Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide

2016-02-04 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
> Maybe it's an "age thing." Yea . . . I resemble that. I find online documentation like the Info Centers to be ok for finding a single piece of information when you mostly know what you are looking for. They are not good for trying to figure out any kind of a broader topic. So I also

Re: amazon storage gateway vtl and tsm

2016-02-04 Thread Paul Zarnowski
I suggest you talk to your IBM rep and ask them about TSM support for amazon S3 storage. IMHO, using a VTL gateway in front of S3 will cause high egress fees (i.e., when you do reclaim processing for the vtl volumes). Storing directly into S3 would be (again, IMHO) more cost-effective.

Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide

2016-02-04 Thread Vandeventer, Harold [OITS]
Excellent! My thoughts exactly re the Information Center. One can find what you already know about (to clarify a detail), but getting the big picture view requires that 1,000 pages and more of the Admin Guide. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide

2016-02-04 Thread Rick Adamson
Well said Roger, I agree wholeheartedly ! -Rick Adamson -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger Deschner Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:28 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's

Re: getting performance from nfs storage over 10 gb link

2016-02-04 Thread Lee, Gary
For Ken: Can you send me the pdf itself? Can't seem to get it to display or download here. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mueller, Ken Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 3:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]

amazon storage gateway vtl and tsm

2016-02-04 Thread Lee, Gary
Ok, we just got the word. The solution for my unsupported ibm 3494 libraries will be an amazon s3 storage gateway vtl. Anyone deployed one of these with tsm? We are running tsm 6.3.4 on RHEL 6.5 servers. I've been reading, and so far, there seem to be severe limits on libraries using there