> > The 1 after the backtick (`) indicates the # of type
> > parameters for the generic type. For example, given this
> > type definition:
> >
> > class Generic {}
> >
> > you'd use "Generic`2".
>
> I've seen some weird syntaxis in my life (hello APL ;)) but this
> is one of the most weird
It's really not that hard. Version information for assembly references is, to my
knowledge, stored in one place in a given assembly, the AssemblyRef table. This table
contains an index into the blob heap, where the public key token lays. A similar index
exists that points to the hash value.
Yo
Because it's perfectly legal as far as the CLR is concerned. An enum is effectively an
integral primitive that is treated slightly differently by the runtime. Any valid
value for the primitive type is a valid value for the enum.
By not limiting the enum to a set of values, it's possible to suppo
Well, for starters you'll have an eaiser time using MC++ to write the
interop rather than another language(what language are you targetting?).
There is a pretty decent explination of the defrag apis as they were in nt 4
at [1]. 2k and XP have had some enhancements which you should be able to
find b
Sure, anything that makes sense to inline without considering that, really.
Things like property accessors and basic utility methods will be inlined
quite often, if not always. A method that does much more than some rather
basic work probably shouldn't be inlined, it results in larger code and the
y methods.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software & Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Daniel O'Connell
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Oktober 2003 03:02
&
ry : ICollection
> where K : IComparable
> where V : Object
>
>
> BTW, what does the "new()" do?
>
> ^Tum
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
what does the "new()" do?
>
> ^Tum
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel O'Connell
> > Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 11:26 a.m.
> > To
VB.NET doing?
> >
> > Dominic Cooney
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
O'Connell
> > Sent: Thursday, 23 October 2003 9:05 AM
> > To: [EMAI
I'd say readability first, personally. It'd be alot easier to read
public class Dictionary where KeyType : IComparable,
ICollection, IAnotherThing, ValueType : IComparable, IDictionaryValue,
IAnotherRestriction
than
public class Dictionary;
Beyond that, I imagine parsing is easier this way. It w
>> But what's wrong with creating a thread? If you use the
>> threadpool it's almost a one-liner!
>Although if you use the threadpool you almost certainly won't be
>creating a thread - you'll just be using a thread that was already in
>the thread pool most of the time.
>And that's typically a g
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Gaer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:08 PM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Async Data Commands with ADO.Net
> Is anyone familiar with a method to have an ADO.Net command object
> perform a command.ExecuteNonQuery(
12 matches
Mail list logo
