Re: reply-to header test

2004-08-06 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stas coolio, it works ;) thanks apmail folks. Ugh. No. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Please remove this abomination. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: reply-to header test

2004-08-06 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stas Sorry, Randal, but No to your No. I spend a way too much time asking Stas people to reply to the list. And I predict within four weeks, someone will post a mailing here that says oops, I didn't mean that for the list. It happens. Best to err

Re: reply-to header test

2004-08-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stas Sorry, Randal, but No to your No. I spend a way too much time asking Stas people to reply to the list. And I predict within four weeks, someone will post a mailing here that says oops, I didn't mean that for the list. It