Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Steve Jones
It's not possible, corporations are there to look out for consumers. That's why this infrastructure spending needs only to go to the big outfits who look out for us. Look at Cuba, frontier is not in Cuba, and look what happenned there. On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, 6:01 PM Jan-GAMs wrote: > You must

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Jan-GAMs
You must not be from around here.  their reputation got so bad they changed their name On 7/14/21 12:23 PM, Steve Jones wrote: frontier does not play fast and loose. They follow all of the rules and are completely on the up an up. When I think of an upstanding company, I think of Frontier

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Chuck McCown via AF
Maybe 22 LR HV so you can get some distance from the target. From: Chuck McCown via AF Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 1:32 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Cc: Chuck McCown Subject: Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact .22 long rifle From: Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Sean Heskett
Thanks for all your responses guys. Really frustrating that the “big guys” would just ignore the rules. Might have to use chuck’s solution lol On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:08 PM Tyson Burris wrote: > No contact information but I would say Mark is correct. > The only reason I concluded this as

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Bill Prince
Steve is being the anti-Steve. bp On 7/14/2021 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: Is today backwards day?   From: Steve Jones Sent:

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Chuck McCown via AF
Is today backwards day? From: Steve Jones Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 1:23 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact frontier does not play fast and loose. They follow all of the rules and are completely on the up an up. When I think of an upstanding

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Chuck McCown via AF
.22 long rifle From: Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 12:39 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer? Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we believe is

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Steve Jones
frontier does not play fast and loose. They follow all of the rules and are completely on the up an up. When I think of an upstanding company, I think of Frontier On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:52 PM Mark Radabaugh wrote: > I can’t prove it yet, but I’m pretty sure there a number of mobile and >

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Tyson Burris
No contact information but I would say Mark is correct. The only reason I concluded this as well is we saw some issues on a Crown tower on one of our sectors. Of all the sites we operate it was only this one and we knew a brand new T-Mobile box was just put in. That new T-Mobile colocation was

Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Mark Radabaugh
I can’t prove it yet, but I’m pretty sure there a number of mobile and iLEC’s running CBRS gear illegally. Frontier has been playing pretty fast and loose with the rules around here. Mark > On Jul 14, 2021, at 2:39 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > Does anyone know how to get in touch with a

[AFMUG] T-Mobile RF contact

2021-07-14 Thread Sean Heskett
Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer? Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we believe is a new T-Mobile site at an American tower facility. The equipment isn’t registered with the SAS and appears to be operating in the part 90 portion of

Re: [AFMUG] Public broadband failures

2021-07-14 Thread Chuck McCown via AF
ACAM and all ILEC support mechanisms have been formulated over many administrations. Actually the current one had not touched it as far as I know. From: Steve Jones Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 5:15 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Public broadband failures