16:08:18 (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2013. All Rights Reserved. Node Name: ANS1357S Session rejected: Downlevel client code version and activity log says : ANR0428W Session 213732 for node (Linux86) refused - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 213732) I've this same issue with a couple of old clients using various old versions depending of the OS version (Old Win2K or Linux distros...). Do someone encounter the same issue ? What is the minimum working level right now ? Thanks. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server
Thanks Andreas, you gave me the right clue. Shame on me, it's in the fine manual... https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.10/srv.common/r_techchg_allowdesauth_8110.html With IBM Spectrum® Protect Version 8.1.10, the default value of the ALLOWDESAUTH option is changed to NO. The default setting helps to enhance security by ensuring that the IBM Spectrum Protect server complies with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP800-131A standard. To allow the use of the Data Encryption Standard (DES) algorithm for authentication between an IBM Spectrum Protect server and a backup-archive client, you must specify a value of YES manually. Restrictions The ALLOWDESAUTH option must be set to YES for the following operations: Automatic deployment of backup-archive client versions earlier than V7.1.8 or V8.1.2 Connecting a server with a backup-archive client V6.2 or earlier -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Andreas Boesler" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Août 2020 16:42:55 Objet: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi Erwann, perhaps you need: setopt ALLOWDESAUTH YES Kind regards, Andreas. i. A. Andreas Boesler Consultant Tel: +49 6151 8290-7780 Mobil: +49 163 8075141 Fax: +49 6151 8290-7692 E-Mail:a.boes...@profi-ag.de PROFI Engineering Systems AG Otto-Röhm-Straße 18 64293 Darmstadt PROFI Engineering Systems AG, Otto-Röhm-Str. 18, 64293 Darmstadt, Amtsgericht Darmstadt HRB 7833. Vorstandsvorsitzender: Manfred Lackner; Vorstand: Lutz Hohmann, Matthias Kohlhardt, Stefan Langhirt; Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Udo Hamm. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von Erwann SIMON Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. August 2020 16:16 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi all, I've just upgraded dome servers from 8.1.8.200 to 8.1.10 and it helped a lot by solving some issues. Anyway, some old B/A Clients cannot connect anymore : they were backing up just fine to a 8.1.8 server but they cannot connect to a 8.1.10 one. For instance : root@:/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin# LANG=C dsmc q se IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup-Archive Client Interface Client Version 6, Release 2, Level 5.0 Client date/time: 08/20/20 16:08:18 (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2013. All Rights Reserved. Node Name: ANS1357S Session rejected: Downlevel client code version and activity log says : ANR0428W Session 213732 for node (Linux86) refused - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 213732) I've this same issue with a couple of old clients using various old versions depending of the OS version (Old Win2K or Linux distros...). Do someone encounter the same issue ? What is the minimum working level right now ? Thanks. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server
Hi Eric, Thanks for tour quick reply. Unfortunately, sessionsecurity is already transitional (and has not move from this). I've tried an update anymway but it did not solved my issue. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Août 2020 16:27:09 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi Erwan, The ANS1357S error is always very confusing. In most cases where I got this error it was certificate related. Try and update one of the nodes with sessionsecurity=transitional and see if the error is gone. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage & Backup -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: donderdag 20 augustus 2020 16:16 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server Hi all, I've just upgraded dome servers from 8.1.8.200 to 8.1.10 and it helped a lot by solving some issues. Anyway, some old B/A Clients cannot connect anymore : they were backing up just fine to a 8.1.8 server but they cannot connect to a 8.1.10 one. For instance : root@:/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin# LANG=C dsmc q se IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup-Archive Client Interface Client Version 6, Release 2, Level 5.0 Client date/time: 08/20/20 16:08:18 (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2013. All Rights Reserved. Node Name: ANS1357S Session rejected: Downlevel client code version and activity log says : ANR0428W Session 213732 for node (Linux86) refused - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 213732) I've this same issue with a couple of old clients using various old versions depending of the OS version (Old Win2K or Linux distros...). Do someone encounter the same issue ? What is the minimum working level right now ? Thanks. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Old clients cannot connect to 8.1.10 server
Hi all, I've just upgraded dome servers from 8.1.8.200 to 8.1.10 and it helped a lot by solving some issues. Anyway, some old B/A Clients cannot connect anymore : they were backing up just fine to a 8.1.8 server but they cannot connect to a 8.1.10 one. For instance : root@:/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin# LANG=C dsmc q se IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup-Archive Client Interface Client Version 6, Release 2, Level 5.0 Client date/time: 08/20/20 16:08:18 (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2013. All Rights Reserved. Node Name: ANS1357S Session rejected: Downlevel client code version and activity log says : ANR0428W Session 213732 for node (Linux86) refused - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 213732) I've this same issue with a couple of old clients using various old versions depending of the OS version (Old Win2K or Linux distros...). Do someone encounter the same issue ? What is the minimum working level right now ? Thanks. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Replication Hung after upgrade to v8.1.10
Hello, I've just upgraded some servers to that level and I do not encounter this king of issue (right now...). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Saravanan Palanisamy" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 21 Juillet 2020 00:37:41 Objet: [ADSM-L] Replication Hung after upgrade to v8.1.10 Dear Team Is there anyone facing intermittent replication hung issue after upgrade to v8.1.10? We have upgraded TSM server from 8.1.9.300 to 8.1.10 and replication process is hung intermittently on all 3 servers. Just want to see whether anyone else impacted. Once restart TSM instance then replication works but again replication node process will get hung. But we don’t see any hung for protect stg and it works fine. We have raised case with IBM and working on it. Regards Sarav +65 9857 8665
Re: server interim fix level 8.1.9.300
Hi, "Interim fix 8.1.9.300 did not include APAR updates." This fix is to remediate CVE-2020-4415. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Christian Scheffczyk" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 21 Avril 2020 11:54:05 Objet: [ADSM-L] server interim fix level 8.1.9.300 Hello, yesterday I received emails from "IBM My Notifications" that server fix pack 8.1.9.300 appeared, but I cannot find anywhere what changed? Document https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/1275274 has the download links and document https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/1171654 says "Interim fix 8.1.9.300 did not include APAR updates." So, what's new and is it important? Furthermore I have some of my servers running at level 8.1.9.100 which is withdrawn from the ftp server, why? Is it save to run 8.1.9.100 or should I update asap? Could someone from IBM give a comment on this, thank you very much! Kind regards, Christian -- Dr. Christian Scheffczyk Philipps-Universität, Hochschulrechenzentrum (HRZ) Hans-Meerwein-Straße 6, Raum 05A06, D-35043 Marburg Fon: +49 (0)6421 28-23519, Fax: +49 (0)6421 28-26994
Re: Error in OC for device class
Hi Eric, When there is no Storage Pool associated with a FILE Device Class, the following parameters are considered to trigger a warning or error status : - maxcapacity (device class parameter) - mountlimit (device class parameter) - available space (in the filesystem pointed by the directory device class parameter) - DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_[W|E] (statusthresholds) maxcapacity * mountlimit should not exceed the status thresholds. I generally adjust the mountlimit parameter value to avoir crossing the threshold. PS : I'm pretty there was a technote describing this in the past, but I've been unable to find it. Here's another one, describing a similar issue : https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/file-devclass-reported-warning-operations-center -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Mars 2020 12:57:44 Objet: [ADSM-L] Error in OC for device class Hi guys, In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with a device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q monitorstatus status=error, the following error is listed: Server Name Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element Element String Element State Numeric ValueValue --- --- --- --- --- --- --- AMSE418-03-2020 NON-SHARED DBBACKUP 50 ERROR 12:44:09 FILE DEV PERCENTAGE SCRATCH VOLUMES UNALLOCATABLE This device class is used for database backup only and has no storagepool connected, so that's why there is no percentage of scratch volumes available. Anybody know how to solve this error? Thanks for your help in advance! Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage & Backup For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Operations Center custom report column width
Hi Eric, You should play with substr and cas. Look at those samples : https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/Custom%20Report%20Examples @IBM Will all this usefull "wiki" content be accessible somewhere elese when developerworks will be shutdown at the end of March ? Or will it be lost for ever ? Thanks ! -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 3 Mars 2020 10:30:31 Objet: [ADSM-L] Operations Center custom report column width Hi guys, I'm trying to port our reports from the good old TSM Operational Reporter to the SP Operations Center. I created some custom reports, but the output is quite ugly because of the column width. For instance, a node name with a dash in the name is cut off and displayed across two lines, which makes the output far less easy to read. Has anybody found a solution for this? Thank you very much for your help in advance! Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage & Backup For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Incorrect ANR3672E
Hi Ailbhe, Deleting the corresponding alert was my first idea but I was wondering if there wasn't a smarter way. Thanks for the suggestion. Since i applied the "allowfasp no" option, I didn't get ANR3672E anymore. Considering the alert triggers management, I think it would usefull to be able to enable/disable an alert trigger, and not only define/delete it. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Ailbhe Cashell" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Février 2020 09:34:17 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Hi Ewann, Thanks for your message. I'm very glad to help ; ) I got one other piece of information to share in relation to your query. There is another option you can use to quieten those messages. Might be worth keeping a note of this command for future reference. To stop receiving the message ANR3672E, issue the following server command: delete alerttrigger anr3672e Thank you again, Ailbhe From: Erwann SIMON To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 19/02/2020 21:50 Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Ailbhe, I've run the command on all the servers involve in the replication pairs. I'll keep you updated. Thanks for your concern and advice. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Ailbhe Cashell" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Février 2020 10:11:36 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Hi Erwann, Thanks for your query. We did some investigations and can now recommend this action to suppress the message. To prevent the server from checking whether Aspera FASP is initialized, run the following command on the server: setopt allowfasp no Let us know if there is anything else we can help with. Many thanks, Ailbhe Cashell -------- From:Erwann SIMON To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date:18/02/2020 11:13 Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all, I'm running Node Replication between some servers at 8.1.8.200 level (previously 8.1.7.000) on Linux x86_64. I'm often the following message that triggers an alert : ANR3672E The license file that is required to enable Aspera Fast Adaptive Secure Protocol (FASP) technology was not found on the localhost server. It seems to me to be incorrect since FASP has never been used or tested, and no configuration or command usage reflects that. Does I have to simply ignore this message and delete the corresponding alert. Note regarding alerts : I think that it would be usefull if we could enable or diable an alerttrigger (in addition to simply delete it). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Incorrect ANR3672E
Hi Ailbhe, I've run the command on all the servers involve in the replication pairs. I'll keep you updated. Thanks for your concern and advice. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Ailbhe Cashell" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Février 2020 10:11:36 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Hi Erwann, Thanks for your query. We did some investigations and can now recommend this action to suppress the message. To prevent the server from checking whether Aspera FASP is initialized, run the following command on the server: setopt allowfasp no Let us know if there is anything else we can help with. Many thanks, Ailbhe Cashell From: Erwann SIMON To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 18/02/2020 11:13 Subject:[EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] Incorrect ANR3672E Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all, I'm running Node Replication between some servers at 8.1.8.200 level (previously 8.1.7.000) on Linux x86_64. I'm often the following message that triggers an alert : ANR3672E The license file that is required to enable Aspera Fast Adaptive Secure Protocol (FASP) technology was not found on the localhost server. It seems to me to be incorrect since FASP has never been used or tested, and no configuration or command usage reflects that. Does I have to simply ignore this message and delete the corresponding alert. Note regarding alerts : I think that it would be usefull if we could enable or diable an alerttrigger (in addition to simply delete it). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Incorrect ANR3672E
Hi all, I'm running Node Replication between some servers at 8.1.8.200 level (previously 8.1.7.000) on Linux x86_64. I'm often the following message that triggers an alert : ANR3672E The license file that is required to enable Aspera Fast Adaptive Secure Protocol (FASP) technology was not found on the localhost server. It seems to me to be incorrect since FASP has never been used or tested, and no configuration or command usage reflects that. Does I have to simply ignore this message and delete the corresponding alert. Note regarding alerts : I think that it would be usefull if we could enable or diable an alerttrigger (in addition to simply delete it). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
Thanks Del for your feedback.
I think that demands for this hack will increase with the customer needs to
renew their storage subsystems.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: "Del Hoobler"
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Lundi 17 Février 2020 20:52:16
Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
We only see this request coming up on occasion ... mostly for the use case
outlined in this post. We do have this in our backlog, but it hasn't hit
peak demand yet to target it for delivery. For now, the scripting/macro
method outlined below is what IBM recommends.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/13/2020
09:22:35 AM:
> From: Erwann SIMON
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 02/13/2020 09:23 AM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Moving all containers from one storage to a new
one
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Hallo Michael,
>
> Thanks for your feedback !
> I hope that SP developpers/product managers have an eye on the
> list... Del maybe?
>
> --
> Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
> Erwann SIMON
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "MM"
> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Février 2020 12:05:23
> Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
>
> Hallo Erwann,
>
> you don't miss something i was also wondering.. and I'm still very
> astonished,that since the release of TSM/ISP 7.1.3 - Sept 2015 the "move
> container" command has not been improved with a wildcard functionality.
>
> Like the "select" approach you already suggested:
>
> In my ISP Update Workshop I've included a "select" and a "TSM/ISP
> script" exercise which helps to overcome the current "one container
> move" restriction.
>
> Although you know of course how to do it by yourself, may be that
> helps a little bit and may be it is a "trigger" for the TSM/ISP
> developers to improve the move container command.
>
>
> move all container files from one directory to another.
>
> 1.) select:
>
> select 'move container ' ,CONTAINER_NAME, ' defrag=no
> stgpooldirectory=c:\TARGET_DIR' from CONTAINERS where
> upper(STGPOOL_NAME)='YOUR_STORAGEPOOL' and
> upper(STGPOOLDIR_NAME)='C:\SOURCE_DIR' > c:\move_container.mac
>
>
>
> 2.) TSM/ISP Script with variables - just an example...:
>
> del script mc
> def script mc desc='Create all Move container commands from one
stgpooldir to
> another one'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* Script Name: MC */'
> upd script mc '/* Description: Move all Containers from one */'
> upd script mc '/* Author M. Malitz January 2017*/'
> upd script mc '/* add defrag=no January 2019*/'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* Parameter 1: Source stgpool directory */'
> upd script mc '/* Parameter 2: In which storage pool */'
> upd script mc '/* Parameter 3: Target stgpool directory */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* Example: run mc c:dir1 cont_b2 c:\dir2 > c:\out.mac
*/'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* Attention - NAME-Parameters are case sensitive */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> upd script mc '/* */'
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Source Directory is: $1" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Storage Pool is: $2" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Target Directory is: $3" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Pls use only the MOVE CONTAINER lines -
MM" '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I ".. you can also use dsmadmc
-dataonly=yes " '
> UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
> upd script mc "select 'move container '||substr(CONTAINER_NAME,1,35)||-
"
> upd script mc "' defrag=no stgpooldirectory=$3' from CONTAINERS where -"
> upd script mc "STGPOOL_NAME=upper('$2') and -"
> upd script mc "STGPOOLDIR_NAME='$1' and state <> 'PENDING' "
>
>
> best rgds Michael Malitz
> from Vienna/Austria
>
> > Erwann SIMON hat am 12. Februar 2020 um 20:
> 50 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm about to move all my containers (20+ directories, 25k+
> containers, 150TB physical space used) to a new storage. Has someone
> already done that ?
> >
> > Reading the fine manual again, I'm surprised that the move
> container command does not offer to easily move all containers for a
> directory and that we're not allowed to use wildcard within the
> container name. I know how to script a move container command for
> each of the 22k+ containers I have to move but I'm wondering why I
> have to do this ?
> > Did I miss something int the documentation ?
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
> > Erwann SIMON
>
Re: Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
Hallo Michael,
Thanks for your feedback !
I hope that SP developpers/product managers have an eye on the list... Del
maybe?
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: "MM"
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Février 2020 12:05:23
Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
Hallo Erwann,
you don't miss something i was also wondering.. and I'm still very
astonished,that since the release of TSM/ISP 7.1.3 - Sept 2015 the "move
container" command has not been improved with a wildcard functionality.
Like the "select" approach you already suggested:
In my ISP Update Workshop I've included a "select" and a "TSM/ISP script"
exercise which helps to overcome the current "one container move" restriction.
Although you know of course how to do it by yourself, may be that helps a
little bit and may be it is a "trigger" for the TSM/ISP developers to improve
the move container command.
move all container files from one directory to another.
1.) select:
select 'move container ' ,CONTAINER_NAME, ' defrag=no
stgpooldirectory=c:\TARGET_DIR' from CONTAINERS where
upper(STGPOOL_NAME)='YOUR_STORAGEPOOL' and
upper(STGPOOLDIR_NAME)='C:\SOURCE_DIR' > c:\move_container.mac
2.) TSM/ISP Script with variables - just an example...:
del script mc
def script mc desc='Create all Move container commands from one stgpooldir to
another one'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* Script Name: MC */'
upd script mc '/* Description: Move all Containers from one */'
upd script mc '/* Author M. Malitz January 2017*/'
upd script mc '/* add defrag=no January 2019*/'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* Parameter 1: Source stgpool directory */'
upd script mc '/* Parameter 2: In which storage pool */'
upd script mc '/* Parameter 3: Target stgpool directory */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* Example: run mc c:dir1 cont_b2 c:\dir2 > c:\out.mac */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* Attention - NAME-Parameters are case sensitive */'
upd script mc '/* */'
upd script mc '/* */'
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Source Directory is: $1" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Storage Pool is: $2" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Target Directory is: $3" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "Pls use only the MOVE CONTAINER lines - MM" '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I ".. you can also use dsmadmc -dataonly=yes " '
UPD SCRIPT MC 'issue message I "" '
upd script mc "select 'move container '||substr(CONTAINER_NAME,1,35)||- "
upd script mc "' defrag=no stgpooldirectory=$3' from CONTAINERS where -"
upd script mc "STGPOOL_NAME=upper('$2') and -"
upd script mc "STGPOOLDIR_NAME='$1' and state <> 'PENDING' "
best rgds Michael Malitz
from Vienna/Austria
> Erwann SIMON hat am 12. Februar 2020 um 20:50
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm about to move all my containers (20+ directories, 25k+ containers, 150TB
> physical space used) to a new storage. Has someone already done that ?
>
> Reading the fine manual again, I'm surprised that the move container command
> does not offer to easily move all containers for a directory and that we're
> not allowed to use wildcard within the container name. I know how to script a
> move container command for each of the 22k+ containers I have to move but I'm
> wondering why I have to do this ?
> Did I miss something int the documentation ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
> Erwann SIMON
Using multiple CopyContainer Pools
Hi All, The Protect STGPool command using type=local allow to protect a Container Storage Pool to 2 Container-copy Storage Pools (see PROTECTLOCalstgpools parameter of the define/update stgpool command). I started using it with server 8.1.4 and 8.1.5(.000|.100) then I was forced to avoid using it after an upgrade to 8.1.7 because after a few days protect stg type=local stops with the following message (the same problem still exists in 8.1.8.200. ANR3658E PROTECT STGPOOL: Storage pool CONTAINERPOOL is currently in use by replication, repair, protect, encrypt, move operations or remove stgprotection. The workaroung is simple : restarting the instance and the it works again for a few days (2-3). The problem does not occur with only 1 Container-copy Storage Pool. Does someone uses this option that allows to protect to 2 Container-copy Storage Pools simultaneously ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Moving all containers from one storage to a new one
Hi all, I'm about to move all my containers (20+ directories, 25k+ containers, 150TB physical space used) to a new storage. Has someone already done that ? Reading the fine manual again, I'm surprised that the move container command does not offer to easily move all containers for a directory and that we're not allowed to use wildcard within the container name. I know how to script a move container command for each of the 22k+ containers I have to move but I'm wondering why I have to do this ? Did I miss something int the documentation ? Thanks ! -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: PDF's for 8.1.9
Hi Zoltan, A zip package containing all guides is generally available here : ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/products/ISP/current/ Unfortunately, it always takes some avec GA to have it here. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Zoltan Forray" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 3 Décembre 2019 17:20:51 Objet: [ADSM-L] PDF's for 8.1.9 After bouncing through multiple 8.1.9 pages trying to find PDF versions (FYI - the menu/pulldown still says "beta", I found a link to the dhe.ibm.com ftp site but it only goes as far as 8.1.8? Anyone have a collection of all 8.1.9 manuals in PDF format? -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator VMware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ <https://adminmicro2.questionpro.com>
Re: Using same cert.kdb on multiple servers
Hi Eric, Why do you want to do that ? What are you trying to do ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Juillet 2019 09:17:04 Objet: [ADSM-L] Using same cert.kdb on multiple servers Hi guys, Does somebody know if it is possible to use the same cert.kdb on all servers? So I create one on one server with the certificate of all other servers in it and then copy it to all other servers? Thanks for your help in advance! Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage & Backup For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories
Hello, I've just discovered that the defaults have been changed in 8.1.6 (I've a test system just upgraded to 8.1.6.100) : Protect : TSMSRV1>q opt defragCntrTrigger Server Option Option Setting - --- defragCntrTrigger 90 Protect : TSMSRV1>q opt defragFsTrigger Server Option Option Setting - --- defragFsTrigger 95 I was running with 90 and 90 since my last post. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Erwann SIMON" À: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Décembre 2018 17:32:34 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories Hello Michael, Sorry for the delay and thanks a lot for the advices. I'm trying to find the right numbers for those two parameters. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Michael Prix" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 15 Novembre 2018 16:05:59 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories Hello Erwann, it depends on what you want to archive. These options were implemented to reduce the fragmentation of the containers, like the good old reclamation of sequential volumes. Adding to this, it came to the attention of IBM that a container, which got moved, should be subject to the reusedelay of the container storage pool. This wasn't taken care of until 7.1.8 / 8.1.x. Speaking of this and putting the pieces together, you may get massive amount of "reclamation", the cleaned up containers are subject to reusedelay and suddenly you are in urgent need for additional and unplanned storage space. Speaking of such, setting DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and DEFRAGFSTRIFFER to 99 disables the automatic move container, then you can start lowering both parameters down to a level which suits you best. -- Michael Prix On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 07:06 +0100, Erwann SIMON wrote: > Hi Michael and Uwe > > Thanks *a lot* for your replies. This is excatly what I was looking for. > > Did you adjust those options ? How ? > > I've was unable to find those server options in the Admin Reference Guide > and not visible with a standard Q OPT or with a generic Q OPT *DEFR*. I was > required to use Q OPT DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and Q OPT DEFRAGFSTRIGGER. Both > options are set to 50% (default). > > > I've found some words in a 8.1.5 presentation : > > 8.1.5+ > > Defrag uses a new path in MOVE CONTAINER process to read in the chunks of a > given container and rewrite them via the standard ingest path, > redistributing them in available container space > > Move Container with defrag allows the user to achieve the goals of previous > workarounds much more easily > Container defrag can be invoked manually, with “MOVE CONTAINER name> DEFRAG=YES” > > Auto-defrag engine periodically checks for container fragmentation > If containers surpass DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER & DEFRAGFSTRIGGER thresholds : > Automatically runs defrags > If % of available filesystem space or the % of container space which is > usable/available falls below these thresholds : Auto-defrag will > periodically start defrag processes for fragmented containers > > @Uwe > For one of the servers (the smallest one, Est. Cap of 12,5TB, Pct. Util of > 45%), upgrade has been made at the end of august. The conversion had been > made monthes ago, when the server was still in 7.1. > For another one (the biggest, Est. Cap of 235TB, Pct. Util of 65%), upgrade > has been made at the end of august too, then I started conversion and it has > just finished. > > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON > > - Mail original - > De: "Michael Prix" > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Novembre 2018 19:25:10 > Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the > directories > > Hello, > > and, to tell the rest, as both server options are not documented until > now, > I quote my documentation from a PMR: > > DEFRAGFSTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option > DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option > > If > > the percentage of free filesystem space is lower than (100-DEFRAGFSTRIGGER) > > and > > the percentage of container free space is lower than (100- > DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER), > where those percentages are calculated by > > fsfreespace / (fsfreespace + dedup/nondedup cntralloc space) > > and > > (cntrFree - pool unaccessible ) / ( cntrFree + dedup/nondedup cntrUsed ) > > If either threshold is met, then we'll look for containers with a fraglevel > higher than 80 to auto-defrag. > >
Re: Resourceutilization=100 ?
Hi Tom, According to the "Installation & User's Guide", it has changed with 8.1.2. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Tom Alverson" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Décembre 2018 21:47:46 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Resourceutilization=100 ? Wait. What?? What version of client do you need for this? Will my storage servers explode? How many sessions do you need? On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:16 PM Erwann SIMON wrote: > Hi all, > > Resourceutilization can now (officially) been set with higher values thant > is the past. Maximum value is now 100 while it was 10. > > How does it now behave ? How many producers and consumers can we expect > with higher values like 100 ? > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON >
Resourceutilization=100 ?
Hi all, Resourceutilization can now (officially) been set with higher values thant is the past. Maximum value is now 100 while it was 10. How does it now behave ? How many producers and consumers can we expect with higher values like 100 ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories
Hello Michael, Sorry for the delay and thanks a lot for the advices. I'm trying to find the right numbers for those two parameters. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Michael Prix" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 15 Novembre 2018 16:05:59 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories Hello Erwann, it depends on what you want to archive. These options were implemented to reduce the fragmentation of the containers, like the good old reclamation of sequential volumes. Adding to this, it came to the attention of IBM that a container, which got moved, should be subject to the reusedelay of the container storage pool. This wasn't taken care of until 7.1.8 / 8.1.x. Speaking of this and putting the pieces together, you may get massive amount of "reclamation", the cleaned up containers are subject to reusedelay and suddenly you are in urgent need for additional and unplanned storage space. Speaking of such, setting DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and DEFRAGFSTRIFFER to 99 disables the automatic move container, then you can start lowering both parameters down to a level which suits you best. -- Michael Prix On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 07:06 +0100, Erwann SIMON wrote: > Hi Michael and Uwe > > Thanks *a lot* for your replies. This is excatly what I was looking for. > > Did you adjust those options ? How ? > > I've was unable to find those server options in the Admin Reference Guide > and not visible with a standard Q OPT or with a generic Q OPT *DEFR*. I was > required to use Q OPT DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and Q OPT DEFRAGFSTRIGGER. Both > options are set to 50% (default). > > > I've found some words in a 8.1.5 presentation : > > 8.1.5+ > > Defrag uses a new path in MOVE CONTAINER process to read in the chunks of a > given container and rewrite them via the standard ingest path, > redistributing them in available container space > > Move Container with defrag allows the user to achieve the goals of previous > workarounds much more easily > Container defrag can be invoked manually, with “MOVE CONTAINER name> DEFRAG=YES” > > Auto-defrag engine periodically checks for container fragmentation > If containers surpass DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER & DEFRAGFSTRIGGER thresholds : > Automatically runs defrags > If % of available filesystem space or the % of container space which is > usable/available falls below these thresholds : Auto-defrag will > periodically start defrag processes for fragmented containers > > @Uwe > For one of the servers (the smallest one, Est. Cap of 12,5TB, Pct. Util of > 45%), upgrade has been made at the end of august. The conversion had been > made monthes ago, when the server was still in 7.1. > For another one (the biggest, Est. Cap of 235TB, Pct. Util of 65%), upgrade > has been made at the end of august too, then I started conversion and it has > just finished. > > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON > > - Mail original - > De: "Michael Prix" > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Novembre 2018 19:25:10 > Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the > directories > > Hello, > > and, to tell the rest, as both server options are not documented until > now, > I quote my documentation from a PMR: > > DEFRAGFSTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option > DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option > > If > > the percentage of free filesystem space is lower than (100-DEFRAGFSTRIGGER) > > and > > the percentage of container free space is lower than (100- > DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER), > where those percentages are calculated by > > fsfreespace / (fsfreespace + dedup/nondedup cntralloc space) > > and > > (cntrFree - pool unaccessible ) / ( cntrFree + dedup/nondedup cntrUsed ) > > If either threshold is met, then we'll look for containers with a fraglevel > higher than 80 to auto-defrag. > >
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories
Hi Michael and Uwe Thanks *a lot* for your replies. This is excatly what I was looking for. Did you adjust those options ? How ? I've was unable to find those server options in the Admin Reference Guide and not visible with a standard Q OPT or with a generic Q OPT *DEFR*. I was required to use Q OPT DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and Q OPT DEFRAGFSTRIGGER. Both options are set to 50% (default). I've found some words in a 8.1.5 presentation : 8.1.5+ Defrag uses a new path in MOVE CONTAINER process to read in the chunks of a given container and rewrite them via the standard ingest path, redistributing them in available container space Move Container with defrag allows the user to achieve the goals of previous workarounds much more easily Container defrag can be invoked manually, with “MOVE CONTAINER DEFRAG=YES” Auto-defrag engine periodically checks for container fragmentation If containers surpass DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER & DEFRAGFSTRIGGER thresholds : Automatically runs defrags If % of available filesystem space or the % of container space which is usable/available falls below these thresholds : Auto-defrag will periodically start defrag processes for fragmented containers @Uwe For one of the servers (the smallest one, Est. Cap of 12,5TB, Pct. Util of 45%), upgrade has been made at the end of august. The conversion had been made monthes ago, when the server was still in 7.1. For another one (the biggest, Est. Cap of 235TB, Pct. Util of 65%), upgrade has been made at the end of august too, then I started conversion and it has just finished. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Michael Prix" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Novembre 2018 19:25:10 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories Hello, and, to tell the rest, as both server options are not documented until now, I quote my documentation from a PMR: DEFRAGFSTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER 0-99 dynamic server option If the percentage of free filesystem space is lower than (100-DEFRAGFSTRIGGER) and the percentage of container free space is lower than (100-DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER), where those percentages are calculated by fsfreespace / (fsfreespace + dedup/nondedup cntralloc space) and (cntrFree - pool unaccessible ) / ( cntrFree + dedup/nondedup cntrUsed ) If either threshold is met, then we'll look for containers with a fraglevel higher than 80 to auto-defrag. -- Michael Prix On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 15:48 +0100, Uwe Schreiber wrote: > Hi Erwann, > > did you recently update to version 8.1.5.100, or was the convertion from > sequ. Filepool to Directory Container Pool done using version 8.1.5.100? > > Spectrum Protect server version 8.1.5 introduced automatic container > defragmentation for directory-containers. > The server checks for container fragmentation and automatically runs > defragmentation for containers surpassing thresholds controlled by the > DEFRAGCNTRTRIGGER and DEFRAGFSTRIGGER. > > Regards Uwe > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von Erwann > SIMON > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2018 15:26 > An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Betreff: [ADSM-L] Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories > > Hi all, > > I'm using Directory Container Pools on a couple of servers. Servers are at > 8.1.5.100 level. > > Those servers were using legacy File Pools with deduplication enabled that > have been converted into Directory Container Pools. > > I'm seeing a lot (a lot !) of Move Container (Automatic) that fills up my > directories (free space is occupied by Containers in Pending State). Those > Containers in Pending State can be as many as the ones in ReadWrite State > (reusedelay is set to 4 days). Is there a mean to have more control on this > ? > > Another strange observation regarding fragmentation evaluation. > > 13.11.2018 13:09:55 ANR4392I CONTAINER DEFRAGMENTATION started > processing stgpool PRIM_CONTAINER. Containers are only using 98.12% of > 150053.46 GB due to fragmentation. (PROCESS: 14462) > > and one hour later, fragmentation is higher (with no other process, such as > Expire Inventory, that have run) : > > 13.11.2018 14:08:34 ANR4392I CONTAINER DEFRAGMENTATION started > processing stgpool PRIM_CONTAINER. Containers are only using 97.00% of > 149378.75 GB due to fragmentation. (PROCESS: 14516) > >
Move Container (Automatic) filling up the directories
Hi all, I'm using Directory Container Pools on a couple of servers. Servers are at 8.1.5.100 level. Those servers were using legacy File Pools with deduplication enabled that have been converted into Directory Container Pools. I'm seeing a lot (a lot !) of Move Container (Automatic) that fills up my directories (free space is occupied by Containers in Pending State). Those Containers in Pending State can be as many as the ones in ReadWrite State (reusedelay is set to 4 days). Is there a mean to have more control on this ? Another strange observation regarding fragmentation evaluation. 13.11.2018 13:09:55 ANR4392I CONTAINER DEFRAGMENTATION started processing stgpool PRIM_CONTAINER. Containers are only using 98.12% of 150053.46 GB due to fragmentation. (PROCESS: 14462) and one hour later, fragmentation is higher (with no other process, such as Expire Inventory, that have run) : 13.11.2018 14:08:34 ANR4392I CONTAINER DEFRAGMENTATION started processing stgpool PRIM_CONTAINER. Containers are only using 97.00% of 149378.75 GB due to fragmentation. (PROCESS: 14516) -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: TS4300 / EMC ML3 usage with TSM 7.1.7 ?
Hi Luc, According to this web page below, Dell EMC ML3 requires Spectrum Protect 8.1.2 (and IBM Device Driver, aka Atape.driver for the library itself). It's the same requirement for IBM TS4300. https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10716993#LTO%20Tape%20Libraries To be honest, I've configured once a TS4300 whith TSM 7.1.7 on Windows 2012R2 and it worked. The gap between the guy who sells and the other one who does the job... I don't know with AIX, but it should be the same. PS : Please say hello to David G. and Olivier S. for me. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Luc Michaud [Analyste principal - environnement AIX]" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 29 Octobre 2018 14:14:29 Objet: [ADSM-L] TS4300 / EMC ML3 usage with TSM 7.1.7 ? We looking into replacing our old IBM TS3310 FC LTO4 library with a DELL/EMC ML3 (OEM of IBM TS4300) with FC LTO-7 drives. We are at TSM 7.1.7 on AIX 7.1. Do we need to upgrade TSM to at least v8.1.2 or are we ok with TSM 7.1.7 ? Luc
Re: Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ?
Hi all, I think we all agree that backing up this dedup cache fiche is useless and that it can considered as as a best pratice to exclude it since trying to back it up generate retries. Stephan is right when it writes that almost nothing is excluded, except this .TsmCacheDir directory (and system state files excluded by VSS on Windows clients). It seems that it's not an habit. Since the file has a name built frm know informations : DEDUPCACHEPATH option, Server Name and Node Name, I think it could be hardocded without any risk to exlclude any another file. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Stefan Folkerts" <stefan.folke...@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 26 Février 2018 14:26:08 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? Ha, I didn't know that! I guess there is one directory excluded by default. Thanks for pointing that out. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Martin Janosik <martin.jano...@cz.ibm.com> wrote: > Hello, > > your presumtion doesn't seems accurate to me (Windows, Linux, AIX clients, > mostly v7.1): > > tsm> q inclexc > *** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE *** > Mode Function Pattern (match from top down) Source File > - -- - > No exclude filespace statements defined. > Excl Directory /.../.TsmCacheDir TSM > Include Snapshot Retry > TSM500*/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys > No DFS include/exclude statements defined. > > Any directory .TsmCacheDir is excluded by software itself > > Martin J. > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 2018-02-26 > 07:40:18: > > > From: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folke...@gmail.com> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Date: 2018-02-26 07:42 > > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by > default ? > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > For as far as I know nothing is excluded by the code itself and I think > > this is a policy thing. > > > > Since you can install the software in different locations and you can use > > different names for different files (ie log files) IBM can never be 100% > > sure that the file it is hardcoded to exclude is the file we think it is. > > There is always that chance. It would have to be hardcoded as a sort of > > dynamic exclude like "I will exclude this is cache file that I am > currently > > actually using during the each backup". > > > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Erwann SIMON <erwann.si...@free.fr> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Rick, > > > > > > Yes, this is what I always do. But I was wondering why it's not > excluded > > > by the code itself. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > > > Erwann SIMON > > > > > > - Mail original - > > > De: "Rick Adamson" <rickadam...@segrocers.com> > > > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > Envoyé: Vendredi 23 Février 2018 12:31:17 > > > Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by > default ? > > > > > > Erwann, > > > I have client option sets defined on the server that I use to globally > > > exclude it from all file level backups. > > > > > > -Rick Adamson > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > Of > > > Erwann SIMON > > > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 1:14 AM > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > Subject: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? > > > > > > * This email originated outside of the organization. Use caution when > > > opening attachments or clicking links. * > > > > > > -- > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm wondering why the dedup cache file > (TSMDEDUPDB_servernamenodename.DB, > > > located in the dedupcachepath directory) is not excluded by default ? > > > I generally exclude it because it causes somes retries and do think > that > > > there's no need to back it up. But I may be wrong. > > > So, must we really back it up ? And why ? > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > > > Erwann SIMON > > > > > > **CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This electronic message contains information > > > from Southeastern Grocers, LLC and is intended only for the use of the > > > addressee. This message may contain information that is privileged, > > > confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable Law. This > > > message may not be read, used, distributed, forwarded, reproduced or > stored > > > by any other than the intended recipient. If you are not the intended > > > recipient, please delete and notify the sender > > > > > >
Re: Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ?
Hi Rick, Yes, this is what I always do. But I was wondering why it's not excluded by the code itself. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Rick Adamson" <rickadam...@segrocers.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 23 Février 2018 12:31:17 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? Erwann, I have client option sets defined on the server that I use to globally exclude it from all file level backups. -Rick Adamson -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 1:14 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? * This email originated outside of the organization. Use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. * -- Hi all, I'm wondering why the dedup cache file (TSMDEDUPDB_servernamenodename.DB, located in the dedupcachepath directory) is not excluded by default ? I generally exclude it because it causes somes retries and do think that there's no need to back it up. But I may be wrong. So, must we really back it up ? And why ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON **CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This electronic message contains information from Southeastern Grocers, LLC and is intended only for the use of the addressee. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable Law. This message may not be read, used, distributed, forwarded, reproduced or stored by any other than the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete and notify the sender
Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ?
Hi all, I'm wondering why the dedup cache file (TSMDEDUPDB_servernamenodename.DB, located in the dedupcachepath directory) is not excluded by default ? I generally exclude it because it causes somes retries and do think that there's no need to back it up. But I may be wrong. So, must we really back it up ? And why ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Don't upgrade TSM client to 7.1.8 on a 6.3 server!
Hi Eric, The same wil happen for every server, on any platform, for version under 7.1.7.300 if you install a 7.1.8 or 8.1.2 client. Look at this : "Interim fix 7.1.7.300 was released to provide compatibility with a future release of the Global Security Kit (GSKit)." No other APAR fixed with this Interim Fix http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995379 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 20 Février 2018 14:29:21 Objet: [ADSM-L] Don't upgrade TSM client to 7.1.8 on a 6.3 server! Hi guys, I just found out the hard way and I would like to share this knowledge before anyone else running this (unsupported) server level runs into the same issue: do NOT upgrade the TSM client to 7.1.8 on a 6.3 server. This client contains a GSKit version (8.0.50.78) which is not compatible with the 6.3 server. As soon as you upgrade the client, you will not be able to back up the TSM database (ANR4588E A database backup configuration might be incorrect) and as soon as you stop your server, you won't be able to start it anymore (ANR1820E The server could not connect to the database manager by using TCP/IP port). After downgrading to the GSKit that comes with the 7.1.6.x clients (8.0.50.66) everything is working again. So, now it's logged on the internet. :) Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Trying again
Hi Steve, I think that snapdiff is only usefull when there's a large number of files in the share, avoiding to have to do a full scan of the share to determine the candidates. Why are you using snapdiff in your case ? Have you tried the basic progressive incremental way ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Steve Schaub" <steve_sch...@bcbst.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 12 Février 2018 15:35:36 Objet: [ADSM-L] Trying again Didn't see a response to this so I'm trying one more time, cause I think someone out there knows the answer. We have 6 Netapp fileshares that have a small number of large files but TB daily change rates. When Snapdiff runs, we are not seeing the number of sessions we expect after setting resourceutilization=10. Is this due to how TSM is receiving the changed file list from the Netapp? Would we be better off forcing CreateNewBase=yes on every run to increase multi-threading? Thanks, -steve -- Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Re: No more client sessions after server upgrade.
Hi all, It seems that most of the answers can be found here : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Erwann SIMON" <erwann.si...@free.fr> À: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Février 2018 10:40:02 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] No more client sessions after server upgrade. Hi Eric, The default certificate (indicated by a * on the left) on older version is MD5-signed. TLS 1.2 need a SHA-signed certificatee to be the default. The update/upgrade process should change the default certificate but it seems that it does not. Here are the commands to verify the default certificate and how to change it. [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -list -db cert.kdb -stashed | tail -2 *- "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" - "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -setdefault -db cert.kdb -label "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" -stashed [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -list -db cert.kdb -stashed | tail -2 - "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" *- "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" After server restart, the "old" MD5-signed certificate labeled "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" will be deleted. PS : On Windows, path of gsk* commands is : C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\bin I sometimes had to change the PATH : set PATH=C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\lib64:C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\bin:%PATH% -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Février 2018 09:39:58 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] No more client sessions after server upgrade. Hi guys, To answer my own question so everybody else will be able to find it though ADSM-L. The solution was to generate a new certificate. During server startup I noticed the following message: ANR3336W Default certificate labeled TSM Server SelfSigned Key in key data base is down level. The fix was to stop the server and generate a new one by issuing the following command in the instance directory: gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -setdefault -db cert.kdb -stashed -label "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" Afterwards all clients were working again. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > > I just upgraded our engineering server from 7.1.7 to 7.1.8 and clients > cannot connect anymore. The only session that is working is the one > from the server itself. I opened an admin console through it and when > I try to establish and admins session from my pc, it's rejected with > the message "ANR8599W The connection with :37404 failed > due to an untrusted server certificate. An attempt to reconnect and > establish certificate trust might follow." A backup session from my pc > to the server fails with the same message in the actlog and with a > local message "ANS1592E Failed to initialize SSL protocol". Both my client > and my admin use Session Security: > Transitional. > > Thanks for your help in advance! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this > message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay > in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Com
Re: No more client sessions after server upgrade.
Hi Eric, The default certificate (indicated by a * on the left) on older version is MD5-signed. TLS 1.2 need a SHA-signed certificatee to be the default. The update/upgrade process should change the default certificate but it seems that it does not. Here are the commands to verify the default certificate and how to change it. [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -list -db cert.kdb -stashed | tail -2 *- "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" - "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -setdefault -db cert.kdb -label "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" -stashed [root@centos7 config]# /usr/local/ibm/gsk8_64/bin/gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -list -db cert.kdb -stashed | tail -2 - "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" *- "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" After server restart, the "old" MD5-signed certificate labeled "TSM Server SelfSigned Key" will be deleted. PS : On Windows, path of gsk* commands is : C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\bin I sometimes had to change the PATH : set PATH=C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\lib64:C:\Program Files\Common Files\Tivoli\TSM\api64\gsk8\bin:%PATH% -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Février 2018 09:39:58 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] No more client sessions after server upgrade. Hi guys, To answer my own question so everybody else will be able to find it though ADSM-L. The solution was to generate a new certificate. During server startup I noticed the following message: ANR3336W Default certificate labeled TSM Server SelfSigned Key in key data base is down level. The fix was to stop the server and generate a new one by issuing the following command in the instance directory: gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -setdefault -db cert.kdb -stashed -label "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key" Afterwards all clients were working again. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > > I just upgraded our engineering server from 7.1.7 to 7.1.8 and clients > cannot connect anymore. The only session that is working is the one > from the server itself. I opened an admin console through it and when > I try to establish and admins session from my pc, it's rejected with > the message "ANR8599W The connection with :37404 failed > due to an untrusted server certificate. An attempt to reconnect and > establish certificate trust might follow." A backup session from my pc > to the server fails with the same message in the actlog and with a > local message "ANS1592E Failed to initialize SSL protocol". Both my client > and my admin use Session Security: > Transitional. > > Thanks for your help in advance! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this > message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay > in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ For information, services and offer
Re: No more client sessions after server upgrade.
Hi Eric, What is the client version ? Was SSL activated for client-server communications before you upgraded the server to 7.1.8 ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Eric van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 6 Février 2018 11:08:37 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] No more client sessions after server upgrade. Hi Zoltan, The server is a Linux box, but the client is Windows... Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: maandag 5 februari 2018 19:26 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: No more client sessions after server upgrade. If this is a Linux box, did you run the utility to convert the cert/keys file? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEQVQ_8.1.0/srv.admin/t_ssl_config_ca.html On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > > I just upgraded our engineering server from 7.1.7 to 7.1.8 and clients > cannot connect anymore. The only session that is working is the one > from the server itself. I opened an admin console through it and when > I try to establish and admins session from my pc, it's rejected with > the message "ANR8599W The connection with :37404 failed > due to an untrusted server certificate. An attempt to reconnect and > establish certificate trust might follow." A backup session from my pc > to the server fails with the same message in the actlog and with a > local message "ANS1592E Failed to initialize SSL protocol". Both my client > and my admin use Session Security: > Transitional. > > Thanks for your help in advance! > > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this > message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay > in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Windows script for DR
Hello, You should look at the PERFORM LIBACTION command : https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.8/srv.reference/r_cmd_libaction_perform.html This comman is available beginning with 6.3. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "adsm consulting" <adsmc...@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 4 Octobre 2017 10:22:06 Objet: [ADSM-L] Windows script for DR Hello, somebody has done script for recreate TSM Server (on windows) on disaster recovery? I have some difficulties doing Tape Library creation, where I don't know device name, so script must generate the define commands automatically on discovered device. Thank you.
Re: Disable Client option ENABLEINSTRUMENTATION
Hi Arnaud, No matter the platform, the problem is the same : it's not possible to manage logs from Client Option Sets : no enableinstrumentation, no errorlogretention or shedlogretention... IBM, please ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "PAC Brion Arnaud" <arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 14 Septembre 2017 15:38:36 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Disable Client option ENABLEINSTRUMENTATION Hi Michael, Is this AIX, Linux or Windows ? Cheers. Arnaud -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Malitz Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disable Client option ENABLEINSTRUMENTATION Hallo List-Experts. we would like to disable the BA Client option ENABLEINSTRUMENTATION. According to BA Client documentation, this should be possible via client option set. BUT is is NOT. Any ideas of rolling out this change to > 1000 Clients in an "easy to do" way?. rgds michael
Re: Increase resourcetimeout TSM 6.3
HI Paul, RESOURCETimeout is not a command, it's an option you must change (or add) within your dsmserv.opt file. If it doesn't appear in your file, you're simply using the default value of 60 minutes. This option now available to be changed dynamiccaly using the SETOPT command : setopt RESOURCETimeout 120. Not sure it was in 6.3, just give it a try. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Paul_Dudley" <pdud...@anl.com.au> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 12 Juillet 2017 02:30:34 Objet: [ADSM-L] Increase resourcetimeout TSM 6.3 How do you increase the resourcetimeout value in TSM 6.3? From the TSM Administrative Command Line I have run the command "resourcetimeout 120" however this fails with an unknown command error. I have checked the dsmserv.opt file on the server but there is no mention of a resourcetimeout parameter in the file. Regards Paul Dudley IT Operations ANL Container Line pdud...@anl.com.au ANL DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely to the named add ressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail from your s ystem. Please do not copy, use or make reference to it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any person.
Re: Fun with lin_tape and RHEL 6 latest kernel
rifying : lin_taped-3.0.18-1.x86_64 1/2 Verifying : lin_tape-3.0.18-1.x86_64 2/2 Installed: lin_tape.x86_64 0:3.0.18-1lin_taped.x86_64 0:3.0.18-1 Complete! [root@centos7 ~]# -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON ----- Mail original - De: "Erwann SIMON" <erwann.si...@free.fr> À: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> Envoyé: Mardi 28 Mars 2017 06:25:01 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Fun with lin_tape and RHEL 6 latest kernel Hi Zoltan, I'm having the same problem with 3.0.12 and 3.0.16 (but 3.0.10 compiles). [root@centos7 ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild lin_tape-3.0.12-1.src.rpm [...] /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.c:480:4: error: too few arguments to function '__scsi_print_sense' __scsi_print_sense(name, SRpnt->sense, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE); ^ In file included from /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.c:79:0: include/scsi/scsi_dbg.h:20:13: note: declared here extern void __scsi_print_sense(const struct scsi_device *, const char *name, ^ make[3]: *** [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64' make[1]: *** [lin_tape.ko] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12' make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.ko] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JH53pz (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JH53pz (%build) [root@centos7 ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild lin_tape-3.0.16-1.src.rpm [...]^ /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.c:480:4: error: too few arguments to function '__scsi_print_sense' __scsi_print_sense(name, SRpnt->sense, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE); ^ In file included from /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.c:79:0: include/scsi/scsi_dbg.h:20:13: note: declared here extern void __scsi_print_sense(const struct scsi_device *, const char *name, ^ make[3]: *** [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64' make[1]: *** [lin_tape.ko] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16' make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.ko] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0jmDhV (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0jmDhV (%build) -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Zoltan Forray" <zfor...@vcu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Mars 2017 19:05:43 Objet: [ADSM-L] Fun with lin_tape and RHEL 6 latest kernel Just spent the better part of 4-hours trying to patch my 6-RHEL 6 servers with issues caused by the latest kernel (we are required to patch to the latest, every month) and the latest lin_tape driver. RHEL 6 KERNEL=2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64 - lin_tape 3.0.16 would not rpmbuild successfully. Fails with: *make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64.ko] Error 2* *error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PGuVC0 (%build)* *RPM build errors:* *Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PGuVC0 (%build)* So, went out looking and found lin_tape 3.0.18. No mention of kernel compatibility updates (as previous levels have said) and the 2-changes in the readme didn't sound like anything I needed/wanted and was engineering-speak, anyway. While lin_tape 3.0.18 rpmbuild's clean/no errors it introduces a new problem/error. ANR1819E Permission denial to device /dev/IBMchanger6. After finding docs on the permissions error that said to chmod r+aw to the /dev entry (which got rid of the "permissions" problem - never had to do that before), still got all kinds of errors and TSM server "internal failures" and it telling me the library needed auditing, etc. So we have backed off both the kernel level and lin_tape driver level! Anyone else have these kinds of adventures with lin_tape? -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: Fun with lin_tape and RHEL 6 latest kernel
Hi Zoltan, I'm having the same problem with 3.0.12 and 3.0.16 (but 3.0.10 compiles). [root@centos7 ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild lin_tape-3.0.12-1.src.rpm [...] /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.c:480:4: error: too few arguments to function '__scsi_print_sense' __scsi_print_sense(name, SRpnt->sense, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE); ^ In file included from /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.c:79:0: include/scsi/scsi_dbg.h:20:13: note: declared here extern void __scsi_print_sense(const struct scsi_device *, const char *name, ^ make[3]: *** [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12/stmp.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64' make[1]: *** [lin_tape.ko] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.12' make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.ko] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JH53pz (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JH53pz (%build) [root@centos7 ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild lin_tape-3.0.16-1.src.rpm [...]^ /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.c:480:4: error: too few arguments to function '__scsi_print_sense' __scsi_print_sense(name, SRpnt->sense, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE); ^ In file included from /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.c:79:0: include/scsi/scsi_dbg.h:20:13: note: declared here extern void __scsi_print_sense(const struct scsi_device *, const char *name, ^ make[3]: *** [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16/stmp.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64' make[1]: *** [lin_tape.ko] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/lin_tape-3.0.16' make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.ko] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0jmDhV (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0jmDhV (%build) -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Zoltan Forray" <zfor...@vcu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Mars 2017 19:05:43 Objet: [ADSM-L] Fun with lin_tape and RHEL 6 latest kernel Just spent the better part of 4-hours trying to patch my 6-RHEL 6 servers with issues caused by the latest kernel (we are required to patch to the latest, every month) and the latest lin_tape driver. RHEL 6 KERNEL=2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64 - lin_tape 3.0.16 would not rpmbuild successfully. Fails with: *make: *** [bldtmp/lin_tape-2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64.ko] Error 2* *error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PGuVC0 (%build)* *RPM build errors:* *Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PGuVC0 (%build)* So, went out looking and found lin_tape 3.0.18. No mention of kernel compatibility updates (as previous levels have said) and the 2-changes in the readme didn't sound like anything I needed/wanted and was engineering-speak, anyway. While lin_tape 3.0.18 rpmbuild's clean/no errors it introduces a new problem/error. ANR1819E Permission denial to device /dev/IBMchanger6. After finding docs on the permissions error that said to chmod r+aw to the /dev entry (which got rid of the "permissions" problem - never had to do that before), still got all kinds of errors and TSM server "internal failures" and it telling me the library needed auditing, etc. So we have backed off both the kernel level and lin_tape driver level! Anyone else have these kinds of adventures with lin_tape? -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: question about fecapacity field in filespaces table
Hi Gary, FE stands for Front End. It's used for Front End Capacity licensing evaluation. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Gary Lee" <g...@bsu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 17 Mars 2017 15:56:24 Objet: [ADSM-L] question about fecapacity field in filespaces table I am not sure what this field is supposed to signify. In the following extract, I did a Select * from filespaces where node_name='PRODBANDB2' At the bottom of the extract, I actually calculated the value by multiplying capacity by pct_util, (correcting for the fact that it is a percentage). The answer makes no bares no resemblance to the fecapacity field. So, what does the fecapacity field signify? Extract follows. NODE_NAME: PRODBANDB1 FILESPACE_NAME: /u04 FILESPACE_ID: 2 FILESPACE_TYPE: EXT3 CAPACITY: 403167.88 PCT_UTIL: 78.32 BACKUP_START: 2017-03-16 23:15:48.00 BACKUP_END: 2017-03-17 00:40:42.00 DELETE_OCCURRED: 2016-09-21 20:53:58.00 UNICODE_FILESPACE: NO FILESPACE_HEXNAME: 2F753034 LAST_REPL_START: LAST_REPL_COMP: BK_REPLRULE_NAME: DEFAULT BK_REPLRULE_STATE: ENABLED AR_REPLRULE_NAME: DEFAULT AR_REPLRULE_STATE: ENABLED SP_REPLRULE_NAME: DEFAULT SP_REPLRULE_STATE: ENABLED COLLOCGROUP_NAME: LAST_BACKUP_COMPLETE: LAST_ARCHIVE_COMPLETE: ATRISK_TYPE: ATRISK_INTERVAL: ENTITYNAME: ENTITYTYPE: PARENTNAME: ENTITYINFO: PROTECTSIZE: FECAPACITY: 25593199616 MACADDR: DECOMM_STATE: NO DECOMM_DATE: calculated total: 315761.083616
Re: SQL Instance Name
Hi Bruce, Have a look at the summary_extended table. The instance name may be in the sub_entity field. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Bruce Kamp (Ext)" <bruce.k...@novartis.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Février 2017 20:48:24 Objet: [ADSM-L] SQL Instance Name Is there a way to report on the success/failure on an SQL server that has multiple instances on it & display each instance name? I can't seem to find the instance name stored in the TSM DB. Thanks, Bruce Kamp Source One Technical Providing services for Novartis Backup & Recovery T +18175687331 bruce.k...@novartis.com<mailto:bruce.k...@novartis.com> US Fort Worth (USFW) 7001 Calmont Ave. Fort Worth, TX 76244 USA
Re: Move Data from STG pool directory to another one.
Hi Robert, I'll do the same (with a small add) : - add another stgpooldir pointing to the desired storage (def stgpooldir) - mark the current stgpooldir as readonly (upd stgpooldir) - move containers from the current stgpooldir to th new stgpooldir by directory (move container) @all : if not watched yet, have a look at this video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPyGaT1hPEk -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il" <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 7 Février 2017 06:43:50 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Move Data from STG pool directory to another one. Hi to all Thanks to all for the feedback About UPDATE STGPOOL stg1 HI=1 LO=0 NEXTSTGPOOL=stg2 in the doc look at restrictions 3 NEXTstgpool Specifies the name of a random-access or primary sequential storagepool to which files are stored when the directory-container storage pool is full. This parameter is optional. Restrictions: * To ensure that you do not create a chain of storage pools that leads to an endless loop, specify at least one storage pool in the hierarchy with no value. * If you specify a sequential-access pool as the next storage pool, the pool must be in either NATIVE or NONBLOCK data format. * Do not specify a directory-container or cloud-container storage pool. * Do not use this parameter to specify a storage pool for data migration. I think for now will be to add another stgpooldirectory to the original stgpool . To do a move container to the new stgpooldirectory. End to delete the stgpooldirectory empty. Best Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger Deschner Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 3:19 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move Data from STG pool directory to another one. Wouldn't ordinary migration work for this? UPDATE STGPOOL stg1 HI=1 LO=0 NEXTSTGPOOL=stg2 Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu<mailto:rog...@uic.edu> ==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.= On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il<mailto:rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> wrote: >Hello all >Working with TSM server version 7.1.7.0 and Directory stg pools. > >I have a stg pool with a large capacity and I want to create a new stg pool >smaller. I wonder what will be the correct process to move the data from stg1 >to stg2. > >Both of them are with type directory. > >To use MOVE CONTAINER ??? or MOVE DATA ??? or another command ? > >Any suggestion , tips or commands > >Best Regards > >Robert > > >[cid:image001.png@01D1284F.C3B0B400]<http://computing.haifa.ac.il/> > >? >??? ?? ??? ??. >?? >: ? , ??? 5015 >?: 04-8240345 (?: 2345) >: rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il<mailto:rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> >_ >?? | ??' ??? 199 | ?? ?, | ?: 3498838 >??? ??? ? ??? : >http://computing.haifa.ac.il<http://computing.haifa.ac.il/<http://computing.haifa.ac.il%3chttp:/computing.haifa.ac.il/>> >
Database impact of storage pool convertion
Hi list, Impact on the database size and activty is less when using directory container storage pools (NextGen) compared to using deduplication enabled file storage pools (Legacy). My question is about database size (and activity) during and after the converrstion from deduplication enabled file storage pools to directory container storage pools using the CONVERT STG command. How does the database size evolve ? Does it grow during the process and then reduces ? Does it remains stable ? And how about I/O activity ? Thanks for feedback -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: TSM Server on CentOS Linux
Hi,
On my homelab, I personnaly install IIM first and then put the vmargs in the
imcl.ini file (/opt/IBM/InstallationManager/eclipse/tools/imcl.ini).
The dash in -DBYPASS_TSM_REQ_CHECKS=true is required and the flag must be added
on a new line after the -vmargs flag.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: "Sasa Drnjevic" <sasa.drnje...@srce.hr>
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Février 2017 09:56:51
Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Server on CentOS Linux
On 31.1.2017. 23:25, .Maurizio TERUZZI wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> thanks for you quick reply.
>
> I'll try it tomorrow, it's time to go bed.
>
>
> Thanks Maurizio
FYI.
If...
# install.sh -g -vmargs "-DBYPASS_TSM_REQ_CHECKS=true"
...doesn't help on CentOS 6/7 (and I think it won't for the
TSM versions after 7.1.3 or higher), here is why:
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21990168=swgtiv=OCSSSQWC=E_sp=swgtiv-_-OCSSSQWC-_-E
My solution was to make dummy packages (for CentOS 6 and 7) with the
exact following names:
redhat-release-server-6Server-6.8.0.5.el6.x86_64.rpm
redhat-release-server-7.2-7.2.9.el7.x86_64.rpm
So after installation of the dummy rpm on CentOS 6 or 7, the TSM check
returns the correct output:
centos6# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{RELEASE}\n' redhat-release* |grep \\.
6.8.0.5.el6
or
centos67# rpm -qa --queryformat '%{RELEASE}\n' redhat-release* |grep \\.
7.2.9.el7
Here are the spec files for creating the dummy rpms.
CentOS 7 "redhat-release-server.spec"
===
Summary: Empty RedHat Linux release file
Name: redhat-release-server
Version: 7.2
Release: 7.2.9.el7
License: GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Base
Source: ftp://localhost
URL: http://localhost
Packager: Santa Claus <scl...@northpole.com>
%description
Empty (dummy) IBM Tivoli Storage Manager dependency RPM package
%files
/usr/local/etc/redhat-release
===
CentOS 6 "redhat-release-server.spec"
===
Summary: Empty RedHat Linux release file
Name: redhat-release-server
Version: 6Server
Release: 6.8.0.5.el6
License: Public
Group: System Environment/Base
Source: ftp://localhost
URL: http://localhost
Packager: Santa Claus <scl...@northpole.com>
%description
Empty (dummy) IBM Tivoli Storage Manager dependency RPM package
%files
/usr/local/etc/redhat-release
===
You can put anything in /usr/local/etc/redhat-release cause it's there
just to make the rpm non-empty, and the TSM only checks if the correct
rpm is installed.
Regards,
--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr
Re: new client 8.1
Hi Leif, It will be eGA tomorrow (december 9th), be patient. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Leif Torstensen" <l...@athena.dk> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Décembre 2016 11:33:00 Objet: [ADSM-L] new client 8.1 Hello Anyone found this on the download site, http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21197133#Version%208.1 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21239415 Version 8.1 Hardware Operating System Communication Protocol, Other x64: An AMD64 or EM64T processor or multi-processor based computer Client installation requires: 128 MB RAM 1.5 GB disk space Backup/Archive client (including Web client) and API client require one of the following: Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2012 Server Core, all editions all SPs supported1 Windows Server 2012 R2 and Windows Server 2012 R2 Server Core, all editions, all SPs supported2 Windows 2016 Server and Windows Server 2016 Server Core, all editions 3 Windows 8.1, all editions, all SPs supported4 Windows 10, all editions except Mobile One for the following, which are included in the base Windows product packages: TCP/IP (the only one used for Web client) Named Pipes (used in conjunction with IBM Spectrum Protect server running on same Windows machine) Shared Memory (used in conjunction with IBM Spectrum Protect server running on same Windows machine) Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Leif Torstensen Backup Technician t: +45 70253030 | d: +45 63144019 e: l...@athena.dk<mailto:l...@athena.dk> | w: athena.dk<http://www.athena.dk>
Re: Win silent install by MSI files
Hello, Silent installation is described in the offcial documentation : https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.6/client/c_inst_winsilent.html Configuration of the services (Web client, scheduler...) using dsmcutil : https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.6/client/c_cfg_dsmcutil_usewin.html https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.6/client/t_cfg_win_webclients.html -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Martin Janosik" <martin.jano...@cz.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Septembre 2016 13:35:32 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Win silent install by MSI files Hi Rick, in past I succeeded with this: unzip the exe installation package and ECHO Detecting architecture... SET OSbit=x64 reg query "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager \Environment" /v PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE | find /i "x86" > NUL && SET OSbit=x86 SET localRepository=C:\tsm_images SET component=TSM SET API= IF %OSbit% EQU x64 SET API=64 ... REM You need to make sure that all prerequisite packages are installed REM i.e. REM START /wait vcredist_x64.exe /quiet /norestart REM START /wait wusa.exe Windows6.1-KB2703425-x64.msu /quiet /norestart ... ECHO %component% Starting installation START /wait msiexec /i "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi" RebootYesNo="No" REBOOT="Suppress" ALLUSERS=1 INSTALLDIR="%installPath%" ADDLOCAL="BackupArchiveGUI,BackupArchiveWeb,Api%API%Runtime,AdministrativeCmd" TRANSFORMS=1033.mst /qn /l*v "%localRepository%\%component%_install_log.txt" SET RC=%ERRORLEVEL% ECHO %component% Installation ended with RC=%RC% You can also create "default" dsm.opt file and store it in installation package in correct path. M. Janosik "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 09/08/2016 12:58:13 PM: > From: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrho...@firstenergycorp.com> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 09/08/2016 12:59 PM > Subject: [ADSM-L] Win silent install by MSI files > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > One of our Win admins asked: > > >Do you know if IBM offers or has available a configuration wizard > >that we can use to setup custom MSI files to install Tivoli 7.1.4 > remote to all > >our servers? > > I didn't find anything from some quick googling. > I know a silent install is supported, but I'm not sure how that > relates to MSI files. > > > Any thoughts are welcome! > > Thanks > > Rick > > > > > > > - > > The information contained in this message is intended only for the > personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that you have received this document in error and > that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the > original message. >
Re: Windows Client Upgrades
Hello, I encoutered the exact same problem in a similar situation : the system rebooted ithout prompting after installing the VC++ dependancies (on W2K8R2). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Stefan Folkerts" <stefan.folke...@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Samedi 20 Août 2016 08:53:54 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows Client Upgrades >I have experienced random "unprompted" reboots performing manual installs on Windows clients from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.6.0 I too have seen this happen, RDP session was closed all of a sudden and when I logged back via RDP in it was clear the system was logging me in again and I was prompted with the second part of the installer, I did not get a prompt for the reboot. Good thing VM's boot as fast as they do. :-/ On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Rick Adamson <rickadam...@segrocers.com> wrote: > I have experienced random "unprompted" reboots performing manual installs > on Windows clients from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.6.0 > Haven't nailed down exactly why yet, still gathering info > On one machine MS updates had been applied and may not have been > restarted, on another it seemed to happen after installing the first C++ > prerequisite. > > -Rick Adamson > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Kamp, Bruce (Ext) > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:40 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows Client Upgrades > > If all prerequisites are already installed & all TSM processes are stopped > you shouldn't need to. > > From what I have seen even if it asks to reboot basic functionality > remains. > > > > Bruce Kamp > GIS Backup & Recovery > (817) 568-7331 > e-mail: mailto:bruce.k...@novartis.com > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > David Ehresman > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:31 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] Windows Client Upgrades > > Can one upgrade a Windows 7.1.x client to a 7.1.somethinghigher client > without a reboot or do all Windows 7.1 upgrades require a reboot? > > David >
Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?
Hi Andy, I'm using the same platform (FileZilla 3.19.0 running on 64-bit Windows) and I did not have any issues with downloading 7.1.6 : ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/server/v7r1/Linux/7.1.6.000/x86_64/7.1.6.000-TIV-TSMSRV-Linuxx86_64.bin But I hav had the truncation problem some times in the past that made me downloading using http. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Andrew Raibeck" <stor...@us.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 8 Juillet 2016 12:42:34 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? Hi Erwann, When I downloaded the file yesterday to help determine if there was a problem with the file on the FTP site, I used FileZilla 3.19.0 running on 64-bit Windows. Best regards, Andy Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: Product support: https://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/product/tivoli/tivoli_storage_manager Online documentation: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/landing/welcome_ssgsg7.html Product Wiki: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 2016-07-08 06:28:15: > From: Erwann SIMON <erwann.si...@free.fr> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 2016-07-08 06:31 > Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hi Adrew, all > > How did you download the file ? > > I wad used to download from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli- > storage-management/ using filezilla. I encountered problems when the > file is larger than 2 GBs (server files generally). I think the > downloaded file is truncated at this maximum size. So I generally > use http download for those big files. > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON > > - Mail original - > De: "Andrew Raibeck" <stor...@us.ibm.com> > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Juillet 2016 20:25:27 > Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > > Hi Zoltan, all > > I just downloaded the file from the service.boulder.ibm.com site (on a > non-IBM networked machine) and it looks okay to me. I used 7-zip on Windows > to test and extract the files, and everything was clean. I also extracted > it on Linux, same as you (Zoltan) did, and it extracted clean: > > UnZipSFX 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Info-ZIP (http://www.info-zip.org). >creating: im64/ >creating: im64/Offerings/ >creating: im64/configuration/ >creating: im64/configuration/org.eclipse.update/ >creating: im64/documentation/ >creating: im64/documentation/de/ > ... > inflating: input/install_response_sample.xml > inflating: input/uninstall_response_sample.xml > inflating: input/update_response_sample.xml > inflating: im32/post-install.xml > inflating: im64/post-install.xml > inflating: README.htm > SLES-114:/716server # > > Maybe something got scrambled during your download? > > Best regards, > > Andy > > > > Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor...@us.ibm.com > > IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: > Product support: > https://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/product/tivoli/tivoli_storage_manager > > Online documentation: > http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/landing/welcome_ssgsg7.html > > Product Wiki: > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli% > 20Storage%20Manager > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 2016-07-07 > 12:15:22: > > > From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Date: 2016-07-07 12:17 > > Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > Andy, > > > > I just downloaded it an hour ago from: > > > > ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com//storage/tivoli-storage-management/ > > maintenance/server/v7r1/Linux/7.1.6.000 > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Raibeck <stor...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > > > From which site(s) are you finding issues with the package? > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor..
Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?
Hello Markus, Providings checksums is a good idea. They could be published along with the files on FTP site and on the download page : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21239415 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Markus Engelhard" <markus.engelh...@bundesbank.de> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 8 Juillet 2016 07:15:04 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? Dear experts, Checksum is a great idea! I opened a RFE a couple of days ago not being aware that IBM does deliver a checksum (just does not state which ;-() when downloading from the Passport site via http. One more enhancement would be to deliver the checksum via a secondary transport method e.g. via email to make sure it has not been manipulated at the IBM site. So it´s available, IBM just please deliver one on the ftp site as well for current and future versions. Thanks and kind regards, Markus
Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?
Hi Adrew, all How did you download the file ? I wad used to download from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/ using filezilla. I encountered problems when the file is larger than 2 GBs (server files generally). I think the downloaded file is truncated at this maximum size. So I generally use http download for those big files. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Andrew Raibeck" <stor...@us.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Juillet 2016 20:25:27 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? Hi Zoltan, all I just downloaded the file from the service.boulder.ibm.com site (on a non-IBM networked machine) and it looks okay to me. I used 7-zip on Windows to test and extract the files, and everything was clean. I also extracted it on Linux, same as you (Zoltan) did, and it extracted clean: UnZipSFX 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Info-ZIP (http://www.info-zip.org). creating: im64/ creating: im64/Offerings/ creating: im64/configuration/ creating: im64/configuration/org.eclipse.update/ creating: im64/documentation/ creating: im64/documentation/de/ ... inflating: input/install_response_sample.xml inflating: input/uninstall_response_sample.xml inflating: input/update_response_sample.xml inflating: im32/post-install.xml inflating: im64/post-install.xml inflating: README.htm SLES-114:/716server # Maybe something got scrambled during your download? Best regards, Andy Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: Product support: https://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/product/tivoli/tivoli_storage_manager Online documentation: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/landing/welcome_ssgsg7.html Product Wiki: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 2016-07-07 12:15:22: > From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 2016-07-07 12:17 > Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Andy, > > I just downloaded it an hour ago from: > > ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com//storage/tivoli-storage-management/ > maintenance/server/v7r1/Linux/7.1.6.000 > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Raibeck <stor...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > From which site(s) are you finding issues with the package? > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor...@us.ibm.com > > > > IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: > > Product support: > > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/product/tivoli/ > tivoli_storage_manager > > > > Online documentation: > > > > http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/landing/ > welcome_ssgsg7.html > > > > Product Wiki: > > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/ > Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 2016-07-07 > > 11:45:12: > > > > > From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu> > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > Date: 2016-07-07 11:46 > > > Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > > > I just finished downloading and when I unzip it with 7z, it says > > "Warnings: > > > There are some data after the end of the payload data" > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM < > > > eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The code is definitely broken on several IBM download sites... I > > finally > > > > found a version through Fix Central which is OK. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Eric van Loon > > > > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > > > > > > > From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM > > > > Sent: donderdag 7 juli 2016 13:25 > > > > To: ADSM-L <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > Subject: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated? > > > > > > > > Hi guys! > > > > Has anybody been able to extract the Linux 7.1.6 bin file successfully? > > If > > > > I try it on Linux I receive the following error: > > > > > > > > # ./7.1.6.000-TIV-TSMSRV-Linu
Re: "Compressed data grew" retries?
Tom, In order to be able to use client side LZ4 compression, the server must be at least at 7.1.5 and the client at 7.1.6. Moreover, client-side compression and client-side deduplication must be used and the data must be backed up in a container storage pool. See what the client documentation says about the compression option : The type of compression that the client uses is determined by the combination of compression and client-side data deduplication that is used during backup or archive processing. The following types of compression are used: LZ4 A faster and more efficient compression method that the client uses when client-deduplicated data is sent to an LZ4-compatible container storage pool on the Tivoli Storage Manager server. The server must be at version 7.1.5 or later, and must use container storage pools. Client-side LZ4 compression is used only when client-side data deduplication is enabled. LZW A traditional type of compression that the client uses in any of the following situations: v Client-deduplicated data is sent to traditional (non-container) storage pools on the server. v The client data does not undergo client-side data deduplication. (Does not apply to Data Protection for VMware and Data Protection for Microsoft Hyper-V, in which only client-deduplicated data can be compressed.) -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Tom Alverson" <tom.alver...@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Juillet 2016 05:50:11 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] "Compressed data grew" retries? If the server is at 6.3.x and the client is at 7.1.x can it use LZ4 or does that require the server to also be at 7.1.x? On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Paul Zarnowski <p...@cornell.edu> wrote: > At 09:31 AM 6/30/2016, Tom Alverson wrote: > >I will > >try the compressalways yes setting but hopefully that won't override the > >exclusions I have set up for common compressed files. > > No, compressalways will not override exclude.compress. The option simply > says not to retry if compression grows the size. > > The legacy LZW compression can grow files that are already in a compressed > format. The newer LZ4 compression should not grow an already compressed > file. In that respect, it's similar to the compression that LTO tape > drives can do. > > ..Paul > > > > -- > Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 > Assistant Director for Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 > IT at Cornell / InfrastructureEm: p...@cornell.edu > 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 >
Re: "Compressed data grew" retries?
Hello Pamela, You should propably add the Open XML Microsoft Office file extensions to you list (docx, xlsx, pptx...) as they are XML compressed files. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Pamela Pagnotta (CONTR)" <pamela.pagno...@hq.doe.gov> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Juin 2016 15:05:56 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] "Compressed data grew" retries? Good morning Tom, We have, successfully, used the following in our dsm.opt/dsm.sys files for many years EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.z" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.*_" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pst" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.gif" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.doc" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.ppt" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pps" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.psd" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.exe" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.jpg" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.jp2" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.sid" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.vsd" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pdf" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.wpd" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.wav" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.xls" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pfb" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.mov" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.xlk" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.wmv" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.cab" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.zip" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.jbf" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.rec" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.msg" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pub" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.bmp" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.png" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.pot" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.mpg" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.mps" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.tif" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*.tiff" Pam Pam Pagnotta Sr. System Engineer Criterion Systems, Inc./ActioNet Contractor to US. Department of Energy Office of the CIO/IM-622 Office: 301-903-5508 Mobile: 301-335-8177 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Alverson Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 8:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] "Compressed data grew" retries? I have been watching an initial TSM backup running for a long time now over a WAN connection (100mbit/sec) and I keep seeing "compressed data grew" followed by a "Retry". Does this mean that for every file that compression increased the size (even 1%) the whole transfer is discarded and it starts over again with the same file (presumably with compression disabled)? If so that is probably hurting my backup speed much more than the compression ever improved it. Is there any way to prevent this short of adding one of these options for every type of compressible file? EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*:\...\*.jpg" EXCLUDE.COMPRESSION "*:\...\*.zip"
autodeploy of 7.1.6 client updates fails
Hi all, I'm trying to deploy 7.1.6 client updates on Linux and Windows boxes using the autodeploy packages from the FTP site. Unfortunately, without success on both platforms (while I succeed to deploy 7.1.4 or earlier versions on the same boxes). On Windows, it fails on extracting installation image for Backup-archive client : only a few folders and files are extracted. Manual extraction from the same packages retrieved from the server works fine. On Linux, it fails on running updatemgr : no updatemgr process is running and the mutex file is left behind. A successfull workaroung is to release the lock (./updatemgr/managemutex Release) and manualy re-run the deployclient .sh script (./deployclient.sh). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: DR test and SP 7 Operations Center
Hi Rick, OC does not contain anything, everything is in the database of the connected TSM server, so you can just have a second OC that connects to your DR server using a properties file for this, see this technote : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21983376 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Rick Adamson" <rickadam...@segrocers.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 26 Mai 2016 16:11:25 Objet: [ADSM-L] DR test and SP 7 Operations Center Didn't find any discussion or documentation on this subject so I'm hoping for feedback/suggestions. Recently implemented a two-site installation of SP 7.1.5 using container storage pools and node replication. Both the source and target servers are VM's running on Windows 2012. There are roughly 950 clients, all AIX 7.1, using BA client level 7.1.3 I have an upcoming DR test and began thinking about the Operations Center??? The OC is installed on my source server and has become an integral tool for my operators, so if it's not available for the test certainly someone will complain. The DR simulation takes place over 3 days and we will obviously be isolated from the production data center, including the source server and ultimately the Operations Center. My question is; how can I, or is it possible, to make the OC available in the test environment? I would think that IBM has thought this through but I didn't find any documented direction. Thoughts? Thanks -Rick Adamson
Re: EoS for TSM 6.3
Thanks Del, so there's no hurry to upgarde. But it's still a good idea to do so in order to get benefit for an enhanced Operations Center, effective alert triggering or status thresholds. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Del Hoobler" <hoob...@us.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 19 Avril 2016 18:15:48 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] EoS for TSM 6.3 Yes, the 6.3.x server will be supported until the 6.4 is EOS. Del --- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 04/19/2016 09:42:41 AM: > From: Erwann SIMON <erwann.si...@free.fr> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 04/19/2016 09:44 AM > Subject: Re: EoS for TSM 6.3 > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hi all, and IBMers particularly, > > Can someone clarify this point ? Will 6.3.3 server be supported > along with 6.4 version ? > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON > > - Mail original - > De: "Skylar Thompson" <skyl...@u.washington.edu> > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Envoyé: Lundi 18 Avril 2016 18:12:10 > Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] EoS for TSM 6.3 > > Given that the TSM v6.4 "release" shipped the v6.3 server[1], does this > mean that the v6.3 server will continue to be supported until v6.4 is > no longer supported? > > [1] http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21243309 > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:56:16PM +0100, Schofield, Neil (Storage & > Middleware, Backup & Restore) wrote: > > In case anyone missed it, IBM last week announced the End-of- > Support date for TSM 6.3 would be April 30th 2017: > > http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS916-072/index.html > > -- > -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu) > -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator > -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354 > -- University of Washington School of Medicine >
Re: EoS for TSM 6.3
Hi all, and IBMers particularly, Can someone clarify this point ? Will 6.3.3 server be supported along with 6.4 version ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Skylar Thompson" <skyl...@u.washington.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 18 Avril 2016 18:12:10 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] EoS for TSM 6.3 Given that the TSM v6.4 "release" shipped the v6.3 server[1], does this mean that the v6.3 server will continue to be supported until v6.4 is no longer supported? [1] http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21243309 On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:56:16PM +0100, Schofield, Neil (Storage & Middleware, Backup & Restore) wrote: > In case anyone missed it, IBM last week announced the End-of-Support date for > TSM 6.3 would be April 30th 2017: > http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS916-072/index.html -- -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu) -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354 -- University of Washington School of Medicine
Re: Spectrum Protect 7.1.5.100
Unfortunately, this one is not fixed yet : https://www-304.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg1IT14533 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Zoltan Forray" <zfor...@vcu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Avril 2016 19:41:05 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect 7.1.5.100 I got this from the README on the FTP server. Go to this page: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979249 *APARs fixed in Level 7.1.5.100* *APAR* *Operating System/Release* *of Reported Issue* * (APAR, CompId, Rel)* *Abstract* IT14019 <http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT14019> IT14019 5698ISMSV 71W "ANRD_2077889187 SMREPLSERVERSESSION" AND "REPLICATION IT14101 <http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT14101> IT14101 5698ISMSV 71L SERVER PROCESSES MIGHT HANG WHILE ADMSERVERMONITORTHREAD IS IT14233 <http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT14233> IT14233 5698ISMSV 71W CANCELLED/FAILED PROTECT STGPOOL CREATES ORPHANED CHUNKS ON IT14353 <http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT14353> IT14353 5698ISMSV 71A NON-EMPTY CONTAINERS IN S3 POOLS MAY BE DELETED WHEN FIRST C IT14388 <http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT14388> IT14388 5698ISMSV 71A MEMORY LEAK IN SDREPL.C On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:23 PM, J. Pohlmann <jpohlm...@shaw.ca> wrote: > I just received My Notification for the new patch level. Could someone > please tell me what's new/fixed in the patch level? Neither the My > Notifications link nor the README on the ftp server tells me anything about > the APARS fixed. The ftp site README leads to some search link only. The > link from My Notifications only shows the fixes for 7.1.5.000. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Joerg Pohlmann > -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator (in training) Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: container to FILE?
Hi David, I think that the only way to do this is to use the replicate node function... -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "David Ehresman" <david.ehres...@louisville.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 28 Mars 2016 18:20:42 Objet: [ADSM-L] container to FILE? Is there a way to move data from a container to a FILE based storage pool?
Re: TSM for SQL client license
Hello David, The license file generally applies to V.R, so it'll be ok. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "David Ehresman" <david.ehres...@louisville.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Mars 2016 18:44:37 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM for SQL client license Does anyone know if a 7.1.0 TSM for SQL license is sufficient for the TSM for SQL 7.1.4.0 update or do I have to pick up a new license somewhere? David
Re: Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools
Arnaud, If an object is already compressed (client side compression activated), it will be ignored/excluded by server side compression. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "PAC Brion Arnaud" <arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Mars 2016 10:27:58 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools Erwann, Thanks for your input : I had a look at the video which clarified few points, but not all of them ... One question : if using deduped and compressed pool, shall the "compression" option on the node definition be left to default "client" value, or must I update it to "no" ? I'm asking because I updated my container pools yesterday to use compression, and this morning compression rate on this storage pool is still zero :-( Cheers. Arnaud -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools Hi all, TSM deduplication is effective combined with compression. Without compression, I'm not sure that it worths what it costs (1:2,5 ratio or 65% is what I generally see with mixed data and "standard" retention). You all should whatch this Tricia Jiang's video on YouTube (from 7:11) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISWRrkY5RS8 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "PAC Brion Arnaud" <arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Mars 2016 15:41:06 Objet: [ADSM-L] Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools Hi All, We are currently testing TSM 7.1 deduplication feature, in conjunction with container based storage pools. So far, my test TSM instances, installed with such a setup are reporting dedup percentage of 45 %, means dedup factor around 1.81, using a sample of clients which are representative of our production environment. This is unfortunately pretty far from what was promised by IBM (dedup factor of 4) ... I'm wondering if anybody making use of container based storage pools and deduplication would be sharing his deduplication factor, so that I could have a better appreciation of real world figures. If you would be so kind to share your information (possibly with the kind of backed-up data i.e. VM, DB, NAS, Exchange, and retention values ...) I would be very grateful ! Thanks in advance for appreciated feedback. Cheers. Arnaud ** Backup and Recovery Systems Administrator Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01 Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78 e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com<mailto:arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> This electronic message transmission contains information from Panalpina and is confidential or privileged. This information is intended only for the person (s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use or any other action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you receive this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender by e-mail, telephone or fax at the numbers listed above. Thank you. **
Re: Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools
Hi all, TSM deduplication is effective combined with compression. Without compression, I'm not sure that it worths what it costs (1:2,5 ratio or 65% is what I generally see with mixed data and "standard" retention). You all should whatch this Tricia Jiang's video on YouTube (from 7:11) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISWRrkY5RS8 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "PAC Brion Arnaud" <arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Mars 2016 15:41:06 Objet: [ADSM-L] Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1 and container pools Hi All, We are currently testing TSM 7.1 deduplication feature, in conjunction with container based storage pools. So far, my test TSM instances, installed with such a setup are reporting dedup percentage of 45 %, means dedup factor around 1.81, using a sample of clients which are representative of our production environment. This is unfortunately pretty far from what was promised by IBM (dedup factor of 4) ... I'm wondering if anybody making use of container based storage pools and deduplication would be sharing his deduplication factor, so that I could have a better appreciation of real world figures. If you would be so kind to share your information (possibly with the kind of backed-up data i.e. VM, DB, NAS, Exchange, and retention values ...) I would be very grateful ! Thanks in advance for appreciated feedback. Cheers. Arnaud ** Backup and Recovery Systems Administrator Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01 Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78 e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com<mailto:arnaud.br...@panalpina.com> This electronic message transmission contains information from Panalpina and is confidential or privileged. This information is intended only for the person (s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use or any other action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you receive this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender by e-mail, telephone or fax at the numbers listed above. Thank you. **
Re: Anyone using TSM Snapdiff support (linux and windows) to backup ONTAP CDOT 8.3
Hello Paul, I've done this setup for a customer last novembre (TSM 7.1.3) for both Windows and Linux shares. We had it working as expected, thanks to the skilled people of this shop. Indeed, the TSM B/A Client documentation is (was ?) not accurate for CDOT as it refers mainly to 7 Mode. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Paul Zarnowski" <p...@cornell.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 21:41:51 Objet: [ADSM-L] Anyone using TSM Snapdiff support (linux and windows) to backup ONTAP CDOT 8.3 Has anyone successfully used TSM on Windows (and Linux) to backup a NetApp filer running ONTAP CDOT 8.3? We're looking for confirmation that this works, as we've been having some problems getting it to run against a simulator running 8.3. Thanks! ..Paul -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 Assistant Director for Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 IT at Cornell / InfrastructureEm: p...@cornell.edu 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801
Re: TSM client support
Hello Chris, 5.3.6.7 is the lastest version that was supported on Windows 2000, it's available here : ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r3/Windows/Win2000/v536/ As usual, it should work with current version of servers, but i't still unsupported of course. I've heard that some people were unable to restore from tape data backed up by a 5.5 client after migrating the server to 7.1.4. If someone can say something on that particular problem. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Chris McKay" <chris.mc...@ycdsb.ca> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Mars 2016 19:54:18 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM client support Hi there, We are currently running TSM server version 6.3.4.200 and the majority of our Windows client nodes are running version 6.4. We do have a few old Windows 2000 server nodes running version 5.2.2.0 of the B\A client. I plan on upgrading the TSM server to version 7.1.4 in the near future, but expect to have issues with these particular nodes running the 5.2.2.0 client. Will a little newer client, such as 6.3 work on these Windows 2000 nodes? Does anyone else have other suggestions for these particular nodes? (other than upgrading the OS..) Kind regards, Chris -- IMPORTANT: This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this record is strictly prohibited. If you receive this record in error, please notify me immediately. In an effort to be environmentally friendly, please do not print unless required for hard copy record
Re: TSM Operation Center
Hello, See the SET NODEATRISKINTERVAL command in TSM 7.1 : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.srv.ref.doc/r_cmd_nodeatriskinterval_set.html?lang=en It should also be avaible with a right click in OC? depending on its version (maybe 7.1.1, or already in 7.1.0 ?). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "S Kumar" <our@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Dimanche 28 Février 2016 07:10:25 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM Operation Center Hi I have 10 node defined in TSM server. Namely Node1: File system backup Node1_SAP : SAP online/offline backup Node2: File system backup Node3: File system backup Node3_SAP : SAP Online backup Node4: File system backup Node4: File system backup Node4_ORA : Oracle DB online/offline backup Node5: File system backup Node6_DB2 : DB2 Online Backup I am taking daily online full backup of Node1_SAP, Node3_SAP, Node4_ORA and Node6_DB2. And in every fifteen days i am taking offline file system backup using node Node1, Node2, Node3, Node4, Node5 and Node6. In operation center, daily server protected percentage is 40%. Can we customize this output as per backup policy defined? Any idea.
Re: Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report
Hello Del, Thanks, the made some tests : the problem I reported are solved. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Del Hoobler" <hoob...@us.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 15 Février 2016 17:26:42 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report The Operations Center fix for the email reporting issue is now available: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/opcenter/7.1.4.200/ Thank you, Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 01/19/2016 01:26:26 PM: > From: Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 01/19/2016 01:27 PM > Subject: Re: Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hi Erwan, > > This is a known issue. IBM is working on a fix now. > > > Thank you, > > Del > > > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 01/19/2016 > 09:25:35 AM: > > > From: Erwann SIMON <erwann.si...@free.fr> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Date: 01/19/2016 09:26 AM > > Subject: Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm currently trying to use the new Operations Center Enhanced > > Reporting feature. > > > > TSM Server is 7.1.4.000, OC is 7.1.4.100. Similar tests have been > > made on AIX, Linux and Windows platforms. > > > > I've made the set up and I'm able to send default reports > > (DailyReportJob), but I'm unable to send custom reports. The is no > > specific message in OC or Actlog. > > > > But there's a clue in tsm_opscntr.log (/opt/tivoli/tsm/ui/Liberty/ > > usr/servers/guiServer/logs/tsm_opscntr.log) > > > > Failing Custom Report Job : > > 1/19/16 12:31:03.097 WET [tid=181513] [INFO] Custom Report Job running > > 1/19/16 12:31:03.206 WET [tid=181513] [ERROR] Problem running > CustomReportJob > > org.apache.velocity.exception.ResourceNotFoundException: Unable to > > find resource '../reports/template/CustomReport.vm' > > at > > org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.loadResource > > (ResourceManagerImpl.java:474) > > at > > org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.getResource > > (ResourceManagerImpl.java:352) > > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate > > (RuntimeInstance.java:1533) > > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate > > (RuntimeInstance.java:1514) > > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeSingleton.getTemplate > > (RuntimeSingleton.java:299) > > at > org.apache.velocity.app.Velocity.getTemplate(Velocity.java:358) > > at com.ibm.tsm.gui.reports.CustomReportJob.doRun > > (CustomReportJob.java:99) > > at > com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.jobs.ReportJob.execute(ReportJob.java:111) > > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.runJob > > (OCSchedulerJob.java:258) > > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.call > > (OCSchedulerJob.java:125) > > at > com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSJobThread.run(OCSJobThread.java:74) > > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call > > (Executors.java:522) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:277) > > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker > > (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1153) > > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run > > (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:785) > > > > Successful Default Report Job (Daily or License are OK) : > > 1/19/16 12:32:16.346 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Weekly Licensing Job > running > > 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Sent email with message > > ID: <-973800473.26.1453206736543.JavaMail.root@SRVTSM> > > 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] WeeklyLicenseJob: Email > > sent successful > > > > Have you successfully used those features ? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > > Erwann SIMON > > > >
Re: SQL statement
Hi Eric, You're absolutely right, the SQL resultas are just to be used for further analysis. Anyway, when deleting a filespace, we must now that type is ANY by default but we generally have to choose a specific type between backup and archive. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Vendredi 29 Janvier 2016 16:09:22 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL statement Hi Erwann! As a matter of fact this one requires a little more care. Null can be the result of a filespace backup which is interrupted and never restarted (i.e. because it has been excluded from the backup) but you will also see null when the filespace is only used for archiving. Creating an archive will not set the "Last Backup Completion Date/Time" field. In the first case you can delete the filespace, in the second case you most likely don't want to... Kind regards, Eric van Loon AF/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 16:46 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: SQL statement Hi Eric, You maybe should add a condition if backup_end is null -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Janvier 2016 16:20:57 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL statement Hi Skylar! This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your help!!! Kind regards, Eric van Loon AF/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar Thompson Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 15:59 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: SQL statement Hi EJ, I think this will do the trick: SELECT - f.node_name, - f.filespace_name, - f.backup_end, - CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM - filespaces f, - occupancy o - WHERE - o.node_name=f.node_name - AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name - AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY o.physical_mb DESC On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote: > Hi guys! > I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, > but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of > days... > I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, > filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, > along with the amount of data stored for them in GB > (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the > largest first. > Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance! > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > AF/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you > have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of > this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > -- -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu) -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354 -- University of Washington School of Medicine For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this messa
Re: SQL statement
Hi Eric, You maybe should add a condition if backup_end is null -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Janvier 2016 16:20:57 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL statement Hi Skylar! This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your help!!! Kind regards, Eric van Loon AF/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar Thompson Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 15:59 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: SQL statement Hi EJ, I think this will do the trick: SELECT - f.node_name, - f.filespace_name, - f.backup_end, - CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM - filespaces f, - occupancy o - WHERE - o.node_name=f.node_name - AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name - AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY o.physical_mb DESC On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote: > Hi guys! > I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, > but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of > days... > I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, > filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, > along with the amount of data stored for them in GB > (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the > largest first. > Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance! > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > AF/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you > have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of > this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > -- -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu) -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354 -- University of Washington School of Medicine For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1
Hi Zoltan, I don't think that restarting the server twice after having modified the activelogsize is still necessary as it was the case in early TSM v6 versions. You'll tell us. Be prepared to have a DB backup to automatically start (to the default DBRECOVERY device class). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Zoltan Forray" <zfor...@vcu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Janvier 2016 21:03:08 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 Great. So just reduce the actlogsize value and restart the server twice. I have a server whose DB backups constantly fail with the -2428 error since I set actlogsize to 120GB and the filesystem only has 126GB total space. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Reese, Michael A (Mike) CIV USARMY 93 SIG BDE (US) <michael.a.reese62@mail.mil> wrote: > When you reduce the size of the active log, you have to restart the TSM > server twice. The first restart just changes the DB2 parameters. The > second restart removes the log files that are no longer required. > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:45 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained > within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web > browser. > > > > > > > I don't think it does. I just checked and I have log files with > timestamps going back to January 12 (the day we restored the server) and I > do full DB backups daily. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Lee, Gary <g...@bsu.edu> wrote: > > > Shouldn't have to delete anything. Backing up the db should do it if > > memory serves. > > Been too long since I did it, and can't find my notes. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [Caution-mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > > Behalf Of Zoltan Forray > > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:52 AM > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 > > > > So, if I read correctly, to reduce my activelogsize, I > > > > 1. Backup the DB > > 2. Stop the TSM server > > 3. DELETE everything in the activelog directory/filesystem (in my > > case - > > /tsmlog) i.e. rm /tsmlog/* > > 4. Change ACTIVELOGSIZE to 65536 > > 5. Restart the TSM server > > > > Or is it simpler than that, i.e. just change ACTIVELOGSIZE and restart > > the server. Unless I missed it, the link/article posted by Erwann ( > > Caution-http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21677011) > > doesn't clarify. It just says "*Decrease the ACTIVELOGSIZE to allow > > the current filesystem to be 20% greater than the ACTIVELOGSIZE > > specified*" but no link says exactly how to do it. > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Nixon, Charles D. (David) < > > cdni...@carilionclinic.org> wrote: > > > > > This is what we had to do too (shrink logs to 50% before upgrade and > > > then grow after the procedure). It tried to double logs and then I > > > believe > > that > > > it forgot about the mirrored location because we were out of space. > > > > > > > > > --- > > > David Nixon > > > System Programmer II > > > Technology Services Group > > > Carilion Clinic > > > 451 Kimball Ave. > > > Roanoke, VA 24015 > > > Phone: 540-224-3903 > > > cdni...@carilionclinic.org > > > > > > Our mission: Improve the health of the communities we serve. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of > > > Lee, Gary [g...@bsu.edu] > > > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:50 PM > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 > > > > > > I never saw it in the docs. > > > > > > What I had to do was disable the server, do a full backup on the db, > > > then once I had verified the logs were empty, reduced log size to > > > less than > > half > > > file system space. > > > Then do the upgrade, and enlarge logs as necessary after upgrade is
Re: Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1
Hi all, You must have free space in file system where the active log is located. There wasn't such a need with TSM 6.3. See : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21677011 -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Gary Lee" <g...@bsu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Janvier 2016 15:06:45 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 If you are going to upgrade, yes. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 9:04 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 Hmmm - does that mean I need to reduce my log sizes? All of my systems have a 128GB filesystem just for active log. Most of them are ACTLOGSIZE 120GB On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Lee, Gary <g...@bsu.edu> wrote: > Yes. > > Make sure that you have at least double the size of your active and > archive logs as available free space in the respective log directories. > i.e. . if your active log size is 32 gB, insure that your log directory > has more than 64 gB free. Otherwise the database upgrade will fail on > install. > > Other than that, it went well, going from 6.3.4 to 7.1.3. > > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > molin gregory > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 10:30 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrade server from 6.3 to 7.1 > > Hello everyone > > I plan to upgrade my server from version 6.3 to version 7.1. > Have you had problems with this procedure? > > Thank you beforehand > Grégory > "ATTENTION. > > Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à > l'attention exclusive de leur destinataire (aux adresses spécifiques > auxquelles il a été adressé). Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce > message, vous devez immédiatement en avertir l'expéditeur et supprimer ce > message et les pièces jointes de votre système. > > This message and any attachments are confidential and intended to be > received only by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify immediately the sender by reply and delete the message and > any attachments from your system. " > -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding
Hi Robert, I thought that it's a new option in the 7.x branch, not already available in 6.x. Anyway, this absolute option does not appear in 6.4 client documentation. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Robert Ouzen" <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Dimanche 24 Janvier 2016 07:12:58 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hi Erwann IN client 6.x.x..x I have to the option of copy mode ABSOLUTE . so why I nned client vrsion 7+ ? It will not work ? Best Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 8:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hello Robert, If you only have client whose version is 7.1 or later, you can also use the absolute option : Use the absolute option with the incremental command to force a backup of all files and directories that match the file specification or domain, even if the objects were not changed since the last incremental backup. This option overrides the management class copy group mode parameter for backup copy groups; it does not affect the frequency parameter or any other backup copy group parameters. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Robert Ouzen" <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Samedi 23 Janvier 2016 16:12:07 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hi Keith I am curious of the result . I need too, to back up to a new storage pool of type directory container (new feature inV7.1.4). Cannot do a nextstg or move nodedata. So want to try your suggestion COPY MODE ABSOLUTE for now I did in another way. Rename the node to node_OLD (all FI are with extension _OLD after it) , recreate the node and change the destination to the new storage directory. After a wild delete the OLD FI and OLD node. My copypool looks like this: Policy Domain Policy Set Name Mgmt Class Name Versions Data Exists Versions Data Deleted Retain Extra Versions Retain Only VersionCopy Mode Copy Destination CC ACTIVE MGCC12 4 1 No Limit60 Modified NET_TSM So need to change to Policy Domain Policy Set Name Mgmt Class Name Versions Data Exists Versions Data Deleted Retain Extra Versions Retain Only VersionCopy Mode Copy Destination CC ACTIVE MGCC12 4 1 10 10 Absolute V7000_D1 So after 10-11 days all my 3 inactive versions will vanish from STG NET_TSM ... correct > Best Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Arbogast, Warren K Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hi Thomas, Thank you for your insight. RETONLY was 60 days during the absolute backups. We just reduced it to 30 days this morning when we saw unexpected files on the VTL. Perhaps tomorrow the VTL will look better. Best wishes, Keith Arbogast Indiana University On 1/22/16, 13:11, "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Thomas Denier" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU on behalf of thomas.den...@jefferson.edu> wrote: >Is RETONLY also set to 30 days? If RETONLY is longer than 30 days, backup >copies some files deleted before the absolute backups would be retained for >more than 30 days after the absolute backups. > >Thomas Denier >Thomas Jefferson University > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf >Of Arbogast, Warren K > >We have implemented directory container pools in TSM version 7.1.4 and are >happy with it. All new backups are written to the DEDUP pool, and old backups >are being migrated from the VTL to the DEDUP pool through a process of >replicating existing nodes' files to a DEDUP pool on a target server, then >replicating them back to the DEDUP pool on the source server. That process >works well. > >There is an urgency to empty the storage previously used on the VTL so it can >be re-purposed. To hurry the migration to the DEDUP pool along we devised a >strategy of running FULL backups (COPY MODE: ABSOLUTE) on certain small >servers in policy domains whos
Re: Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding
Hello Robert, If you only have client whose version is 7.1 or later, you can also use the absolute option : Use the absolute option with the incremental command to force a backup of all files and directories that match the file specification or domain, even if the objects were not changed since the last incremental backup. This option overrides the management class copy group mode parameter for backup copy groups; it does not affect the frequency parameter or any other backup copy group parameters. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Robert Ouzen" <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Samedi 23 Janvier 2016 16:12:07 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hi Keith I am curious of the result . I need too, to back up to a new storage pool of type directory container (new feature inV7.1.4). Cannot do a nextstg or move nodedata. So want to try your suggestion COPY MODE ABSOLUTE for now I did in another way. Rename the node to node_OLD (all FI are with extension _OLD after it) , recreate the node and change the destination to the new storage directory. After a wild delete the OLD FI and OLD node. My copypool looks like this: Policy Domain Policy Set Name Mgmt Class Name Versions Data Exists Versions Data Deleted Retain Extra Versions Retain Only VersionCopy Mode Copy Destination CC ACTIVE MGCC12 4 1 No Limit60 Modified NET_TSM So need to change to Policy Domain Policy Set Name Mgmt Class Name Versions Data Exists Versions Data Deleted Retain Extra Versions Retain Only VersionCopy Mode Copy Destination CC ACTIVE MGCC12 4 1 10 10 Absolute V7000_D1 So after 10-11 days all my 3 inactive versions will vanish from STG NET_TSM ... correct > Best Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Arbogast, Warren K Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Mode: Absolute misunderstanding Hi Thomas, Thank you for your insight. RETONLY was 60 days during the absolute backups. We just reduced it to 30 days this morning when we saw unexpected files on the VTL. Perhaps tomorrow the VTL will look better. Best wishes, Keith Arbogast Indiana University On 1/22/16, 13:11, "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Thomas Denier" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU on behalf of thomas.den...@jefferson.edu> wrote: >Is RETONLY also set to 30 days? If RETONLY is longer than 30 days, backup >copies some files deleted before the absolute backups would be retained for >more than 30 days after the absolute backups. > >Thomas Denier >Thomas Jefferson University > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of >Arbogast, Warren K > >We have implemented directory container pools in TSM version 7.1.4 and are >happy with it. All new backups are written to the DEDUP pool, and old backups >are being migrated from the VTL to the DEDUP pool through a process of >replicating existing nodes' files to a DEDUP pool on a target server, then >replicating them back to the DEDUP pool on the source server. That process >works well. > >There is an urgency to empty the storage previously used on the VTL so it can >be re-purposed. To hurry the migration to the DEDUP pool along we devised a >strategy of running FULL backups (COPY MODE: ABSOLUTE) on certain small >servers in policy domains whose destination was the DEDUP pool. That would >promote all of a node’s previous backups on the VTL to Inactive status. And, >since the pertinent RETAIN EXTRA VERSIONS setting was ’30’, we expected within >30 days all inactive versions would be expired and removed from the VTL. > >It’s 30 days later, and the strategy did not work perfectly. There are >thousands of files remaining on the VTL for nodes which had a COPY MODE: >ABSOLUTE backup. > >What am I misunderstanding about COPY MODE: ABSOLUTE? I had understood it >would force a 100% full backup, with no mitigation by include and exclude >statements. Apparently that’s not the case. Could someone clarify how it works? > >The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and >confidential information
Re: Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report
Thanks Del for your answer. It would be nice to be able to run regular query commands and not only select commands, like it was possible with the old Operational Reporting Tool. Also, it would be interesting to run a report from the Operations Center and beeing able to see it immediatly, without having to send it, or being able to send manually an inactive report, or... -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Del Hoobler" <hoob...@us.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 19 Janvier 2016 19:26:26 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report Hi Erwan, This is a known issue. IBM is working on a fix now. Thank you, Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 01/19/2016 09:25:35 AM: > From: Erwann SIMON <erwann.si...@free.fr> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 01/19/2016 09:26 AM > Subject: Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hi all, > > I'm currently trying to use the new Operations Center Enhanced > Reporting feature. > > TSM Server is 7.1.4.000, OC is 7.1.4.100. Similar tests have been > made on AIX, Linux and Windows platforms. > > I've made the set up and I'm able to send default reports > (DailyReportJob), but I'm unable to send custom reports. The is no > specific message in OC or Actlog. > > But there's a clue in tsm_opscntr.log (/opt/tivoli/tsm/ui/Liberty/ > usr/servers/guiServer/logs/tsm_opscntr.log) > > Failing Custom Report Job : > 1/19/16 12:31:03.097 WET [tid=181513] [INFO] Custom Report Job running > 1/19/16 12:31:03.206 WET [tid=181513] [ERROR] Problem running CustomReportJob > org.apache.velocity.exception.ResourceNotFoundException: Unable to > find resource '../reports/template/CustomReport.vm' > at > org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.loadResource > (ResourceManagerImpl.java:474) > at > org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.getResource > (ResourceManagerImpl.java:352) > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate > (RuntimeInstance.java:1533) > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate > (RuntimeInstance.java:1514) > at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeSingleton.getTemplate > (RuntimeSingleton.java:299) > at org.apache.velocity.app.Velocity.getTemplate(Velocity.java:358) > at com.ibm.tsm.gui.reports.CustomReportJob.doRun > (CustomReportJob.java:99) > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.jobs.ReportJob.execute(ReportJob.java:111) > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.runJob > (OCSchedulerJob.java:258) > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.call > (OCSchedulerJob.java:125) > at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSJobThread.run(OCSJobThread.java:74) > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call > (Executors.java:522) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:277) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker > (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1153) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run > (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:785) > > Successful Default Report Job (Daily or License are OK) : > 1/19/16 12:32:16.346 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Weekly Licensing Job running > 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Sent email with message > ID: <-973800473.26.1453206736543.JavaMail.root@SRVTSM> > 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] WeeklyLicenseJob: Email > sent successful > > Have you successfully used those features ? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي > Erwann SIMON >
Operations Center 7.1.4 : Unable to send custom report
Hi all, I'm currently trying to use the new Operations Center Enhanced Reporting feature. TSM Server is 7.1.4.000, OC is 7.1.4.100. Similar tests have been made on AIX, Linux and Windows platforms. I've made the set up and I'm able to send default reports (DailyReportJob), but I'm unable to send custom reports. The is no specific message in OC or Actlog. But there's a clue in tsm_opscntr.log (/opt/tivoli/tsm/ui/Liberty/usr/servers/guiServer/logs/tsm_opscntr.log) Failing Custom Report Job : 1/19/16 12:31:03.097 WET [tid=181513] [INFO] Custom Report Job running 1/19/16 12:31:03.206 WET [tid=181513] [ERROR] Problem running CustomReportJob org.apache.velocity.exception.ResourceNotFoundException: Unable to find resource '../reports/template/CustomReport.vm' at org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.loadResource(ResourceManagerImpl.java:474) at org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.getResource(ResourceManagerImpl.java:352) at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate(RuntimeInstance.java:1533) at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeInstance.getTemplate(RuntimeInstance.java:1514) at org.apache.velocity.runtime.RuntimeSingleton.getTemplate(RuntimeSingleton.java:299) at org.apache.velocity.app.Velocity.getTemplate(Velocity.java:358) at com.ibm.tsm.gui.reports.CustomReportJob.doRun(CustomReportJob.java:99) at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.jobs.ReportJob.execute(ReportJob.java:111) at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.runJob(OCSchedulerJob.java:258) at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSchedulerJob.call(OCSchedulerJob.java:125) at com.ibm.tsm.scheduler.cntl.OCSJobThread.run(OCSJobThread.java:74) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:522) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:277) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1153) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:785) Successful Default Report Job (Daily or License are OK) : 1/19/16 12:32:16.346 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Weekly Licensing Job running 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] Sent email with message ID: <-973800473.26.1453206736543.JavaMail.root@SRVTSM> 1/19/16 12:32:16.771 WET [tid=181527] [INFO] WeeklyLicenseJob: Email sent successful Have you successfully used those features ? Thanks in advance. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide
Hi Stephan, Our concern is about Administrator's Guide, not Administrator's Reference wich is hopefully still available. Last available version for this Guide is 7.1.1. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Stefan Bender" <stefan.ben...@de.ibm.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 14 Décembre 2015 15:25:36 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide Hi all, the Admin Guides are still there. May be a little complicate to identify. If you look in this page "Server documentation in PDF files": http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.4/srv.common/r_pdf_srv.html?lang=en , you can find a row for "Using commands and options " for example. These point to the admin guides, like http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/api/content/nl/en-us/SSGSG7_7.1.4/srv.reference/b_srv_admin_ref_linux.pdf for Linux. I hope that helps. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Stefan Bender Hechtsheimer Strasse 2 / 55131 Mainz / Germany IBM Software Development "IBM Spectrum Protect" Tel. ++49-6131-846989 or ++49-7034-643-2773 / Fax. ++49-06131 -84-2520 / email: stefan.ben...@de.ibm.com -- IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 From: Rick Adamson <rickadam...@segrocers.com> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 14.12.2015 15:18 Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> I agree many times I have had to refer to one of the PDF's after IBM has made the decision to remove it from availability. They are a priceless resource when dealing with an issue on a version that is no longer supported and hence online doco has been removed. -Rick Adamson 904.783.5264 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger Deschner Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:39 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide A great book is gone. The TSM Administrator's Guide has been obsoleted as of v7.1.3. Its priceless collection of how-to information has been scattered to the winds, which basically means it is lost. A pity, because this book had been a model of complete, well-organized, documentation. The "Solution Guides" are suitable only for planning a new TSM installation, and do not address existing TSM sites. Furthermore, they are much too narrow, and do not cover real-world existing TSM customers. For instance, we use a blended disk and tape solution (D2D2D2T) to create a good working compromise between faster restore and storage cost. Following links to topics in the online Information Center is a haphazard process at best, which is never repeatable. There is no Index or Table of Contents for the online doc - so you cannot even see what information is there. Unless you actually log in, there is no way to even leave a "trail of breadcrumbs". Browser bookmarks are useless here, due to IBM's habit of changing URLs frequently. This is an extremely inefficient use of my time in finding out how to do something in TSM. Search is not an acceptable replacement for good organization. Search is necessary, but it cannot stand alone. Building a "collection" is not an answer to this requirement. It still lacks a coherent Index or Table of Contents, so once my collection gets sizeable, it is also unuseable. And with each successive version, I will be required to rebuild my collection from scratch all over again. Despite the fact that it had become fairly large, I humbly ask that the Administrator's Guide be published again, as a single PDF, in v7.1.4. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu ==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
Re: extending tsm active logs for tsm 6.3.4
Hi Gary, See Administrator's Guide (b_srv_admin_guide_linux.pdf), Chapter 21. Managing the database and recovery log, Increasing the size of the active log : If the log is running out of space, the current transaction is rolled back, and the server issues an error message and halts. You cannot restart the server until the active log size is increased. To increase the size of the active log while the server is halted, complete the following steps: 1. Issue the DSMSERV DISPLAY LOG offline utility to display the size of the active log. 2. Ensure that the location for the active log has enough space for the increased log size. If a log mirror exists, its location must also have enough space for the increased log size. 3. Halt the server. 4. In the dsmserv.opt file, update the ACTIVELOGSIZE option to the new maximum size of the active log, in megabytes. For example, to change the active log to its maximum size of 128 GB, enter the following server option: activelogsize 131072 5. If you plan to use a new active log directory, update the directory name specified in the ACTIVELOGDIRECTORY server option. The new directory must be empty and must be accessible to the user ID of the database manager. 6. Restart the server. Log files of 512 MB are automatically defined until the size specified in the ACTIVELOGSIZE option is reached. If a log mirror exists, log files are also defined automatically. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Gary Lee" <g...@bsu.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 14 Décembre 2015 21:25:47 Objet: [ADSM-L] extending tsm active logs for tsm 6.3.4 Tsm server 6.3.4 under redhat 6.7. If I want to increase the size of the tsm active log, must I backup, reformat and restore the database? So far that's all I have found. If not, where is the procedure for extending the log? Thanks for the help.
Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide
I remember the time when Andy Raibeck was advising to read it cover to cover... Yes, please, bring the Admin Guide back. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Roger Deschner" <rog...@uic.edu> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Samedi 12 Décembre 2015 02:39:28 Objet: [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide A great book is gone. The TSM Administrator's Guide has been obsoleted as of v7.1.3. Its priceless collection of how-to information has been scattered to the winds, which basically means it is lost. A pity, because this book had been a model of complete, well-organized, documentation. The "Solution Guides" are suitable only for planning a new TSM installation, and do not address existing TSM sites. Furthermore, they are much too narrow, and do not cover real-world existing TSM customers. For instance, we use a blended disk and tape solution (D2D2D2T) to create a good working compromise between faster restore and storage cost. Following links to topics in the online Information Center is a haphazard process at best, which is never repeatable. There is no Index or Table of Contents for the online doc - so you cannot even see what information is there. Unless you actually log in, there is no way to even leave a "trail of breadcrumbs". Browser bookmarks are useless here, due to IBM's habit of changing URLs frequently. This is an extremely inefficient use of my time in finding out how to do something in TSM. Search is not an acceptable replacement for good organization. Search is necessary, but it cannot stand alone. Building a "collection" is not an answer to this requirement. It still lacks a coherent Index or Table of Contents, so once my collection gets sizeable, it is also unuseable. And with each successive version, I will be required to rebuild my collection from scratch all over again. Despite the fact that it had become fairly large, I humbly ask that the Administrator's Guide be published again, as a single PDF, in v7.1.4. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu ==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
Re: Question about O.C V7.1.3
leW 1.1 M 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,266 Tcp/Ip IdleW 1.1 M 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,273 Tcp/Ip IdleW 58 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,281 Tcp/Ip IdleW 53 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,293 Tcp/Ip IdleW 43 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,303 Tcp/Ip IdleW 33 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,309 Tcp/Ip IdleW 28 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,319 Tcp/Ip IdleW 17 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,324 Tcp/Ip IdleW 12 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,330 Tcp/Ip IdleW7 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >28,335 Tcp/Ip IdleW2 S 170 198 >Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK > >How come ? In the previous version I had only a few > >Any tips how to resolve it ? > >T.I.A Regards > >Rbert -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: Question about O.C V7.1.3
Ok ! I'll check if I get the same behaviour and will inform you. Le 26 octobre 2015 07:42:05 CET, Robert Ouzen <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> a écrit : >Hi Erwann > >My previous version of server and O.C was V7.1.1.200 > >I have to server one HUB ( Postback) and one spoke (Adsm2) , both are >now at version V7.1.3.100 > >O.C works fine (I think) no problem , but as I said in my previous >message a lot of entries in Q SE > >Bet Regards, > >Robert > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf >Of Erwann Simon >Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:28 AM >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about O.C V7.1.3 > >Hello Robert, > >Which were your previous versions of server and oc ? > >Do you have a single server, or do you have spoke servers also ? If so, >what are their respective versions ? > >Is OC responsive or is it slow ? > >No idea or supposed known defect, just to be curious. I'll work on a >similar environnement this week : one hub server (with no clients) just >upgraded to 7.1.3, and 3 spoke servers (one 7.1.1.300 and two 6.3.5.100 >to be upgraded to 7.1.1.300). > >Regards, >Erwann > >Le 26 octobre 2015 06:57:37 CET, Robert Ouzen <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> >a écrit : >>Hi to all >> >>After upgrading my TSM server to version V7.1.3.0 + V7.1.3.100 and my >>Operations center to V7.1.3.0. >> >>I notice that I have in Q SE a lot of: IBM-OC-POSTBACK client name >>which is the client name for O.C in the Hub server >> >>Sess Comm. SessWait Bytes Bytes >Sess >> Platform Client Name >>Number Method StateTimeSent Recvd >>Type >>-- -- -- -- --- --- >>--- -- >>20 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S8.7 M 145 Admin > >>WinNTROBERT >>31 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 23.2 M 262.2 K Admin > >>DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>13,742 Tcp/Ip IdleW3 S 62.2 K 40.2 M >>Admin Windows ADSM2 >>26,735 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 351.0 K 163 >>Admin WinNTROBERT >>27,126 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 40.5 K 715 >>Admin WinNTROBERT >>27,847 Tcp/Ip IdleW2 S 269.3 K 117.3 K >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,068 Tcp/Ip IdleW 3.4 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,078 Tcp/Ip IdleW 3.3 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,086 Tcp/Ip IdleW 3.2 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,094 Tcp/Ip IdleW 3.1 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,101 Tcp/Ip IdleW 3.1 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,116 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.9 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,122 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.8 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,127 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.7 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,133 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.6 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,138 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.6 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,144 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.5 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,150 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.4 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,155 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.3 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,158 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.3 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,163 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.2 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,168 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.1 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,174 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.1 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-POSTBACK >>28,179 Tcp/Ip IdleW 2.0 M 170 198 >>Admin DSMAPI IBM-OC-P
Re: NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate
Hello, Anyway, the last access timestamp is generally mandatory if you're using HSM. Le 8 octobre 2015 13:55:36 CEST, Bent Christensen <b...@cowi.dk> a écrit : >Your offhand thought is correct. > >NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate goes all the way back to Windows 2000 where >the time stamp of a directory would change if you did something with >the files in it. > >I find it hard to imagine that anyone backs up based on the last-access >time stamp and not the last-written time stamp? > > - Bent > > >-Original Message- > >All, > >TSM 7.1.1 environment. >My Windows fileserver colleague is asking me about any potential backup >ramifications from disabling the LastAccessUpdate on our new Windows >2012R2 fileservers. >I didn't find any definitive answers via Mr. Google so I thought I'd >reach out and see if anyone in the group had some knowledge. >My offhand thought is that since we don't do any HSM, we don't really >use this particular bit, but... > >Here is what he asked: > >By default Windows Server 2012 R2 disabled Last Access Update on files >and folders. >This is the registry location where this is stored: >HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem\NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate >This KB articles discusses this and it says this: >https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc785435.aspx >The disablelastaccess parameter can affect programs such as Backup and >Remote Storage that rely on this feature. >Does the TSM Baclient rely on this value? With it disabled do we lose >anything with TSM? > >Thanks, >Steve Schaub >Systems Engineer II, Backup/Recovery >Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee > > >-- >Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee >E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: Reg: can we diable events for ANR0422W
Hello, No, you can't disable server events (ANR) from actlog. Le 7 octobre 2015 17:42:44 CEST, Srikanth Kola23 <srkol...@in.ibm.com> a écrit : >Hi Team, > >recently we have moved servers to tsm/ve backups , but most of the >clients >we do not alter sys/opt files & do not kill scheduler service hence we >are >getting below alerts as a bunch ( we do not have client access) > >can we disable events for the particular msg number (ANR0422W) for act >log >tracking for some nodes ( more than 1000) > >Oct 7, 2015, 12:08:40 AM ANR0422W Session 15971 for node POKCPSAPAP12 >(Linux x86-64) refused - node name not registered. (SESSION: 15971) > >Thanks & Regards, > >Srikanth kola >Backup & Recovery >IBM India Pvt Ltd, Chennai >Mobile: +91 9885473450 -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: Reg: can we diable events for ANR0422W
Hi Rick, Sorry, but this won't work for actlog. The help for disable events command considering actlog receiver says : You can disable only client events, not server events for the activity log. Le 7 octobre 2015 19:33:12 CEST, Rick Adamson <rickadam...@segrocers.com> a écrit : >Try using "disable events". for example: "disable events actlog >abcd,abcd,abcd" >Where "abcd" is replaced with the 4-digit number preceeded by ANR. > >See help section 3.15.1 > >-Rick Adamson > > >On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Srikanth Kola23 <srkol...@in.ibm.com> >wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> recently we have moved servers to tsm/ve backups , but most of the >> clients we do not alter sys/opt files & do not kill scheduler service > >> hence we are getting below alerts as a bunch ( we do not have client >> access) >> >> can we disable events for the particular msg number (ANR0422W) for >act >> log tracking for some nodes ( more than 1000) >> >> Oct 7, 2015, 12:08:40 AM ANR0422W Session 15971 for node POKCPSAPAP12 > >> (Linux x86-64) refused - node name not registered. (SESSION: 15971) >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> Srikanth kola >> Backup & Recovery >> IBM India Pvt Ltd, Chennai >> Mobile: +91 9885473450 >> -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: Backup VM without quiescing
Hi, Maybe INCLUDE.VMSNAPSHOTATTEMPTS ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Hans Christian Riksheim" <bull...@gmail.com> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 6 Octobre 2015 11:30:05 Objet: [ADSM-L] Backup VM without quiescing I think I heard somewhere(TSM Symposium maybe) that it should be possible to backup a VM without quiesceing if quiesced snapshot fails. I have looked through the 7.1.3 infocenter without finding anything yet. Anyone know? Best regards, Hans Chr.
Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools
Hi, As previously said by Deirdre, see the FAQ : https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/Directory-container%20storage%20pools%20FAQs -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Robert Ouzen" <rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 6 Octobre 2015 11:47:12 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools Hi to all Today in my V7.1.3 test environment , tried to move data from old stg fashion (file) to directory container storage without any success Tried with commands: move nodedata and move data Here output tsm: TSMTEST>move nodedata test from=tsmstg1 to=stg_dir ANR3385E MOVE NODEDATA: The operation is not allowed for container storage pools. tsm: TSMTEST>move data C:\MOUNTPOINTS\STORAGE_1\STG1\0267.BFS stg=stg_dir ANR3385E MOVE DATA: The operation is not allowed for container storage pools. I tried too , to do a nextstg TSMTEST>upd stg tsmstg1 nextstg=stg_dir ANR2399E UPDATE STGPOOL: Storage pool STG_DIR is not a sequential pool. I of course define stg with stgtype=directory (stg_dir) and after it define stgpooldirectory Anybody know a way to move old stg to new stg with stgtype=directory Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan Folkerts Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools I believe you can "move data" data into the container pools, you just can't get the data out with traditional methods at the moment but only via TSM node replication. I like the new pool type but they are only suitable to a specific type of setup, the good news is that this setup covers a lot of the new type of TSM deployments we are doing! On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Sergio O. Fuentes <sfuen...@umd.edu> wrote: > This question is relevant. How do I move from a file devclass stgpool > to a directory-container pool. And what's the impact on the DB if I do this? > I already had multi-site configured for our environment with the > tools that exist in versions <7.1.3. I'm not getting another 200TB > array to move data to new directory-container pools. > > Thanks! > > SF > > On 9/16/15, 10:49 AM, "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Ryder, > Michael S" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU on behalf of michael_s.ry...@roche.com> > wrote: > > >I am very interested in directory-container storage pools. > > > >But... > > > >If Migration or Move Data are not options, then how does one > >transition data from existing primary storage pools to a > >directory-container storage pool? > > > >Mike > > > >Best regards, > > > >Mike <http://rbbuswiki.bbg.roche.com/wiki/ryderm_page:start>, x7942 > >RMD IT Client Services > ><http://rmsit.dia.roche.com/Pages/default.aspx> > > > >On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Rick Adamson > ><rickadam...@segrocers.com> > >wrote: > > > >> I may be wrong but from reading the 7.1.3 doco new container > >> approach combined with the inline dedup eliminate the need for some > >> of these processes. Also, where traditionally a "copy" storage pool > >> was used they now refer to it as a "protect" storage pool which has > >> the ability to be replicated to another "onsite" or "offsite" container > >> storage pool. > >> > >> Remember that with deduplicated data many of the processes you > >>mentioned required that the data be rehydrated to be performed. An > >>added benefit is if in fact these processes are no longer required > >>it will free up system resources and as a result lower storage > >>costs and increase scalability. > >> > >> Fortunately, there are some good resources for additional information: > >> IBM you tube channel: > >> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGkjRNkO0AQNyQbWhS1tTzw > >> IBM knowledge center for 7.1.3: > >> > >> > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.3/tsm/welcome > .ht > >>ml > >> > >> I will be installing it on two systems today to begin testing, > >> hopefully I'll be able to comment more soon.. > >> > >> > >> -Rick Adamson > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > >> Behalf > Of > >> James Thorne > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 201
Re: Backing up large folder
Hello Michael, Considering the number of objects backed up compared to the number of objects inspected, setting the resource utilization to 10 should not be helpfull. Becasue the comparison is always done by a single producer thread for a single filespace. You'd better try Journal Based Backup wich is helpfull in determining backup candidates. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Michael Devenney" <mdeven...@retsd.mb.ca> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Octobre 2015 14:43:42 Objet: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder I am running TSM 6.3.5.0 on Windows 2008 R2. I have a Windows 2008 R2 file server that has a 4.3 TB user homedir folder. It is currently taking 22 hours to back it up. There are several folders located on this Drive. I have one schedule to backup most of the drive and I have created a separate schedule for the homedir backup and I back up using the share name. I set the resource utilization to 10 and I updated the TSM client to 7.1.3.0. This folder is on a Drive that is located on our SAN. Any suggestions on how to speed up the backup? 09/27/2015 16:07:20 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects inspected: 10,698,367 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects backed up: 216,428 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects updated: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects rebound: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects deleted: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects expired: 12,793 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects failed: 19 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects encrypted:0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of subfile objects: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects grew: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of retries: 28 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes inspected: 2.31 TB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes transferred:84.47 MB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Data transfer time:1.32 sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Network data transfer rate: 65,234.56 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Aggregate data transfer rate: 1.07 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Objects compressed by:0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total data reduction ratio: 100.00% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Subfile objects reduced by: 0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Elapsed processing time: 22:15:38 Thanks for your help. Michael Devenney CNE, MCTS, A+, Server+ Service Administrator River East Transcona School Division 589 Roch Street Winnipeg, Mb. R2K 2P7 Canada CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Backing up large folder
Hello Charles, Virtualmountpoint can't be used on Windows, it's an option that's only available Unix (and Linux). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Charles D. Nixon (David)" <cdni...@carilionclinic.org> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Octobre 2015 15:01:21 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder Is it possible to organize the home directories into something like A-F, G-L,... Then use virtual mount points so that the TSM client views each of these groupings as a separate volume and thus the worker threads will kick in as expected? --- David Nixon System Programmer II, Enterprise Storage Team Carilion Clinic | 451 Kimball Avenue | Roanoke, VA 24016 540.224.3903 (Work) 540.525.8000 (Mobile) From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Michael Devenney [mdeven...@retsd.mb.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 8:43 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder I am running TSM 6.3.5.0 on Windows 2008 R2. I have a Windows 2008 R2 file server that has a 4.3 TB user homedir folder. It is currently taking 22 hours to back it up. There are several folders located on this Drive. I have one schedule to backup most of the drive and I have created a separate schedule for the homedir backup and I back up using the share name. I set the resource utilization to 10 and I updated the TSM client to 7.1.3.0. This folder is on a Drive that is located on our SAN. Any suggestions on how to speed up the backup? 09/27/2015 16:07:20 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects inspected: 10,698,367 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects backed up: 216,428 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects updated: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects rebound: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects deleted: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects expired: 12,793 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects failed: 19 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects encrypted:0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of subfile objects: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects grew: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of retries: 28 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes inspected: 2.31 TB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes transferred:84.47 MB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Data transfer time:1.32 sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Network data transfer rate: 65,234.56 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Aggregate data transfer rate: 1.07 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Objects compressed by:0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total data reduction ratio: 100.00% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Subfile objects reduced by: 0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Elapsed processing time: 22:15:38 Thanks for your help. Michael Devenney CNE, MCTS, A+, Server+ Service Administrator River East Transcona School Division 589 Roch Street Winnipeg, Mb. R2K 2P7 Canada CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Notice: The information and attachment(s) contained in this communication are intended for the addressee only, and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately, and delete this communication from any computer or network system. Any interception, review, printing, copying, re-transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. Carilion Clinic shall not be liable for the improper and/or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt.
Re: Backing up large folder
Aou can follow this Andy Raibeck's tip : http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/ibm-tsm-13/virtual-mount-points-for-windows-clients-101311/ For non-Unix/Linux operating systems, there is no virtualmountpoint feature in TSM. However, one way to accomplish what you want is to define shares for the directories you want to back up, then add the share names to your domain. For example: On Windows machine "araibeck", create a share for the "andyr" and "storman" user directories: net share andyr=c:\users\andyr net share storman=c:\users\storman In dsm.opt specify: domain \\araibeck\andyr \\araibeck\storman If you also want to back up C:, but skip the andyr and storman directories when processing C:, then in dsm.opt specify: domain c: \\araibeck\andyr \\araibeck\storman exclude c:\users\andyr exclude c:\users\storman -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Erwann SIMON" <erwann.si...@free.fr> À: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Octobre 2015 15:23:16 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder Hello Charles, Virtualmountpoint can't be used on Windows, it's an option that's only available Unix (and Linux). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: "Charles D. Nixon (David)" <cdni...@carilionclinic.org> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Octobre 2015 15:01:21 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder Is it possible to organize the home directories into something like A-F, G-L,... Then use virtual mount points so that the TSM client views each of these groupings as a separate volume and thus the worker threads will kick in as expected? --- David Nixon System Programmer II, Enterprise Storage Team Carilion Clinic | 451 Kimball Avenue | Roanoke, VA 24016 540.224.3903 (Work) 540.525.8000 (Mobile) From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Michael Devenney [mdeven...@retsd.mb.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 8:43 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Backing up large folder I am running TSM 6.3.5.0 on Windows 2008 R2. I have a Windows 2008 R2 file server that has a 4.3 TB user homedir folder. It is currently taking 22 hours to back it up. There are several folders located on this Drive. I have one schedule to backup most of the drive and I have created a separate schedule for the homedir backup and I back up using the share name. I set the resource utilization to 10 and I updated the TSM client to 7.1.3.0. This folder is on a Drive that is located on our SAN. Any suggestions on how to speed up the backup? 09/27/2015 16:07:20 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects inspected: 10,698,367 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects backed up: 216,428 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects updated: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects rebound: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects deleted: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects expired: 12,793 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects failed: 19 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects encrypted:0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of subfile objects: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of objects grew: 0 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of retries: 28 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes inspected: 2.31 TB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total number of bytes transferred:84.47 MB 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Data transfer time:1.32 sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Network data transfer rate: 65,234.56 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Aggregate data transfer rate: 1.07 KB/sec 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Objects compressed by:0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Total data reduction ratio: 100.00% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Subfile objects reduced by: 0% 09/27/2015 16:07:20 Elapsed processing time: 22:15:38 Thanks for your help. Michael Devenney CNE, MCTS, A+, Server+ Service Administrator River East Transcona School Division 589 Roch Street Winnipeg, Mb. R2K 2P7 Canada CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Notice: The information and attachment(s) contained in this communication are intended for the addressee only, and may be co
Re: mismatch capacity
Hello Robert, As your storage pools are configured for deduplication, you have to choose the reporting_mb column (and not logical_mb) in order to have the same statistics with Q OCC ans SELECT FROM OCCUPANCY. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Août 2015 11:19:19 Objet: [ADSM-L] mismatch capacity H I to all I wanted to know for a specific nodename the amount of data backup on a specific stgpool Here the script: tsm: ADSM2select sum(logical_mb) / 1024 as Capacity of Data from occupancy where node_name='MNHL2_CLUSTER' and stgpool_name='V7000_2' Capacity of Data -- 745.50 But when done the query: q occ mnhl2_clusterI got a different summary ! As you see much more data on storage V7000_2 ? I run too before a audit license tsm: ADSM2q occ mnhl2_cluster Node Name Type Filespace FSID Storage Number of Physical Logical NamePool NameFiles Space Space OccupiedOccupied (MB)(MB) -- -- -- --- --- --- MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-1 DEDUPTSM49 -2.04 STERs/APPS MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-3 DEDUPTSM 367,258 - 540,014.69 STERs/CSMS1 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-3 V7000_2 44 - 74,920.13 STERs/CSMS1 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-4 DEDUPTSM 221,781 - 1,224,645.8 STERs/CSMS2 8 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-5 DEDUPTSM 135,968 - 1,324,964.7 STERs/CSMS3 5 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-5 V7000_2 10 -3,060.52 STERs/CSMS3 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-2 DEDUPTSM19,294 - 471,033.91 STERs/CSMS4 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-2 V7000_2 1 - 137.14 STERs/CSMS4 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-6 DEDUPTSM 1,758,166 - 799,055.63 STERs/DATA MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-6 V7000_2176 - 441,244.84 STERs/DATA MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-7 DEDUPTSM 366,650 - 901,211.44 STERs/DATA2 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-7 V7000_2332 - 733,649.63 STERs/DATA2 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-9 DEDUPTSM 1,286,727 - 2,253,114.2 STERs/NSCI 5 MNHL2_CLU- Bkup /media/ns-9 V7000_2 46 - 14,892.99 STERs/NSCI Best Regrards Robert
Re: any help file for dsmc options
Hello, Have a look to TSM Client installation and user's guide and dsmc help command. There's no CHM file for general TSM Client help. Le 11 août 2015 16:33:54 WEST, Srikanth Kola23 srkol...@in.ibm.com a écrit : Hi Team, do we have any file that can be downloaded to see help or commands of all commands in dsmc like dsmcutil html file in windows under default installation folder Thanks Regards, Srikanth kola Backup Recovery IBM India Pvt Ltd, Chennai Mobile: +91 9885473450 -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: Reg: script to get library drive Serial Nos from OS level
Hello,
On Linux, there is more than a way get it, here's two (for IBM devices managed
by lin_tape driver), using udevadm (RHEL6) :
for IBMTAPE in /dev/IBM*[0-9]; do echo $(basename ${IBMTAPE}) $( /sys$(udevadm
info --query=path --name=${IBMTAPE})/serial_num); done
for IBMTAPE in /dev/IBM*[0-9]; do echo $(basename ${IBMTAPE}) $(udevadm info
--attribute-walk --name=${IBMTAPE} | grep serial_num); done
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: Srikanth Kola23 srkol...@in.ibm.com
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Août 2015 21:51:14
Objet: [ADSM-L] Reg: script to get library drive Serial Nos from OS level
Hi Team,
I am in the need of collecting drive library serial numbers for 50
servers from os level for lanfree setup
any scripts for me to fetch data
I have AIX , Linux boxes
library 3573 scsi ( linux AIX )
Emc data domain(VTL) (linux)
Thanks Regards,
Srikanth kola
Backup Recovery
IBM India Pvt Ltd, Chennai
Mobile: +91 9885473450
Re: Reg: script to get library drive Serial Nos from OS level
Hi, In addition to OS scripts, you can also take your chance with sandicovery, query san and perform libaction... -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Srikanth Kola23 srkol...@in.ibm.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Août 2015 21:51:14 Objet: [ADSM-L] Reg: script to get library drive Serial Nos from OS level Hi Team, I am in the need of collecting drive library serial numbers for 50 servers from os level for lanfree setup any scripts for me to fetch data I have AIX , Linux boxes library 3573 scsi ( linux AIX ) Emc data domain(VTL) (linux) Thanks Regards, Srikanth kola Backup Recovery IBM India Pvt Ltd, Chennai Mobile: +91 9885473450
Re: Query Activedata
Hello David, The simplest way is to do an export node with preview option for the node you want to know the size of activedata. Know it's time and resource consuming. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: David Ehresman david.ehres...@louisville.edu À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 3 Août 2015 18:10:48 Objet: [ADSM-L] Query Activedata Is there a way to query the size of the activedata per node/per storagegroup/per tsm server? I'm not asking the size of an activedata storagepool, there is none, but the size of the currently active, as opposed to inactive, data TSM is storing. David
Re: What are these activity types in the ACTIVITY_SUMMARY table
Brian, My guess is that these entries are used for capacity trend graphs in Operations Center. Le 10 juillet 2015 00:42:05 GMT+07:00, Brian G. Kunst bku...@uw.edu a écrit : In the ACTIVITY_SUMMARY table, there are two activity types that I do not understand: POOLCOPYUTILGB POOLPRIMUTILGB I can see these activities are running frequently, but I can't figure out what they are. I haven't been able to find any documentation on the activity types in the ACTIVITY_SUMMARY, and googling hasn't turned up anything either. Can anyone clue me into what they are? Thanks, -- Brian Kunst Storage Administrator Large Scale Storage Systems UW Information Technology -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Re: TSM, Linux and VMs
Hello Mike, I guess you're using the old VCB backup modes (with filelevel option). VCB allows image level (fullvm) for any guest operating system, but file-level is limited to Windows guest operating system. See this datasheet from VMware : http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/consolidated_backup_datasheet.pdf So, you won't be able to perform off-host file-level backup of your Linux guests. The only available solutions are : - installing a Linux B/A client, but i'ts an in guest istallation. - installing TSM for VE that allows file-level recovery from an forever incremental block-level image backup. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Michael S Ryder michael_s.ry...@roche.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Juillet 2015 05:13:03 Objet: [ADSM-L] TSM, Linux and VMs Folks: Is it possible to perform off-host, file-level incremental backups of Linux VMs from a Linux proxy or data mover? I am using TSM 7.1.1 Server, and have a mix of Windows and Linux VMs (VMware, vSphere 5.5 environment). I have no trouble using my Windows data mover with the BA client to perform file-level backups of Windows VMs, but I am thus far unable to use my Linux data mover host with BA client to perform file-level backups of Linux VMs. Is this not supported? If not... what is the best way to perform off-host, file level incremental backups of Linux VMs? Best regards, Mike, x7942 RMD IT Client Services
Re: Backup and restore question
Hi Robert, I think that -incremental and –deletefiles are not available (or ignored) with -imagetofile. It makes sense since -incremental would lead to a file restore whereas -imagetofile leads to a bloc restore. You should note that –deletefiles is not availbale (or ignored) if your backup has been done like you do : backup image F: -mode=incremental -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Juin 2015 11:57:18 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Hello Ronald Make sense …. But still I made today a little test 1.Run a backup image F: (Full) (On it I have there a file test.txt with content: “First full backup Image”) 2. Edit this file test.txt and overwrite with “Incremental backup image” 3.: run a backup image F: -mode=incremental See below the output (seems good) tsm backup image f: -mode=incremental Total number of objects inspected: 16 Total number of objects backed up:1 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of objects encrypted:0 Total number of objects grew: 0 Total number of retries: 0 Total number of bytes inspected: 41.51 KB Total number of bytes transferred: 240 B Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:0.00 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 0.03 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Total data reduction ratio: 99.44% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:07 4. did an: restore image F: E:\DiskF.iso –imagetofile -incremental –deletefiles 5.But on the file DiskF.iso I see on the test.txt file the content of: “First full backup Image” and not “Incremental backup image” I know I missed something but I can’t figure WHAT ??? Best Regards Robert From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron Delaware Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 9:34 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Robert, You cannot perform a normal incremental once you have performed a full image, unless you have two separate nodes, one doing image backups and one doing file by file backups. You can do incremental image backups but not an file by file incremental. Best Regards,
Re: Backup and restore question
Hello Robert, The –deletefiles flag won't be an option if you don't run regular incremental backup which is able to mark deleted files as inactive. The -mode=incremental flag uses incremental by date method that does not, so TSM DB is not aware of file deletion. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 15 Juin 2015 14:50:58 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Hello Erwann I need a little bit more explanations. if I understand correctly ,I need to do; 1. backup image E: (full backup) 2. backup image E: -mode=incremental (only new files are backup , fast backup I want to use (test) the restore with option imagetofile Restore image E: F:\diskE.iso -imagetofile -incremental –deletefiles So NO need for regular incremental backup ??? T.I.A Best Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 10:18 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Hello Robert, Backup image is a full image done at block level. When specifiying mode=incremental, il a file level incremental that is done : only files having a modified date later than the previous backup image are backed up. The -deletefiles flag when restoring an image backup is only to be used when backup of the same volume is done twice : block level (image backup) and file level (regular forever incremental). See this excellent presentation (from slide 28) : http://tsm-symposium.oucs.ox.ac.uk/2007/papers/Andy%20Raibeck%20-%20Potpourri%20du%20Backup.pdf -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Juin 2015 04:47:33 Objet: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Hi to all Question for people using BACKUP AND RESTORE IMAGE I have a Windows client with millions of files and I am thinking of using backup image on it. Some questions , after the first backup image of disk E: (full Image) as : backup image E: In the documentation I can use after it and incremental backup image as: backup image E: -mode=incrementalCORRECT ? Of course the content of disk E: will change, files will be added and deleted. So the correct syntax for restoring the image will be:Restore image E: X: -incremental–deletefiles Any advice will be appreciate Best Regards Robert Ouzen Haifa University
Re: Backup and restore question
Hello Robert, Backup image is a full image done at block level. When specifiying mode=incremental, il a file level incremental that is done : only files having a modified date later than the previous backup image are backed up. The -deletefiles flag when restoring an image backup is only to be used when backup of the same volume is done twice : block level (image backup) and file level (regular forever incremental). See this excellent presentation (from slide 28) : http://tsm-symposium.oucs.ox.ac.uk/2007/papers/Andy%20Raibeck%20-%20Potpourri%20du%20Backup.pdf -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Juin 2015 04:47:33 Objet: [ADSM-L] Backup and restore question Hi to all Question for people using BACKUP AND RESTORE IMAGE I have a Windows client with millions of files and I am thinking of using backup image on it. Some questions , after the first backup image of disk E: (full Image) as : backup image E: In the documentation I can use after it and incremental backup image as: backup image E: -mode=incrementalCORRECT ? Of course the content of disk E: will change, files will be added and deleted. So the correct syntax for restoring the image will be:Restore image E: X: -incremental–deletefiles Any advice will be appreciate Best Regards Robert Ouzen Haifa University
