Ian said the following:
In any case that's probably more trouble than you want to go to.
Presumably
you plan to ship your users a copy of the code. It's hard for you to
make
it impossible for them to use without your consent simply because they
can
easily run your component through
It the component design that I have, it appears that I am going to end up
with something on the order of 300 threads running. My question is simple.
Is this number of threads going to cause me massive headaches?
Okay, before you ask, the reason that I have this design is that I have a
number of
Anakrino does a good job.
I would point you to saurik.com, but it seems to be down at present.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: 30 June 2002 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Let's generalize the problem: What kind of licensing tricks should I apply
in order to make sure that only the customer to whom I sold an app is going
to use it? (I guess making sure this won't happen is far too ambitious ---
but can we at least come up with a protection that is *difficult* to
You are dead :-) Frankly, tell your hardware vendor to stick to hardware
and not to advice people with unusable software designs.
Use around 20-30 threads per processor. Take requests and dispatch them
to a thread pool. Use a work ticket based design, taking a work item,
have a thread handle
http://www.remotesoft.com/
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:59:36 +0800, Ben Kloosterman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another solution is after the DB has been updated - update each cache and
ensure readers of those items are locked until the entire transaction
update has finished. at least that way you see all the transaction or
Thomas, I'm surprised that you can provide such an apparently definitive answer
without knowing more about the environment.
For a start, the hardware vendor is likely supplying software libraries used to
interface with the boards. It may be that the design of these libraries makes a
Let's generalize the problem: What kind of licensing tricks should I
apply
in order to make sure that only the customer to whom I sold an app is
going
to use it? (I guess making sure this won't happen is far too ambitious
---
but can we at least come up with a protection that is *difficult*
The following test case can't be compiled correctly using
System.Reflection.Emit:
using System;
public interface I {
void stuff();
}
struct T : I {
public void stuff () {}
static int Main() {
bool good = false;
foreach (Type iface in
Not sure where to post this, so I will start here. My client has Visual
Source Safe and Rational Clear Case source control on their desktops. I
only have VSS. They recently installed .NET on their machines. I have
asked them to go into VSS from the .NET IDE and copy all of the project
files
Sean, good feedback but not an option on my client site. We want to do all
VSS integration through the .NET IDE.
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
DefaultPrinting: You can print to the default printer without user
interaction and to any printer selected by the user through PrintDialog
SafePrinting: You can only print by presenting the PrintDialog to the
user and using the printer selected by the user
To use the PrintDialog you should be
I have a struct which needs to be marshaled to and from managed code. One
of the struct members is an integer, but it is mangled in a sense: it uses
only 28 bits, and HSB of each byte is zero. To avoid bit arithmetic sprinkled
over .NET code, I decided to hook up a custom marshaler to this field
Adam, if you notice this reads use 'Visual Source Safe' setting's. This
does not change which source control provider you want to use. Ours is
pointed to VSS but still open in Clear Case.
We even went into Clear Case and Stopped it. Same results.
You can read messages from the Advanced
15 matches
Mail list logo
