Hi,
Yes, SQL Server 2019 support is scheduled for release soon.
SQL Server 2019 itself just official GA'd on November 4th.
IBM has been testing this with "pre-release" versions of SQL Server 2019,
but needs to complete the full regression testing with the official GA
version.
So, this is
Agreed. But yes, my DBA asked me about it yesterday. They just put up a
2019 server and installed MS-SQL 2019 this morning. They already have
departments/users asking to migrate to it. Not sure how they are going to
handle the backups without TDP.
Is anyone from IBM still monitoring ADSM-L?
Zoltan,
Yea, I do not recall seeing anything on 2019 either, fortunately my DBA's
having asked (yet).
I do like the "all requirements" approach though, kind of provides a one-stop
for links to all the supported revisions. It beats the heck out of searching
for each individual release.
Thank
Rick,
Thanks for the reply. I guess I should have mentioned I did find those
documents. So I guess I am waiting for IBM to chime in as to when they
expect to have backup support for MS-SQL 2019 out? We tried installing the
8.1.8 TDP but it said it only supported as high as 2017!
On Wed, Nov
Zoltan,
This doc provides links to the hardware and software requirements for all
versions of Spectrum Protect for Databases:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-spectrum-protect%E2%84%A2-databases-all-requirements-documents
More specifically this is the link to that information as it
You would need to add an exclude.dir statement to your include/exclude
list:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEQVQ_8.1.7/client/r_opt_exclude.html
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:59:04AM -0500, yoda woya wrote:
> I am using the Domain ALL-NSF to backup this device but need to
>
First off, I am wondering if this listserv is active at all. I have posted
a couple of questions and received absolutely no responses and the amount
of other posts is almost non-existent . I see more activity on www.adsm.org
and it's link to ADSM-L Mailing lists posts/archives seem to have
We are backing up one with ba client over nfs.
Its fairly large so this is slow.
I don't believe its capable of ndmp. Does anyone backup qumulo using some
other method? I know I could setup several nfs mounts and breakup the
directory tree...but i think this would be somewhat complicated.
I am using the Domain ALL-NSF to backup this device but need to
exclude /var/echo360/.snapshot/. where/what would be the syntax of the
exclude statement to accomplish this. Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:17 AM yoda woya wrote:
> Thanks for the lead.
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 10:30 AM
Thanks for the lead.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 10:30 AM Skylar Thompson wrote:
> You'll need to change your NFS mount options, or improve the
> network/storage so that you're not experiencing timeouts. Note that this is
> just speculation - there isn't enough information to know whether it's the
>
You'll need to change your NFS mount options, or improve the
network/storage so that you're not experiencing timeouts. Note that this is
just speculation - there isn't enough information to know whether it's the
case. You don't say what OS you're using, but NFS timeouts would generally
show up
Any idea on how to mitigate that and instruct TSM to proceed. Thank you.
11/06/2019 00:32:26 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
11/06/2019 00:32:26 Total number of objects inspected: 174,098
11/06/2019 00:32:26 Total number of objects backed up: 173,575
11/06/2019 00:32:26 Total number of
Assuming that you're able to access the mount independently of backups, my
best guess would be that you have a soft mount and are experiencing a
timeout.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 04:07:01AM -0400, yoda woya wrote:
> Any reason why TSM would think that my NFS mount is stale:
>
> 11/02/2019 00:32:47
RHEL has become too expensive for us (even before IBM bought them) so we
started a university-wide project to migrate all RHEL servers to CentOS
with the exception of servers with vendor applications that don't support
CentOS.
This includes IBM / ISP but the "IBM Spectrum Protect Supported
Any reason why TSM would think that my NFS mount is stale:
11/02/2019 00:32:47 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
11/02/2019 00:32:47 Total number of objects inspected: 163,326
11/02/2019 00:32:47 Total number of objects backed up: 162,913
11/02/2019 00:32:47 Total number of objects updated:
We have spent the better part of this week trying to export a node from one
server to another. It is constantly failing with server lock issues,
requiring us to restart it. Then when it finishes, there are lots of
"objects that are part of incomplete groups" being deleted when it
finishes?
Whenever I execute "dsmc incremental" only "/" gets backup. /boot, /home/,
and /var/echo360 do not get backup even though I specify Domain All-Local
in dsm.sys. How can I fix that problem? Thank you
[root@echo /]# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
I see that all the time where there is a difference between the export and
import totals - sometimes 2-3 objects (or more) difference - sometimes
occupancy totals varying a little. A long time ago when I first saw
such a difference, I reran the export with mergefilespace and it still
didn't
I just finished exporting a linux server changing hardware and decommissioning
a tsm server.
The original node on server x has 4,000,798 objects.
The import on server y has 4,000,797 objects.
I calculated the number with the following sql statement
Select sum(num_fules) from occupancy where
You can't convert, you have to retrieve to disk and re-archive to Spectrum.
I've done this for other systems and also moved archives from Spectrum
Protect to other systems.
Scripting is what I used, inventory all the archives via a script and
create a script that retrieves them to a logical
I have been asked to move a departmental system into our central Spectrum
Protect backup system. The departmental system is running an open-source backup
product called Bareos, which is a fork of Backula. Anybody done anything like
this?
I assume there is no practical way to simply import the
Team
Would appreciate if you can vote for below RFE to address schedule overlap
issue with Fourth and Last Week of the month.
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=135079
>
> Regards
> Sarav
> +65 9857 8665
>
Hi,
you can use the VMMC and VMCTLMC options to use a differing management class.
Please have a look at the Docs
(https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSERB6_8.1.8/ve.inst/r_ve_mount_tape.html).
You definitively need to store your control files on a non tape storage. We
ran into
On 2019-09-27 20:24, Lee, Gary wrote:
> Is this normal?Tsm 7.1.7.1, running on redhat 6.9.
>
> Deleting a windows 2008r2 node's data using delete filespace. Killed
> the process after 5.5 hours ad 34 million ojects. Restarted this
> morning, has been running for 6 hours and says it has deleted
Thanks. Forgot about q occ.
Nothing huge, maybe its almost done.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Skylar
Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 2:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] very large number of objects being deleted
I would
Hi there,
I currently have a basic TSM4VE implementation setup that backs up to our
VTL by default. I have a requirement now though to back up some VM's and
templates directly to physical tape. I'm not 100% sure how to achieve this.
Do I create a new data mover node for this? How do I backup to a
I would start with a QUERY OCCUPANCY for the node on the TSM server to
figure out which filespaces have lots of objects, and whether the BA client
was responsible for them, or some other client type. You could also try
looking at the client logs, if you have access to them.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019
Is this normal?Tsm 7.1.7.1, running on redhat 6.9.
Deleting a windows 2008r2 node's data using delete filespace.
Killed the process after 5.5 hours ad 34 million ojects.
Restarted this morning, has been running for 6 hours and says it has deleted
over 88 million objects.
There is only 500 gB of
Yep, that's been our experience as well. At least for LTO, I believe the
VOLSER is written unencrypted so both the library manager and clients can
read it, while the storage pool data are encrypted using the key in the
client database.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:35:15AM -0400, Zoltan Forray
We need to discontinue one of our servers that is an LM and want to make
sure there aren't any gotchas.
The last time I did this many years ago, the process was fairly
straightforward (checkout tapes, define library, paths, drives on target
server, check-in tapes on target server, redo all
I have asked IBM at the SP Symposium in Germany two years ago what I should
expect performance wise when I run my SP server as a VM.
They gave me an indication of -20% from the blueprints based on blueprints
hardware + vSphere 6.5 or higher.
I've been running a few SP servers in our cloud
Zoltan,
As I understand it IBM does support virtual ISP servers but I recall seeing a
document that stated they will not support their performance or scalability, so
for a small application it is probably fine.
My management team requested that I move our operation virtual (VMware) roughly
2
Hi Eric,
No inbound deduplication on the clients and right now for the existing 6
nodes there is a total of 2TB of occupancy and we do not expect much if any
growth.
---
Zoltan Forray
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
VMware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
Hi Zoltan,
I don't know if it's supported by IBM, but I think it's all related to load. A
VM will not provide the same I/O performance as dedicated hardware does. So if
you are planning to install a server with inbound deduplication with container
pools, I would stay away from virtualization.
Hi Stefan,
At the time the servers were installed Redhat 6.4 was our standard. The servers
need to be upgraded to the latest 6.x release first before we can upgrade TSM
to 8.1.x. But before making any changes to the environment while we have a case
open at IBM, I need to be sure there is a
We have an old hardware based ISP server that needs to be replace. It is
PCI network isolated and only backs up 6-PCI servers. We are thinking about
recreating it as a VM since there aren't any hardware-based requirements
(e.g. tape drives).
Anyone running an ISP server as a VM? What are the
Very strange issue indeed Eric, I have never heard of a specific client
causing slowdowns, I would understand if it where a massive amount of
oracle sessions starting but if it's really platform and not session count
related it would have to be something that IBM needs to look into I guess.
May I
Morning All
We have configured our SP servers to use LDAP but occasionally see errors upon
server start-up. Unfortunately it appears that if the LDAP lookups fail then
this prevents SP from starting.
21-08-2019 19:36:54 ANR3339I Default Label in key data base is TSM Server
Hi Stefan,
There is no noticable impact on the TSM performance when we use the tsmdiskperf
tool on the database volumes.
We recently discovered the issue seems to be related to the TDP for Oracle
clients. When none are running the server response is OK, even during a
reasonable load. But as
Eric,
What happens when you benchmark the DB volumes using the tool provided with
the blueprints on an idle system, does the system also slow down with
commands such as q stgpool or does it stay fast when the benchmark is
running on all volumes?
Also, what kind of a result does the benchmark give
Hi Eric,
These seem to be default values when installing Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server
7.3.
I checked several other machines, all are having the same value.
And following page
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55428812/how-the-values-of-kernel-parameters-are-defined
seems to confirm my
Hi Arnoud,
I do not understand why your max seg size (kbytes) = 18014398509465599 and max
total shared memory (kbytes) = 18014397435740096 are so huge. If you have 256
GB RAM, like I do, I would expect max seg size (kbytes) = 268435456 and max
total shared memory (kbytes) = 268435456.
Thanks
Hi Rick,
Following to your question, I realized that I erroneously stated "Isilon"
instead of "Storwize".
Probably due to the fact that I've been stressed quite a lot with these
devices, when we initially started setting up a new Spectrum environment,
making use of Isilon devices as a
Arnaud,
Apologies for off topic question but what series nodes are you using in the
Isilon?
Thank you,
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of PAC Brion
Arnaud
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 3:02 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]
Hi Eric,
Any reason why your kernel.msgmni = 196608 from the /etc/sysyctl.conf differs
from the max queues system wide = 516096 from a ipcs -l?
Just curious...
Thanks for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Hi Eric,
Running 4 TSM servers at 8.1.6.1 (PowerLinux servers with 256 GB RAM), and
making use of directory-container storage pools only.
No server performance or responsiveness issues here anymore, since we changed
our storage to make use of IBM Isilon.
Here my values :
vmstat 1
procs
Hi - FYI.
Got 3 TSM v8.1.1.0 servers. Srry, no directory containers.
Two are mostly idle ATM, and vmstat 1 B column shows all zeroes on these.
But, the 3rd which is the primary backup server is currently serving
main backup window with 4 data migration to tape processes active ATM so
it is
We were having performance issues. I still think there are some. I could tell
it was having issues when Q PR took way too long to show- if at all. But much
improved now after RAM increase.
Specs for our environment:
SP 8.1.4.0
IBM 750- AIX 7.2
3.1 TB DB on SSD
128GB RAM increased to 180GB
DR
Get all zeros...
We have these settings on a dell730:
ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system wide = 516096
max size of message (bytes) = 65536
default max size of queue (bytes) = 65536
-- Shared Memory Limits
max number of segments = 129024
max seg size (kbytes)
Hi guys,
A few weeks ago I already wrote about the severe performance issues we have
with our TSM 7.1 servers. In the 'old days' we used to back up our clients to
TSM 6.3 servers with Data Domains attached. Smaller clients backed up through
the LAN, large ones through the SAN.
Our newer
For those of you interested: IBM updated the Blueprints to 4.1 recently:
http://ibm.biz/IBMSpectrumProtectBlueprints
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
For information, services and offers, please visit our web
> I have a backup client where I had tried out the 8.1.4 BACLIENT and SQL
> agent, but it failed because I did not realize that the server had SQL 2008
> on it (too old for 8.1.4). I then downgraded back to 7.1.6.5 for both
> BACLIENT and SQL agent, but now I keep getting these errors:
>
Hello Everyone
Does anyone know when Spectrum Protect release feature to replicate meta data
between TSM servers for data resides in Object storage ?
Regards
Sarav
+65 9857 8665
Yes, there are instructions nominally for Windows Server 2016 and Windows
10, that will also work for Windows Server 2019. Please refer to the
"launching pad" page (linked below) which has links to separate documents
for (a) best practices for backing up Windows, (b) creating WinPE recovery
media,
Are there any updates to the bare metal recovery process detailed here
(which only mentions 2012, not 2016 or 2019)
I see in the maintenance branch (not patches) there is a BACLIENT 8.1.8.0
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v8r1/Windows/x64/v818/
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:07 PM Tom Alverson wrote:
> I see there is a new 8.1.8.1 version now on the FTP site, but the
I see there is a new 8.1.8.1 version now on the FTP site, but the name now
has HSM in it instead of BAC ? Is this the same thing just a newer
version? The one called HSM is much smaller. Here are the two links:
Yeah, you're right. I dug into OneProtect a bit this week and it only supports
B/A clients and backup objects.
So yep, only option is to do dumps to disk for the longer term backups.
Thanks
__
Matthew McGeary
Service Delivery Manager / Solutions Architect
Data Center &
I could not find anything on the web about using ISP to backup Oracle NOSQL
DB's and the Oracle TDP hasn't been updated since 8.1.0.2 patch.
Any thoughts on this? Any plans for IBM ISP to support these?
--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
VMware
I think one protect only works for B/A clients and VM's, not for TDP's, but
I could be wrong or that information might be outdated (I think this was
the case for 8.1.7).
So i'm thinking this might require dumps to disk and archives with removal
via the B/A client for the montly's and yearly's.
Folks,
We are currently in the process of building out a S4 Hana environment as an ERP
replacement and I have a requirement from business to retain backups of the S4
databases for the following periods:
Daily incrementals - 30 days
Weekly fulls - 90 days
Monthly fulls - 1 year
Yearly fulls - 7
Hello Eric,
no, definitely not. TSM-Instance is responding promptly. When the big DBs
are backung up, there are always the other takeing their backup and every 30
minutes all DBs are performing their archive log backup. So, every second
there is a session open or close, additional traffic by
Hi Michael,
When you have large databases backing up, do you also experience long session
initiation times? In my case it takes sometimes 30 to 50 seconds to get a
prompt with a dsmadmc. Same for each client session.
We use TDP for SAP (Oracle database), TDP for SAP HANA and TDP for Oracle
Hello Eric,
that's exactly what I oberserved too. The moment I moved the big DB's away
fom the server, the performance raised dramatically.
Your SAP is on an Oracle-DB, and you are using TDP ERP with RMAN to backup
up the database?
I ask because we are experimenting with some paramenters in
Hi Michael,
We are using Linux server. The server is sized according to the Blueprints
(Large server config). We send all our data to the container pool. It's a mix
of BA (Linux and Windows), SQL Server, SAP, Oracle and Lotus Notes clients.
Like I stated earlier, the performance issue seems to
Hi Del,
Thank you very much again for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: vrijdag 19 juli 2019 20:32
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
Appreciate the input Del, thanks !
Thank you,
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Del Hoobler
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 2:32 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] deletion performance of large deduplicated files
* This email
Hi Eric and all,
We are aware of this situation and putting additional focus and attention
on it.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/19/2019
09:35:37 AM:
> From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
OK. Thanks. Michael. We'll give it a try.
Chris Kizzire
Backup Administrator (Network Engineer II)
BROOKWOOD BAPTIST HEALTH
Information Systems
O: 205.820.5973
chris.kizz...@bhsala.com
BROOKWOODBAPTISTHEALTH.COM
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Michael
Hello Eric,
could you describe a bit you server setup?
What type of data are you storing? SQL (which), VM, File, ...
Is everything going into one dedup pool or are they split for different types
of data?
I assume your TSM-servers run on AIX.
In general, performant backup and restore is no
Chris,
yours is easy to answer: You have a performance problem, not a TSM problem.
For VM-backup I have a dedicated LPAR in a S842, 3vCPU, 128GB RAM, SR-IOV
10GB. Storage is a V7000, SSD/SAS. There has never been a backup or restore
problem performance wise, everything is running with
Hi Rick and others!
I replicated the data of the test TDP client to multiple servers, running
7.1.7, 7.1.9 and even 8.1.8: the performance sucks on all servers.
We do not use client replication as part of our server protection. We need a
real time replication over the datacenter and thus we
Alas... we are not the only ones I knew it...
We went from TSM 6.3 to SP 8.1.4.0. Performance is 5 times slower in the new
Environment overall. We use Container Pools, Dedup, & Compression. We use SP
for VE for most VM's. Baclient & SQL for physical machines & vm's w/ SQL.
It took about 17
Eric, Michael,
I have been working through similar struggles and as I read your posts had to
wonder, can you provide some details on your server and client versions?
Basically I now have experience/exposure to every version/maintenance
pack/patch SP has put out since 7.1.3.x
My servers are now
Hello Eric,
welcome to my nightmares. Take a seat, wanna have a drink?
I had the pleasure of performance and data corruption PMRs during the last two
years with TDP Oracle. Yes, at first the customer got blamed for not adhering
completely to to blueprints, but after some weeks it boild down to
Hi TSM/SP-ers,
We are struggling with the performance of our TSM servers for months now. We
are running several servers with hardware (Data Domain) dedup for years without
any problems, but on our new servers with directory container pools performance
is really, really bad.
The servers and
Eric,
Just seen Andy's reply and learned something new. Thanks Andy.
Sorry for the misinfo.
Thank you,
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: Rick Adamson
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 7:59 AM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: How to make dsmc recognize drives
Eric,
My
Eric,
My understanding is the substitute (subst) command is only defining an alias
for the full path to a location on a drive not actually creating a new drive or
file space. Think about it in the context of creating a share except using a
drive letter versus an alpha-numeric string.
The data
Hi Andy,
That was it! As soon as I open an elevated cmd, a backup works fine.
Thanks again for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew
Raibeck
Sent:
Hi Eric,
It seems to work for me. Example shown below. In the mean time, is it
possible that Windows UAC could be involved? Try opening a Windows OS
prompt with the "Run as Administrator" option, then try running a sequence
of commands like I show below
Hi guys,
For some tests I want to create separate drives in Windows and back them up
with SP. I create these drives with the subst command (subst D: c:\). The drives created are visible in the Windows GUI and accessible
through the Windows command line, but the Spectrum Protect client does not
Hi guys,
To everybody who responded: thank you very much for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron
Delaware
Sent: donderdag 11 juli 2019 17:43
To:
Hi Eric,
These should give you what you are looking for
echo
""
echo "* Node Activities - How many volumes each client has data data11*"
select count(DISTINCT volume_name) as Num_volumes, node_name, stgpool_name
from
Hi Eric,
Stefan's method will be quicker than mine, smaller table to parse.
-
Thanks,
Marc...
___
Marc Lanteigne
Spectrum Protect Specialist AVP / SRT
416.478.0233 | marclantei...@ca.ibm.com
Summer Hours: Monday to Thursday, 6:00 to 16:30 Eastern
Hi Eric,
i'd suggest "select node_name,count(distinct volume_name) from volumeusage
group by node_name".
You could also further filter with "where stgpool_name..." or "where
copy_type='BACKUP'/'ARCHIVE'"
Best Regards,
Stefan Schulz
CANCOM GmbH
CANCOM GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Hi Eric,
You could do something like this:
select node_name,count(distinct(volume_name)) from contents group by
node_name
-
Thanks,
Marc...
___
Marc Lanteigne
Spectrum Protect Specialist AVP / SRT
416.478.0233 | marclantei...@ca.ibm.com
Summer
Hi guys,
I'm looking for a SQL statement to count the amount of volumes used per client.
Can anybody help me out here?
Thank you very much in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
For information, services
Well, I don't think that's correct Rick. :-)
The data is deduplicated and compressed at the source and only the new
chunks are replicated to the target daily but the data reduction
information on the target storagepool is based on the managed data figures
just like at the source and they are the
Stefan,
I understand it as Karel.
The replicate (or protect stg) process data is deduplicated at the source.
It would be inefficient to consume network bandwidth sending duplicate extents.
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Stefan
Folkerts
Thanks, Del
I have requested them to do so.
- Bent
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Del Hoobler
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect PVU licensing
Hi Bent,
Please have the auditors contact me
Hi Bent,
Please have the auditors contact me directly ASAP.
Thank you.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/08/2019
11:08:58 AM:
> From: "Bent Christensen (BVC)"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 07/08/2019 11:15 AM
> Subject:
Hi,
We are just going through an IBM license audit and to our overwhelming
astonishment the IBM auditors want to charge us for licenses for test nodes -
that is, the computers where we test the installation of new fix packs and
interim fixes before deploying to our production environment.
In
Hi Erwann,
Out of simplicity. If you install a new TSM server and use an existing key
database, you won't have to add the certificates from all other servers.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
I don't think that's how it works Karel, the values are based on managed
data and are normally around the same on the source and on the target.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:16 AM Karel Bos wrote:
> As the target server only receives already dedupped data it makes sense
> their will be no or barely
As the target server only receives already dedupped data it makes sense
their will be no or barely anything to be dedupped.
Regards,
Karel
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 08:16, Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing something very strange at a customer site that has two Spectrum
> Protect
Hi all,
I'm seeing something very strange at a customer site that has two Spectrum
Protect servers.
One receives backups and is the replication source.
The other is the replication target for that single source and doesn't
receive any backup data.
All data goes into a single containerpool on each
Hi Eric,
Why do you want to do that ? What are you trying to do ?
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM"
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Juillet 2019 09:17:04
Objet: [ADSM-L] Using same cert.kdb on
Hi guys,
Does somebody know if it is possible to use the same cert.kdb on all servers?
So I create one on one server with the certificate of all other servers in it
and then copy it to all other servers?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage &
ISP 7.1.7.400 on Linux - Back a while ago, we were working to eliminate an
ISP server. So, we removed replication from all of the nodes (or so we
thought) and removed the target replication server.
Well, somewhere along the way, it didn't completely/successfully remove
replication from one of
Don't know, we never had the hardware to do server replication.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 12:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading 1-server in complex to 8.12+
Thanks. That is what
701 - 800 of 97247 matches
Mail list logo
