Re: Sun pkg of Perl versus the ActiveState port

2002-08-27 Thread Steven Lembark
-- _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > tell your outsourced sysadmins that they work for you, not you for them. Better yet, tell your management. If they get the feeling that having a reasonable version of Perl on the box will help it can do wonders for getting it there. -- Steven Lembark

Re: Sun pkg of Perl versus the ActiveState port

2002-08-26 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a minor problem, which someone on the list can probably help me > on. Our outsourced sysadmins are holding out for a pkgadd version of Perl to > install on our Sun/Solaris servers, on the grounds that such a package is > of

Re: Sun pkg of Perl versus the ActiveState port

2002-08-26 Thread lembark
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/26/02 10:50:34 -0400 > Hi, folks, > > We are in the home stretch of getting Perl on the "okay to use" list > here. > > I have a minor problem, which someone on the list can probably help me > on. Our outsourced sysadmins are holding out for a pkgadd versio

Sun pkg of Perl versus the ActiveState port

2002-08-26 Thread jadams01
Hi, folks, We are in the home stretch of getting Perl on the "okay to use" list here. I have a minor problem, which someone on the list can probably help me on. Our outsourced sysadmins are holding out for a pkgadd version of Perl to install on our Sun/Solaris servers, on the grounds t