Andreas J Koenig wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:09:07 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Will it not also affect us who build mod_perl applications and want
an easy-to-use installer to just work for people who download our
software? Frankly, I don't think that it should be fine for
Cure wrote:
Everybody needs to STEP BACK and realize how much work and soul Stas
has put into mod_perl.
He deserves A LOT OF CREDIT. Keep up the Good work Stas.
Thanks Cure, for the kind words...
but we are talking about a different kind of credit here. Andreas has
put just as much work and soul
Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stas Unfortunately thanks to Randal, people are now totally confused.
No, I think thanks to me, people are now aware of a problem of
fundamental incompatibility between the single @INC historical
legacy of the entire Perl world and toolchain, and
- Original Message -
From: Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com
To: Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: advocacy@perl.apache.org; Andreas J Koenig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; mod_perl Mailing List
modperl@perl.apache.org; Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:09
Everybody needs to STEP BACK and realize how much work and soul Stas
has put into mod_perl.
He deserves A LOT OF CREDIT. Keep up the Good work Stas.
Paul
Stas Bekman wrote:
Andreas J Koenig wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:09:07 -0500, Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Will it not also
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:54:27 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Cure wrote:
Everybody needs to STEP BACK and realize how much work and soul
Stas has put into mod_perl.
He deserves A LOT OF CREDIT. Keep up the Good work Stas.
Actually, I love Stas. And I'm sure he knows that.
I might have misunderstood , Sorry. I just love mod_perl so much :)
Paul
Andreas J Koenig wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:54:27 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Cure wrote:
