status (you can display before and after with Q DRM xx,
status should probably be VAULT).
Kudos to you for filling in!
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jon Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
TSM successfully checked out our list of 20 offsite volumes, but failed to
send 8 of them
Hello,
TSM successfully checked out our list of 20 offsite volumes, but failed to send
8 of them to the CAP (CAP was full of incoming scratch volumes, I think). Now,
all I know is the volume names that I need and their slot numbers, but since
TSM doesn't see them, I can't figure out how to get
Good morning,
While performing a restore in the GUI, I noticed that the modified and
created dates are blank for several files, including one I am attempting
to restore. When I attempt to restore the file, it fails with a
Structured file data type is unknown. Is this simply a matter of a
corrupt
direction? I am only backing up someone who's on vacation,
but I have all the rights to be very dangerous - just not the knowledge.
Thanks,
Jon Adams
Premera Blue Cross
Mountlake Terrace WA
425-918-5770
Hi,
I am covering for our TSM Admin this week and ran into something I
haven't had to do in a while. We have a defective tape that has been
physically removed from a drive in library. Once removed, I see that it
is physically damaged and cannot be used again.
I believe I know how to check it
is your TSM version? You may need remove the drive and define it
again.
Wira
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jon
Adams
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 7:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Restoring Drive Paths
Hello,
I
That worked perfectly! I think I was in fact getting caught by that
double t in DESTTYPE=DRIVE. Thank you very much. As usual, this
group comes to the rescue in our time of need.
___
Thanks, and have a great day!
- Jon
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
Hello,
I am backing my colleague up while he is on vacation. I had a tape
malfunction yesterday. I successfully removed the tape from the drive
and checked it back in as scratch (it was not an output volume) and
marked the drive online. and the put the drive online. However, the
path is down.
and links as documented by MS. Here is a sample of what we did.
DFSCMD /VIEW \\ad.corp1.com\Root1 /BATCH C:\DFSBackup\DFSRestore.bat
Jon Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be the DFS shares on the target clients.
___
With regards,
- Jon
-Original Message
and DFS
Are you talking about the server with the DFS Root and the DFS links? Or do
you mean the server that the shares are on? If the shares are being backed
up via another system then it might be that someone manaully backed it up
while the links were mapped.
More clarification please?
Jon
Anyone have anything on TSM and Windows DFS? We're trying to exclude the
DFS shares (for obvious reason) and not having any luck. Interestingly
enough, we get this when querying includes/excludes, but can find no
documentation that states how you would provide a DFS include/exclude:
Excl All
Hello everyone. I have an interesting scenario to ask you about. We have
the TSM Client v5.2.1 or v5.2.2 installed on over 700 Windows servers
including versions 4.0, 2000 and recently 2003. The TSM host runs on AIX
v5.1 and TSM server v5.1.7.3. It also happens on another of our TSM severs
From what I can tell, Tivoli says that we can do non-authoritative domain
controller restores only. However, while they may not support it, what does
anyone actually know about doing it? I don't want to look at another
product just to backup my domain controllers while TSM works for everything
it authoritative by running
the NTDSUTIL command supplied by Microsoft.
Bill boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jon Adams
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows 2000 Domain Controller Authoritative
Thank you for your reply Richard.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Security
IT Security is getting on me to provide better security for TSM server, the
TSM Clients, the Tape
I just realized that you are the same Richard that also replied to my
security issue posting as well [lol]. Anyway, regarding this server,
apparently it is a exhibiting massive errors on it's switch port and we now
think it's either the NIC or the NIC drivers. Again, thanks for your reply.
Hello folks,
IT Security is getting on me to provide better security for TSM server, the
TSM Clients, the Tape Library and, most importantly, the filespace. I
cannot find very much documentation on security other than ports used
through a firewall and passwordaccess generate options (I hear we
Richard, thank you for replying. I don't do much with the server end, but
will take your advice and gather some information from the TSM server
activity log. No other server client is exhibiting this error (out of 400+)
so I spent most of my time troubleshooting the client. I have the network
Folks, I am getting a server that fails it's backups. It appears to hang
for days if you let it (and it has on one weekend). In the past, I have had
similar errors and found that the NIC had been set to 100MBit and half
duplex, which does not match the switch. I set it to full duplex and the
The DSM.OPT is only read when the scheduler has been restarted (for
automatic backups) or when the manual or web interface is stopped (if it was
running when you modified the DSM.OPT) and started again.
-Original Message-
From: Nelson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Jon Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Client Licensing
Hello everyone,
Can anyone confirm that if your TSM server is not quite current on client
licensing
Hello everyone,
Can anyone confirm that if your TSM server is not quite current on client
licensing (the request just went up to Purchasing), nodes can still be
created, associated and backed up or restored, though the server license
compliance status states failed? Are there ANY issues other
Thank you Jim. I will add this to the followong reasons I just learned a
few moments ago:
Botched Schema update
Accidental deletion of OU (or any other object)
Database corruption
System State
Accidentally deletion of a DNS zone
Some DC's are also File/Print servers, DHCP, etc.
Some of these
requirements. Not to mention, you'd have to come up with
a script that modified the dsm.opt for each user upon login. Yuk.
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer
IT IPS, Premera Blue Cross
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL
Perhaps a combination of the randomization, the backup window or the
available sessions at the time of backup? If there are no sessions
available, the backup will start anytime a session is available within that
schedule window.
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer
IT IPS, Premera Blue Cross
Windows 2K Cluster
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jon Adams
Though I have successfully implemented the TSM Client solution on our
clustered servers, I do not appear to have the ability to restore them via
GUI. From the GUI, any cluster shared resources DO
Here's an interesting question: why would you want to backup a DC,
especially where you have a DC (W2K) or two in every remote site of the WAN?
Why/what would you ever restore that you wouldn't get from the other domain
controllers if one or even a few are down?
I ask this because my theory is
I see you have your answer (in short, it is YES), but wanted to bring to
your attention of an issue I had to find out the hard way:
Follow the directions in the book for proper installation and configuration
of the cluster-aware generic service resource but, be aware that there is
a typo in the
Well, since Tivoli has officially cut support for 4.1.1, I have, what I hope
to be, a simple question:
TSM Server v4.1.4.5 running on AIX v4.3.3, supporting Windows client v4.1.1
**
Though I have successfully implemented the
You did not mention client/server O/S platforms, but if you go to the
following URL and select your O/S, I beleive you'll locate your answers:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/compatibility.html
-Original Message-
From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Go to this URL - it will show you virtually ALL of the commands available
(locate SHOW to begin with that category as they are alphabetically
listed), plus quite a few that are not documented. It is a very extensive
list, so be patient while the entire page loads.
I would recommend Getting Started with Tivoli Storage Manager:
Implementation Guide. This an IBM Redbook, id# SG24-5416-01, I believe. I
still use this frequently for reference on a variety of levels. Good luck.
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer
Premera Blue Cross
Mountlake Terrace, WA
425-670-5770
Don't forget to check the Client Option Set as well. You may have an option
in there for DOMAIN ALL-LOCAL and it may even be set to NOT allow overrides
from clients (been there). ;)
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:47 AM
to the DST error in some client versions (see APAR IC28544),
- when the client's admin changed the ACLs on all files on the client,
- when a filespace was renamed on the client,
- ...
I do not think, that this is a TSM database problem.
Jon Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Here's
Title: Message
Here's an
interesting one for us: periodically, a client will "decide" to perform a full
backup during a scheduled incremental, regardless of existing file spaces or
status of the client files or optionsin any way, shape or form. Does
anyone know of any setting orissue that would
This should be easy, but apparently I cannot locate a confirmed answer on
this one - during client backup, which is read first?
__
Regards,
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer II
BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
425.670.5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have the right
is not
interested in waiting hours for what should be minutes for a daily
incremental.
__
Regards,
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer II
BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
425.670.5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say
LOCAL and
commencing the backup periodically themselves. However, TSM attempts to
backup everything every time! I have no Management Classes that would
dictate such a thing to occur. Any idea's or or similar experiences?
__
Regards,
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer II
BST
benefit. Thank you.
__
Regards,
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer II
BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
425.670.5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be
misquoted then used against you.
And you still only backup the .PST as a standard file, probably already on a
file server or PC. MS Backup, TSM or a TSM DPA does not proved further
abilities.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL
0.0000.0 0
EndTxn Verb 1.596 29.6 54
Client Cleanup 1.297 1297.0 1
__
Regards,
Jon Adams
Systems Engineer II
BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
425.670.5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Good morning everyone. I'm wondering if anyone has experienced the
following error?
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Perflib
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1011
Date: 06/01/2001
Time: 01:37:01
User: N/A
Computer: MTLK15
Description:
The library
You may leave the list at any time by sending a SIGNOFF ADSM-L command
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
-Original Message-
From: Area Técnica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unsuscribe to List
Could you tell me
Formally by Sterling Software, SAMS: Vantage.
Now called CA-Vantage, TSM Interface by CA. Computer Associates recently
acquired Sterling.
Here is the link:
http://www.cai.com/products/sams/ca_vantage_tsm.htm
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nuval [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Is it possible that the spaces should be identified in ASCII (ALT + 255)?
-Original Message-
From: Short, Anne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Another cloptset Question regarding inclexcl
I've been trying to create
Does anyone have a copy of a goo, working NT 4.0 OPT file? I am having
difficulty getting my INcludes/EXcludes working properly. We are using TSM
version 3.7 on an MVS O/S 390 system with TSM version 3.x and 4.x NT
clients. My next step is getting it to work on our W2K platforms against
4.11
46 matches
Mail list logo
