Re: Geotargets list contains duplicate records.

Hi Carmela, Thanks for the reply. To give you a more specific example. Compare rows 25057 and 74669 of the geotargets csv (to save you time check the attached image) The rows are identical except the criteria ID So the question is what's the difference between these two entries? If wish to

Re: API Quota Reduction

Hello, Bringing this conversation back to life I can see that moving from v10 https://developers.google.com/google-ads/api/reference/rpc/v10/GenerateKeywordHistoricalMetricsRequest to v11 https://developers.google.com/google-ads/api/reference/rpc/v11/GenerateKeywordHistoricalMetricsRequest a

Re: Keyword Ideas grouped view

+ 1 for this feature! thanks On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 11:25:44 AM UTC+2 digorb...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Jinky, > > Thank you for sharing plans for this feature. Looking forward to be using > it in future :) > > Respectfully, > Dmytro > > вівторок, 15 березня 2022 р. о 16:10:03 UTC+2

Re: Question about API limits and quotas based on specific example

yone could execute an infinite number of keyword plan related operations, which I think isn't the case, with basic access at least. I hope the clarification to my question makes sense. Thank you, Alex Papageorgiou On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 8:17 AM Google Ads API Forum Advisor wrote: > Hello Alex,

Question about API limits and quotas based on specific example

://developers.google.com/google-ads/api/docs/best-practices/quotas ? Or are they counted as regular operations ie 4 out of the 15,000 available? Thanks, Alex Papageorgiou -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com

Search volumes when close variants are grouped together

Hi, A question regarding the consistency in the way similar terms are grouped together when search volumes are requested. Is the way these groups are created consistent in time or subject to change? For example say that I request the volume for keywords a,b,c but the response groups

Re: access annotation data (refine) with keyword ideas service

https://groups.google.com/g/adwords-api/c/5dm14McTfDE/m/p3B1Ow1UCgAJ The thread is from 2019 - Has anything changed with respect to this behaviour in the meanwhile? Thank you. On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 10:57 PM Google Ads API Forum Advisor wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I work with Mark and will assist

Re: access annotation data (refine) with keyword ideas service

Hi Aryeh I hope the answer will be helpful to others. One question that remains is about the difference between the keyword suggestion metrics provided via the API and those available via the UI. I understand thanks to previous conversations here that this is expected behaviour since the

Re: access annotation data (refine) with keyword ideas service

L97>, the following two lines within the main function: keyword_annotation = client.enums.KeywordPlanKeywordAnnotationEnum request.keyword_annotation = keyword_annotation The response will include the associated concepts for each keyword. Alex Papageorgiou On Tuesday, July 27, 2021 a

access annotation data (refine) with keyword ideas service

ailable through the UI are there, but not the annotations. Can you provide some guidance about how to access it? Thank you Alex Papageorgiou -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You

Keyword volumes - aggregates?

Hi, A question re the search volumes returned via the generate_keyword_ideas function. Are these volumes aggregates of multiple similar keywords grouped together? If so is there a way to know when this is the case, and which are these extra keywords in each case? Thanks, Alex Papageorgiou

Re: Can I set a date range when using Generate Historical Metrics of the Keyword Plan service?

Hi Xiaoming, Following up on this. Is there a plan to add this feature in the near future? Any updates? Thank you. On Friday, August 7, 2020 at 7:24:38 PM UTC+3 adsapiforumadvisor wrote: > Hi Fred, > > Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately, it is currently not supported > to generate