Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up parameter

2007-01-05 Thread Georg Jansen
w 1.1 or 2.0 will behave. It's probably worth experimenting >with though. > >Geoff > >> -Original Message- >> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eddie Lascu >> Sent: 0

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up parameter

2007-01-04 Thread Dave
ve. It's probably worth experimenting >with though. > >Geoff > >> -Original Message- >> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eddie Lascu >> Sent: 02 January 2007 12:42 >&g

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up parameter

2007-01-04 Thread Dave Lacerte
ehave. It's probably worth experimenting >with though. > >Geoff > >> -Original Message- >> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eddie Lascu >> Sent: 02 January 2007 12:42

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up parameter

2007-01-02 Thread Geoff Taylor
anuary 2007 12:42 > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up > parameter > > Why don't you rename your cMyConfigFile.config file as a first step of > your > application. The reason why you would need a d

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Configuration file name as a start up parameter

2007-01-02 Thread Eddie Lascu
Why don't you rename your cMyConfigFile.config file as a first step of your application. The reason why you would need a different name (I presume) is to be able to switch from one config file to the other just by restarting your service with a different start-up parameter. You could have cMyConfi