Original Message
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
Of Gee, Norman Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
What is your opinion of placing the DB2 database on a DS8300 or any
other high end SAN
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:17:32 -0500, Richard Rhodes
rrho...@firstenergycorp.com said:
Recently (3 weeks ago) we had a meeting with IBM folks about TSM issues.
In talking about the coming v6.1 they said that TSM v5.5 would be rquired
for the upgrade to v6.1. Take it with a large grain of
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:56:33 -0800, Gee, Norman norman@lc.ca.gov
said:
I guess with the rumor conversion to DB2, it would no longer be
feasible to place the database on JBOD mirror by TSM. The
recommendation may be RAID 5 or 6 storage with fibre channel disks
and not SATA disks. Am I
We'll see what transition steps are actually required once the 6.1
announcement is made. Many customers (most?) are not at the 5.5
level; and having to establish that level before going on to 6 will be
a major hassle, if it is imposed, where IBM would have to commit to
making the 5.5 level
On Dec 22, 2008, at 21:16 , Richard Sims wrote:
We'll see what transition steps are actually required once the 6.1
announcement is made. Many customers (most?) are not at the 5.5
level; and having to establish that level before going on to 6 will be
a major hassle, if it is imposed, where IBM
On 21 dec 2008, at 08:56, Gee, Norman wrote:
I guess with the rumor conversion to DB2, it would no longer be
feasible
to place the database on JBOD mirror by TSM. The recommendation may
be
RAID 5 or 6 storage with fibre channel disks and not SATA disks. Am I
close?
Well, even with current
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:26 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
On 21 dec 2008, at 08:56, Gee, Norman wrote:
I guess with the rumor conversion to DB2, it would no longer be
feasible
19 december 2008 17:09
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
will it be possible ?
--
Fred Allen - I like long walks, especially when they are taken by
people who annoy me.
Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Gee, Norman
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
What is your opinion of placing the DB2 database on a DS8300 or any
other high end SAN? (RAID 5 only, all 15K drives) parity write overhead
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 9:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
What I'm interested in on the upgrade to DB2 is the disk requirements.
Will it . . .
- upgrade in place right over top of the existing TSM db? Using same
will it be possible ?
--
Fred Allen - I like long walks, especially when they are taken by
people who annoy me.
Hi Goc?,
well, 6.0 will never exist, IBM starts counting at 1, so it'll be 6.1 :)
Ss for the path, currently the beta-manual says that 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5
will be supported as a starting-point for an upgrade to 6.1, but IBM
might change their mind. There is a note that the upgrade tools have
the
:-) oh yea .. what i meant was 6.3 LOL
thanks, everything is crystal clear. was.
thanks again
i'm asking because we are in transition preparation from old hardware (p640)
and lto1/lto3 , to pXXX and lto4 and stuff and we are at server 541
//
g
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Remco Post
Subject
Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
12/19/2008 11:35
AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager
ads...@vm.marist
.EDU
Hi Goc?,
well, 6.0 will never
:To
Dist Stor ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Manager cc
ads...@vm.marist
.EDU Subject
Re: 5.4 -- 6.0
Stor cc
Manager
ads...@vm.marist Subject
.EDU Re: 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
12/19/2008 12:21
PM
Please respond
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] 5.4 -- 6.0 (server)
What I'm interested in on the upgrade to DB2 is the disk requirements.
Will it . . .
- upgrade in place right over top of the existing TSM db? Using same
17 matches
Mail list logo
