Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs

2007-06-21 Thread Ron Inbar
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:44:55 -0700, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There's no "standard place" to store "plain >old" DLLs such that the operating system or CLR can find the right DLL. Actually, there is at least one such place, as I said in my original post: %windir%\system32 and %w

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs

2007-06-21 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
On 6/21/07, Ron Inbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But there's no logic, except that 32-bit processes should load 32-bit DLLs, and 64-bit processes should load 64-bit DLLs. I don't see any reason why this logic should be in my code and not in the OS or the CLR. If only your code knows where t

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs

2007-06-21 Thread Ron Inbar
;To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM >Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs > >Hi, > >I want to compile my managed assemblies (both DLLs and EXEs) as AnyCPU. >I have a small number of unmanaged DLLs, for some of which I have both a >32-bit version and a

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs

2007-06-21 Thread Nassar, Anthony
NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Inbar Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 3:39 PM To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs Hi, I want to compile my managed assemblies (both DLLs and EXEs) as AnyCPU. I have a small number of unma

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Loading 32/64-bit unmanaged DLLs

2007-06-19 Thread Ron Inbar
Hi, I want to compile my managed assemblies (both DLLs and EXEs) as AnyCPU. I have a small number of unmanaged DLLs, for some of which I have both a 32-bit version and a 64-bit version, and for others I only have a 32-bit version. Obviously, applications that load DLLs of the latter kind must be c