Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code

2003-07-09 Thread Charlie Poole
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TIAGO PASCOAL > (Interaction) > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code > > > Does this include COM references obtained via code like this? : > >

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code

2003-07-09 Thread TIAGO PASCOAL (Interaction)
ire to appear." [Socrates] > -Original Message- > From: Charlie Poole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: quarta-feira, 9 de Julho de 2003 0:44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject fr

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code

2003-07-08 Thread Charlie Poole
11:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code > > > I read a short article on "why not to use ReleaseComObject" method on > the Chris Brume's web log. However, it started by saying that the use of > ReleaseCOM

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] ReleaseCOMObject from Managed code

2003-07-08 Thread Johnny Chung
I read a short article on "why not to use ReleaseComObject" method on the Chris Brume's web log. However, it started by saying that the use of ReleaseCOMObject will release all refcounts at once, then it started explaining the method returns the number of refcounts and how application code should c