1) Up to 1 Gbps or more, if you have the budget for a large o3b earth
station.
2) o3b is around 150ms, absolute lowest you'll see for geostationary 1:1
SCPC is about 492ms
3) Totally depends on how it's engineered for fade margin.
4) Depends on money, again.
Your questions are sort of like
Testing around the area most are locked at 1Gbps.
Some are 10Gbps connection, but seem throttled at around 1.5Gbps, or something
is causing limitations for that.
The best I’ve found so far routing outside of my own network is this one which
is close to me route wise it appears
A detailed
This is what I get from my home computer to my speedtest.net server using the
Windows 10 Ookla app on my desktop.
A detailed image for this result can be found here:
https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/d/fa07eaa5-e7a9-4bde-9a5a-275836ced15b
Test Date: Aug 03, 2018 20:06
Download: 4672.63 Mbps
Consumer-grade services, like speedtest.net.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Trey Scarborough"
To: af@af.afmug.com
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 6:49:43 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
what type of speedtest server?
On 8/3/2018 2:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Any 10G-level tests. If all you have is your own 10G tests to your own
10G servers, that'll work.
I remember you had problems getting full throughput once you went
MPLS, but some were getting 9G+ out of theirs.
Easy to install RJ45 connectors, plated in rare 50 micron GOLD, most
connectors are only plated with 3 micron of gold.
Rated for CAT5E but CAT6 seems to fit and work well. Thousands deployed in
the field over the last 12 months prior to offering these for sale. Fits
tough cable carrier.
Pics;
Any 10G-level tests. If all you have is your own 10G tests to your own 10G
servers, that'll work.
I remember you had problems getting full throughput once you went MPLS, but
some were getting 9G+ out of theirs.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet
Not sure what you are asking.
Are you wanting us to test to your server?
Or you want to know which of us has speedtest.net on 10G connection?
Or just results of some of us testing to our own 10G servers?
From: AF On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 8:24 PM
To:
TDMA is a good point. If the subscriber radio has to send a bandwidth
request and await a reply with an assigned slot in the next frame before it
can send actual data, it would add an extra ~240 ms.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:05 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Subscriber uplink is likely using some
Subscriber uplink is likely using some sort of TDMA - those protocols are
very difficult to keep efficient when you have hundreds of users in a
channel, weather considerations, priority classes and 240ms latency from
all clients to the headend. Adding 20-200ms for that is probably
reasonable. Also
FOR SALE:
IF interested in any of the items listed below, please let me know. Make an
offer, no reasonable offer will be refused. Shipping will be paid by buyer’s.
I do have more things and will add them as I get the counts.
Brand NEW never put on a customers house, only removed from box and
I think it's mostly congestion. They have a lot of subs going through
each bird.
bp
On 8/3/2018 9:22 AM, Robert Andrews wrote:
Have to include some ms for cache search on the bird... But not 240
ms, I would think...
On 08/03/2018 08:28 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Less 22,400 x 2
Have to include some ms for cache search on the bird... But not 240 ms,
I would think...
On 08/03/2018 08:28 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Less 22,400 x 2 /186000= 240 mS one way.
So 480 mS ping RT under perfect conditions.
But in real life it is twice that. No idea why. Perhaps they are
total ickyness :)
make me feel sticky LOL
On 08/03/2018 10:28 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Less 22,400 x 2 /186000= 240 mS one way.
So 480 mS ping RT under perfect conditions.
But in real life it is twice that. No idea why. Perhaps they are
using another satellite connection for backbone
Less 22,400 x 2 /186000= 240 mS one way.
So 480 mS ping RT under perfect conditions.
But in real life it is twice that. No idea why. Perhaps they are using
another satellite connection for backbone feed.
From: castarritt
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 9:22 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
It is the ~23,000mi orbit geostationary birds that kill latency. When a
ping to a terrestrial server has to travel >90,000mi, the latency will
never be better than half a second. Musk wants to do a large constellation
of low orbit birds.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:18 AM Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
186,000 miles per second. It's not just a good idea, it's the law. :D
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 8/3/18 8:03 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
>> Latency still sucks. 700-800 ms if there is no congestion. Multi-second
>> latency if there is congestion.
>>
>>
>
> Time for
On 8/3/18 8:03 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Latency still sucks. 700-800 ms if there is no congestion. Multi-second
latency if there is congestion.
Time for some quantum entanglement.
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
These days speeds are OK if you are not being throttled for too
much data. I've seen ~~ 20 Mbps download and maybe 3-4 Mbps
upload.
Latency still sucks. 700-800 ms if there is no congestion.
Multi-second latency if there is congestion.
Depends on where you are
suck
suck
suck
suck
They have gotten better with speeds. You get whatever you can afford for the
most part.
Latency is horrible. 800 mS is what it was the last time I played with one.
I did not notice weather or sun outages. But I used it for telemetry, I was
not streaming netflix on it.
I was going to recommend this same tester.
What is cool about it is that you can fully charge a battery, then set this
up to the proper discharge rate, and terminal voltage (from the battery
datasheet), and let it run. It will automatically terminate at the
correct discharge voltage and tell
They weren't any worse than the CB3/Rootenna combo...
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Mitch Koep wrote:
> LOL thanks Chuck
>
> went that route in 2006 and learned an expensive lesson so no thanks
>
> Thought I would just check we have 11 more sites to change over yet
>
> Mitch
>
>
>
> On
22 matches
Mail list logo
