Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Karel
Bos
Sent: 15 07 2013 1:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
If you define volumes into a stg pool they get scratch=no and as such wont
return to scratch pool and relabel scratch isn't
Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait,
www.ahliunited.com.kw
-Original Message-
From: Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: 16 07 2013 12:46 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
Hello Karel,
Maybe you can help me to re-label scratch VTL volume
On Jul 16, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Grigori Solonovitch
grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.com wrote:
I have found the way to re-label existing scratch volumes in VTL:
checkout libvolume library volume remove=no - for all scratch volumes
label libvolume library search=yes labelsource=barcode
: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
On Jul 16, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Grigori Solonovitch
grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.com wrote:
I have found the way to re-label existing scratch volumes in VTL:
checkout libvolume library volume remove=no - for all scratch
volumes label libvolume
Hello everybody,
I have added additional volumes in Data Doamin VTL and checked in them by using
next command
checkin libvol library search=yes stat=scr checkl=barcode
After adding volumes I have found all of them from q vol in status Scratch
Volume?: No
As a result, all new volumes are not
, 2013 1:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
Hello everybody,
I have added additional volumes in Data Doamin VTL and checked in them by using
next command checkin libvol library search=yes stat=scr checkl=barcode After
adding volumes I have
15, 2013 1:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
Hello everybody,
I have added additional volumes in Data Doamin VTL and checked in them by using
next command checkin libvol library search=yes stat=scr checkl=barcode After
adding volumes I
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Robert Ouzen
Sent: 15 07 2013 1:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
Hi Grigori
Check your Data Domain VTL library has the function Relabel Scratch: Yes
q libr XX f=d
If you define volumes into a stg pool they get scratch=no and as such wont
return to scratch pool and relabel scratch isn't working on them.
Upd stg maxscatch= number big enough to hold all data plus some and delete
the defined empty ones to get relabel working.
Might want to enable reuse delay,
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:34 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
Hello Robert,
Thank you very much for fast
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Karel
Bos
Sent: 15 07 2013 1:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Relabaling empty volumes in DataDomain VTL
If you define volumes into a stg pool they get scratch=no and as such wont
return
] DataDomain VTL
All
Just to chip in here.
We have 3 DDR's (2 at remote sites and one in a main DC) and are seeing
4.4:1 compression. That's with a reasonable mix of data and no client
side compression.
Whilst dedupe isn't superb, but as we know it's generally lower with TSM
anyway, a big
from the Server side using client option sets.
Regards,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
On Jan 12
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Kelly Lipp wrote:
We have a customer that insisted on buying one of these for his TSM
environment. Promised 20:1 dedup. He saw
Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 12/02/2010
On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Kelly Lipp wrote:
We have a customer that insisted on buying one of these for his TSM
environment. Promised
, January 13, 2010 6:14 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DataDomain VTL
Any compressed/ encrypted data will not de-dupe well or if at all.
(Compressed / Encrypted Data have unique signatures every time)
In regards to client side compression, that feature tends to be of value
on a small remote
: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:58 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Is anyone out there using a DataDomain VTL? I'm getting some pressure
to look at this, and I'd like to find some honest opinions of them. I
know that some time back there were some conversations around
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Howard,
I have a pair of DDR410s and pair of DDR510's that are configured for
NFS. The 510's are being used to store vRanger backups of a VM
environment. Compression/deduplication is incredible for this
application. 47TB(terabytes) are stored
.
See Ya'
Howard Coles Jr.
John 3:16!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Strand, Neil B.
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 8:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Howard,
I have a pair of DDR410s
Subject: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Is anyone out there using a DataDomain VTL? I'm getting some pressure
to look at this, and I'd like to find some honest opinions of them. I
know that some time back there were some conversations around this, but
some tech has been updated and DD has been bought by EMC
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
Could you share those reasons? I would be interested because we tested
one,
and the NFS seemed to work great. Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Howard Coles
howard.co...@ardenthealth.com
wrote:
Thanks. I don't want to do the NFS stuff
: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DataDomain VTL
We have a customer that insisted on buying one of these for his TSM
environment. Promised 20:1 dedup. He saw about five to one. He was in
our Level 2 class telling the story. At the end he said he
On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Kelly Lipp wrote:
We have a customer that insisted on buying one of these for his TSM
environment. Promised 20:1 dedup. He saw about five to one. He was in our
Level 2 class telling the story. At the end he said he wouldn't buy it
again. I made him repeat
Is anyone out there using a DataDomain VTL? I'm getting some pressure
to look at this, and I'd like to find some honest opinions of them. I
know that some time back there were some conversations around this, but
some tech has been updated and DD has been bought by EMC, etc. So, if
you have one
24 matches
Mail list logo
