Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours)

2002-03-08 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Whoever told you that is wrong. However, journal-based backup does require a 4.2 server, which would not help Bob because he is running a 3.7 server. For Bob's problem, I find 7+ hours a long time to process 300,000 files, even with traditional incremental backup. However, there could be

Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours)

2002-03-08 Thread Ehland Ann J
with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours) Whoever told you that is wrong. However, journal-based backup does require a 4.2 server, which would not help Bob because he is running a 3.7 server. For Bob's problem, I find 7+ hours a long time to process 300,000 files, even with traditional

Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours)

2002-03-08 Thread Andrew Raibeck
/Tucson/IBM on 03/08/2002 11:19 - Andrew Raibeck 03/08/2002 11:09 To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: From: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Subject:Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours

Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 hours)

2002-03-08 Thread Andrew Raibeck
: Subject:Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes8 hours) I'm sorry, I should have clarified that a little better. Is journal-based backup supported for W2K clustered servers? -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED