, Andy
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 7:40 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] virtual tape library versus disk
I assume you plan to use a de-duplicating storage device.
8Gb FC tends to be faster than 10Gb Ethernet.
File systems tend to be easier to manage.
VTL option tends to cost
08, 2013 9:06 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] virtual tape library versus disk
Hi Andy,
Yes, we plan to use a de-duplicating storage device for TSM.
Thanks for your responds.
Do you know if the application TSM itself have preference?
Kind Regards,
Ruud Meuleman
-Original
Hi,
Does anybody knows what are the advantages and disadvantages of using virtual
tape library instead of normal disks for TSM storage pools?
Kind Regards,
Ruud Meuleman
**
This transmission is confidential and must
, 2013 10:21 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] virtual tape library versus disk
Hi,
Does anybody knows what are the advantages and disadvantages of using virtual
tape library instead of normal disks for TSM storage pools?
Kind Regards,
Ruud Meuleman
Hi everybody.
What VTL solution do you recommend?Our main backup tool is TSM and we also have
Networker for documentum backup.
I mainly look for IBM,EMC,HP,Netapp.
Thanks in advance
Jorge
Coaching Community, LLC
Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226
Cell: (314) 750-8721
Original Message
Subject: [ADSM-L] Virtual Tape Library
From: Jorge Amil jorgea...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, June 01, 2010 9:57 am
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi everybody.
What VTL solution
Hi,
I currently have at my disposal a NetApp VTL 600 for testing purposes.
Setup :
It's a single shelf VTL containing 14 500GB SATA disks including 1
hotspare.
I have a Windows server attached via FC, TSM 5.4 installed on the
server.
The VTL is configured to be a NetApp library and it's
Hi friends,
Can anyone tell me the concept of Virtual Tape Library in Tivoli Storage
Manager?
I will appreciate if someone can share TSM document with VTL with me.
Best regards,
Sandeep jain
DISCLAIMER “The information contained in this e-mail is
intended only for the person or entity
, June 12, 2006 3:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Quantum DX30 virtual tape library - cartridge sizing
I just had a Quantum DX30 VTL installed last week.
the configured available storage is 5.11 TB.
the installer set the cartridge size to 35 GB. which gave me
136 35 GB dlt carts
Greetings-
We are looking at purchasing an EMC CDL (virtual tape library), and I'm
trying to figure out exactly how much disk I'm going to need to meet my
requirements.
select sum(physical_mb) from occupancy where stgpool_name='tapepool'
Gives me ~62TB. Is that number the compressed value
by: ADSM: Subject: Sizing for a virtual tape
library
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU
09/01/2004 10:04
AM
Please respond
In thinking about my previous reply to you, I thought I should say this . .
. .
My big problem when I first started thinking about a virtual tape library
was in thinking of it as a big disk. It's NOT . . .It is really a tape
library (or several tape libraries) with tape drives and cartridges
(My origional post was rejected . . . I'm resending it)
I've been playing around with the same thing although in a completely
different context.
Although a better person should answer this, I believe the occ is what the
TSM server sees -
the byte stream into and out of the TSM server. If
I agree, think of it as so many tapes. Since they are 'really fast tapes',
being on disk, you might consider doing reclaimation at some unusually low
number to get expired data out of the way ASAP. If you don't need the space
that badly, relax the reclaimation percentage a bit. Instead of
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Coats, Jack
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sizing for a virtual tape library
I agree, think of it as so many tapes. Since they are 'really fast
tapes', being on disk, you might
Message-
From: Johnson, Milton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sizing for a virtual tape library
Just to add another fly in the ointment, if you have an aggressive
reclamation threshold, say 25%, and a reuse delay of say 5
I tried using the IBM 3494-B18 VTS with TSM on the zSeries (z/OS) and
decided it was not a good fit. TSM recalls partially fill tapes to finish
filling it. The recall time was about 4 minutes. Reclaim processing took
forever to bring in reclaimable volumes. Restores took forever with double
Anyone tried using one with TSM?
I am mainly interested in a Windows environment, but other experiences would
be very intersting?
Vendor? Size? Price? Ease of Setup? Ease of Use? Operational
considerations? Opinions?
TIA ... Jack
18 matches
Mail list logo
