Re: slashdot php article

2004-12-22 Thread Stas Bekman
allan juul wrote: Perrin Harkins wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 07:56 +0100, allan juul wrote: it would be cool if it somehow somehwhere were more visible for everybody. for instance, if ASF on the menu on http://apache.org/ had a big fat checked mark and the words Apache2 compatible next to

Re: slashdot php article

2004-12-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 21:04 +0100, allan juul wrote: aha - hmm, if that's the case why aren't *we* worried about people upgrading to Apache2 like the PHP folks apparently are, as seen in the slashdot article ? IOW, whats the big difference in the mod_perl community making an upgrade

Re: slashdot php article

2004-12-21 Thread Stas Bekman
also, i don't know if this true, but i like the idea of mod_perl being an Apache module more than a perl module. And i like the idea of mod_perl versions following Apache versions. So when Apache releases Apache 3.0 [which surely will be a major release], mod_perl3 will follow in the