, February 13, 2009 7:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Actually 6.1 has not been released yet; it has only been *announced*.
Electronic availability date is March 27, 2009, and media availability
date is April 24, 2009.
Best regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Actually 6.1 has not been released yet; it has only been *announced
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Actually 6.1 has not been released yet; it has only been
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Couple folks just came back from pulse and one of the Labs was the TSM
Upgrade, apparently some Beta testers are seeing a 40GB upgrade DB
taking 28Hrs on avg hdw
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:38:11AM -0500, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
As with anything, YMMV.
The planning guide - current goal for upgrade is 5GB to 10GB/hr
Is there any requirement that the 'source' database be fully audited before
the upgrade? Does the upgrade db catch any 'hidden'
Hello,
Hart, Charles A wrote:
Couple folks just came back from pulse and one of the Labs was the
TSM
Upgrade, apparently some Beta testers are seeing a 40GB upgrade DB
taking 28Hrs on avg hdw
is this is true than this would be a nightmare.
Can anyone comment on that ??
There
Is there any requirement that the 'source' database be fully audited
before
the upgrade? Does the upgrade db catch any 'hidden' problems in the
pre
V6
database, or does it just crash and burn?
I have seen issues with my db upgrade but discovered they were there
before the upgrade. I
_Top_of_Message_
On 13 feb 2009, at 04:02, Remco Post wrote:
be ware that TSM on z/OS has been at about ADSM 3.7 capability level
in most recent releases and that if you required new features IBM
would direct you to zLinux anyway,
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Personal experience with a 80GB database was 33minutes when going from 5.5.1.6
to 6.1 Beta.
JoeA
Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Partners Healthcare Systems
Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager jabb...@partners.org
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
Actually 6.1 has not been released yet; it has only been
, 2009 2:06 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM v6 -announcement
The organization I belong to in IBM was involved in the beta program for
TSM V6. We assisted customers in the installation and training for the new
release. I did the education for the DB Upgrade process, and also assisted
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:25:23 -0600, Hart, Charles A charles_h...@uhc.com
said:
Couple folks just came back from pulse and one of the Labs was the TSM
Upgrade, apparently some Beta testers are seeing a 40GB upgrade DB
taking 28Hrs on avg hdw
Mmm. I don't know if I'm supposed to still
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
On Feb 13, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Tim Brown wrote:
Where can one get information on this offering, is it a web seminar ?
Storage Technical Exchange being given 2/26 (8:00 am PST) on an
overview of TSM V6
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support
I see it at 11 AM Eastern.
See Ya'
Howard
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
Of Tyree, David
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 2:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
They might want
I have read announcement letter 209-004 multiple times and was looking
at the server documentation that was available and there were no mention
of TSM version 6 for z/OS server. There were documentation for z/OS BA
client and API. Is this a subtle hint that TSM version 6 for z/OS
server is not
: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
I have read announcement letter 209-004 multiple times and was looking
at the server documentation that was available and there were no mention
of TSM version 6 for z/OS server. There were documentation for z/OS BA
client and API. Is this a subtle hint that TSM
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
I have read announcement letter 209-004 multiple times and was looking
at the server documentation that was available and there were no
mention
of TSM version 6 for z/OS server. There were documentation for z/OS
BA
Hello,
Remco Post wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 04:02, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
... cut for clarity ...
Also, they will not be supporting Linux NON-x64, which causes me
issues
since 2 of my RH Linux server are not x64 capable and will require
replacing/upgrading/merging with another
18 matches
Mail list logo
