Guys,
I have some Cambium 450 Gear that we are selling...new old stock been sitting
here for a while) and some used. Open to certain trades also. Not appropriate
to list here, but if you are interested, please email me directly.
Paul
Paul McCall, President
Florida Broadband / PDMNet
658 Old
If they actually have SIP devices, SIP is probably turned off as it breaks
many features people want like BLF. This does not hold true for premise
based systems.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:04 AM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> A little bit of discussion going on Mikrotik forum. One guy says exploit
>
A little bit of discussion going on Mikrotik forum. One guy says exploit
didn't work with Mikrotik SIP ALG enabled, but I wouldn't take that to the
bank, he doesn't give any details of what he tried.
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2=168372
-Original Message-
From: AF On
I read a little deeper just now. I was wondering how he avoided having
the browser toss errors or ask permission to run the javascript, or what
not. Apparently the javascript figures out the MTU and maximum segment
size, then sends an HTTP post with data large enough to be fragmented.
The
Once it executes things on the host, it can reopen and repeat the process if
that were the case.
[ https://www.wavedirect.net/ |]
[ https://www.facebook.com/ruralhighspeed ] [
https://www.instagram.com/wave.direct/ ] [
https://www.linkedin.com/company/wavedirect-telecommunication/ ] [
I believe in the SIP world the advice is always turn off the SIP ALG. But on
customer managed routers, the customer is never going to change it from the
default, they don't even update the firmware.
-Original Message-
From: AF On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020
Wouldn’t there be a short window of opportunity like 5 or 10 minutes before the
TCP connection ages out in the NAT connections table? Or does this also rely
on a flaw in some ALG?
I worry more about UPnP which can program permanent port forwards in the
router. There are even flawed
It seems to exploit behavior of the application layer gateway. That
allows stuff like RTP and FTP which use dynamic ports to operate through
NAT. The script tricks the gateway into forwarding an arbitrary port
number to the target device. Presumably you then attack a vulnerable
service on the
I wondered when someone would exploit this. I knew the possibility existed
because most firewalls and nat base their packet forwarding on the origin. If
it is a new connection and it wasn't established internally it drops it. So
when we establish a connection outside we open an arbitrary source
