Thanks for your contribution Zoltan!. Best wishes for a similar adventure in
your new environment
See you, bye.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Per conto di Zoltan Forray
Inviato: mercoledì 24 maggio 2023 22:01
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: [ADSM-L] Good Bye
Folks,
Same issue in my environment: these ba clients seems too old from 5.5 to all
6.2 clients. I found the nodes with:
select * from actlog where (msgno='428' and severity='W' and
originator='SERVER' and DATE_TIME >=current_timestamp -24 hours)
I have tried the REG ADMIN and the use of
I need to use different syntax from the one of Eric, like:
select * from (select count(*) as "Number_Of_Failed" from events where
scheduled_start>current_timestamp-24 hours and status='Failed') as failed,
(select count(*) as "Number_Of_Missed" from events where
I think there isn't a way currently to get the real phisical occupancy in
directory pools.
You have to use the GENERATE | QUERY DEDUPSSTAT ad use the
last two colums in a Excel.
Cheers.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di PAC
pointless.
Efim
> 20 сент. 2018 г., в 11:29, Tommaso Bollini написал(а):
>
> @Efim
> the .snapshot (or ~snapshot) folders are NetApp construct recognized by the
> BA Spectrum agent api:
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEQVQ_8.1.2/client/r_o
> pt_snap
snapshot on the Netapp device,
>> but instead, make use of a snapshot that had been created previously by some
>> internal mechanism of the Netapp.
>> Therefore, it seems very unlikely that any process still has a grip on any
>> of the files being part of this snapshot ...
>
Hello Arnaud, maybe it would be: The NetApp snapshot indicates which files are
modified on the LUN (for which their backup is triggered); but the
Backup-Archive client cannot "take" them because they are locked by the
application.
Perhaps you can solve by inserting the appropiate rules in
fix levels are available. The article says AIX but
affected me on RHEL6/7
On 5/23/2018 11:09 AM, Tommaso Bollini wrote:
> Hi Eric, yes I can do db2start or log on with the instance user on DB2. My
> get dbm cfg output is below.
> I've found that the stash file, it is written by the ser
a db2start command?
If you can start db2 successful, do you receive output from the following
command:
$ db2 get dbm cfg
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tommaso Bo
iled
> during a TSM server upgrade. This can be fixed by running the command
> /opt/tivoli/tsm/db2/instance/db2iupdt Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
size, 143 bytes
security plugin encountered an error
User: tsmadmin
File: /home/tsmadmin/sqllib/tsmdbdata.TSMDB1
Error: Error reading contents of digest file.
Infact:
/home/tsmadmin/sqllib/tsmdbdata.TSMDB1: empty
Do you know how can correct this situation?
Regards.
Tommaso Bollini
nt
for a quotation?
I believe that the future of this product is still in waters made of complexity
and difficulty in management and...Error is only human, but to persist in it,
is diabolical!
Sorry for my poor english. Here speak a disappointed SP (TSM) fan.
______
doesn't work, please open a PMR.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 02/12/2018
12:09:37 PM:
> From: Tommaso Bollini <t.boll...@vargroup.it>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 02/12/2018 12:10
an incorrect server configuration, or is it a
CA Sign Cert. problem?
Regards,
Tommaso Bollini
Backup and Data Protection
Tel: + 39 0571 998016
Mob: +39 335 1042184
www.vargroup.it
AVVISO SULLA TUTELA DI INFORMAZIONI RISERVATE
Questo messaggio è stato spedito da Var Group S.p.A. o da una delle
You can always do a: q vm * -detail by dsmc.
So you can build a macro or command file to let it write the output into a
file (or maybe Db, share..)
Regards.
Tommaso Bollini
Backup and Data Protection
Tel: + 39 0571 998016
Mob: +39 335 1042184
www.vargroup.it
AVVISO SULLA TUTELA DI
retention
at which the node belong to.
An other idea could be the use of archive instead of progressive
incremental
An other way the use of 'backup group' but for me, it is too much complex
in case of restores...
Kindly regards.
Tommaso Bollini
Backup and Data Protection
Tel: + 39 0571 99801
16 matches
Mail list logo