Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Binary data in the #US heap.

2003-01-17 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 01/15/03 Serge Lidin wrote: One example of using an arbitrary blob is value type initialization. Take a look at the following code: .class public value sequential MyVT { .pack 1 .field public int32 a .field public int64 b .field public int16 c

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Possible Bug in System.Web.Mail.SmtpMail

2003-01-17 Thread Akshay Arora
Hi everyone, I tried to see if anyone has noticed this, but no one on the CX group knew. So, here is what I'm having a problem with. Sending attachments when you have to specify the SmtpMail.SmtpServer... So, my mail sends with no problems with I don't specify SmtpMail.SmtpServer, but when I

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Memory leak in VSA engine

2003-01-17 Thread Dave Adair
We use VSA scripting for user-defined scripts in our app. The problem is that once an assembly is compiled and loaded it is never unloaded. The result is a memory leak. We implemented an appdomain recycling mechanism (i.e. the VSA code is compiled and executed in a new appdomain and then the

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Possible Bug in System.Web.Mail.SmtpMail

2003-01-17 Thread Akshay Arora
Sending attachments when you have to specify the SmtpMail.SmtpServer... I was able to get this working eventually. Somewhere on the web someone suggested to try specifying the Encoding of the file as well (UUEncode), and when I specified, it worked fine. Though I am still somewhat confused as

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Memory leak in VSA engine

2003-01-17 Thread Adam Sills
Are you calling .Close on your IVsaEngine object? We use VSA scripting for user-defined scripts in our app. The problem is that once an assembly is compiled and loaded it is never unloaded. The result is a memory leak. We implemented an appdomain recycling mechanism (i.e. the VSA code is

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Bypass http proxy server for intranet app using remoting

2003-01-17 Thread xiao
Hi, All, I am trying to develop an Intranet application using .NET Remoting using IIS as the host (which limit to http channel). When i try to connect to the server from the client, i get this error 407 Proxy Authentication Required - since the clients are behind a firewall and all http requests

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting: What is everybody doing for simple, robust, secure, efficient IPC?

2003-01-17 Thread Shawn A. Van Ness
It would be a really cool pet project to develop a remoting channel over shared mem... but that's a heck of a lot of code to write. Anyone know if it's been done already? -S On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:16:10 -, Richard Blewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You thought of using shared memory? In

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting Question

2003-01-17 Thread Abdulla, Jehangir
I'm writing a Remote caching application and the requirement is that any object can be stored in the Remote Cache, which is located on another server. I am using Remoting and have a class that has two functions, GetElement and SetElement, both of which take Object. Since any object can be

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Binary data in the #US heap.

2003-01-17 Thread Ted Neward
I don't think Serge was necessarily recommending it as standard practice, just as an example of what it might be used for. Ted Neward { .NET Java } Author, Instructor http://www.neward.net/ted/weblog http://www.javageeks.com http://www.clrgeeks.com - Original Message - From: Paolo

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Remoting: What is everybody doing for simple, robust, secure, efficient IPC?

2003-01-17 Thread Howard Hoffman
Doesn't Named-Pipe transport w/in machine get implemented by Win32 as memory-mapped file (i.e. shared memory)? You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.