Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 9:27:32 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Peering vs transit
Here is some data for the people that talk about just getting fat transit pipes
and skip peering.
This is from Google's point of view of our network. Yesterday we moved our
google traff
This is where I got started both with the BGP request and PNI request.
https://isp.google.com/iwantpeering
source of that link. https://www.peeringdb.com/net/433
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:30 AM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I'm at ~500 mbps of Google traffic and the website specifically tells me I
>
I'm at ~500 mbps of Google traffic and the website specifically tells me I
have sufficient traffic. I put in a ticket and I guess we'll see what
happens!
Did isp.google.com tell you that you were too big?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:12 AM Zach Underwood
wrote:
> That is the part that we tried
That is the part that we tried for a long time. We shared two IXs with
google, and we asked google for BGP sessions over both IXs and was told
over and over that we were too big for IX. That left us with only two
options, all google over transit links or pay for cross connects between us
and
>From what I'm seeing at isp.google.com to peer you just give them a BGP
peer session. Is that it?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:29 AM Zach Underwood
wrote:
> Here is some data for the people that talk about just getting fat
> transit pipes and skip peering.
>
> This is from Google's point of
Here is some data for the people that talk about just getting fat
transit pipes and skip peering.
This is from Google's point of view of our network. Yesterday we moved our
google traffic from transit (GTT) to PNI.
Goodput up 20%.
retransmit rates dropped in half
Application RTT dropped in half.
