Re: [AFMUG] Propane Tank Remote Level Monitoring

2019-01-23 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Holy cow, it looks like I should get around to finishing up the $59+sensor ($50ish) add-on module for the sitemonitor system Didn't realize these were so expensive. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:48 PM Sean Heskett wrote: > This is what you are looking for. We have 4 of them and love them. > >

Re: [AFMUG] Propane Tank Remote Level Monitoring

2019-01-23 Thread Sean Heskett
This is what you are looking for. We have 4 of them and love them. Generac 7005 Propane Tank (LP) Fuel Level Monitor - WiFi enabled https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072KJBLV2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_cqtsCbZ22K84X The only down side is it has to connect to a 2.4ghz SSID with no security enabled. So we

Re: [AFMUG] Propane Tank Remote Level Monitoring

2019-01-23 Thread Tim Withrow via AF
Most of the propane company's offer remote monitoring. On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 Jesse DuPont wrote: What solutions exist to monitor propane tank levels remotely? I've got an off-grid site with three 100 gallon tanks. The propane guy setup the manifold such that the tanks should drain

[AFMUG] Propane Tank Remote Level Monitoring

2019-01-23 Thread Jesse DuPont
What solutions exist to monitor propane tank levels remotely? I've got an off-grid site with three 100 gallon tanks. The propane guy setup the manifold such that the tanks should drain sequentially, but I'd like to monitoring/chart them remotely. Each tank has a R3D

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Jaime Solorza
Agree with Ken and Dave...check electric houses On Tue, Jan 22, 2019, 10:00 AM Ken Hohhof If you have an electrical supply store nearby, they should carry 3" (trade > size) IMC or rigid conduit. IMC will be considerably lighter and actually > stiffer than rigid. > > -Original Message- >

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Steve Jones
I always thought something like that too til sitepro sent that to us. that was like winning the lottery finding that out. could be that sitepro buys bulk water pipe, cuts to length then coats the whole thing inside and out. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:25 PM Ken Hohhof via AF wrote: > One other

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Chuck McCown
I am guessing you are asking about the mini PC. I don't want it sticking out of the back and it came with the short HDMI cable. -Original Message- From: Robert via AF Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 6:55 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: Robert Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pipe What was the

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Robert via AF
What was the reason for not plugging it directly into the monitor? On 1/23/19 5:19 PM, Ken Hohhof via AF wrote: One other thing, I don’t think water pipe is galvanized on the inside. Rigid conduit or IMC may be, but it looks like a coating other than zinc is also allowed on the inside.

Re: [AFMUG] I did it

2019-01-23 Thread chuck
It is an Azulle Access3. -Original Message- From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 5:39 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Subject: I did it This is the mini computer I selected for my splicing trailer. Boots to the login screen in about 15 seconds, fully logged in and ready to

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread chuck
I am running a field trial right now on cold galv spray paint, plasma arc spray, regular paint and galv stick for repair of hot dipped galv parts. So far the cold galv spray paint is actually seeming to be OK. I know chain link fence people use it for the welds on the gates they make. I have

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Jeremy
That is exactly what I do, I spray cold galvanizing on the ends. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:14 PM Ken Hohhof wrote: > I could be wrong, but I think one of the differences when you buy antenna > mounting pipes from a microwave equipment distributor, is that the pipe is > hot dip galvanized after

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Ken Hohhof
I could be wrong, but I think one of the differences when you buy antenna mounting pipes from a microwave equipment distributor, is that the pipe is hot dip galvanized after being cut to length, so that the ends don’t have exposed steel. Honestly, I’ve never seen a problem with pipe or

Re: [AFMUG] Pipe

2019-01-23 Thread Steve Jones
we get our pipe from the local plumbing shop. site pro accidentally forgot to acetone wash the pipe one time, when we got the part number off of it, it turned out its just galvanized water pipe. 3 inch will be roughly 3.5 OD On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:55 AM Craig Schmaderer wrote: > My go to

Re: [AFMUG] OT - "genius plan" to fund wall with porn tax

2019-01-23 Thread Ron M.
Hmm... if the opposite of "pro" is "con", then the opposite of progress? ;-) On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:18 AM Robert wrote: > Don Quixote = Congress! > > On 1/23/19 7:32 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > Don Quixote for Congress! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: AF On Behalf Of Robert > >

Re: [AFMUG] OT - "genius plan" to fund wall with porn tax

2019-01-23 Thread dave
I vote Bugs bunny. On 1/23/19 10:17 AM, Robert wrote: Don Quixote = Congress! On 1/23/19 7:32 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Don Quixote for Congress! -Original Message- From: AF On Behalf Of Robert Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:09 AM To: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT -

Re: [AFMUG] OT - "genius plan" to fund wall with porn tax

2019-01-23 Thread Bill Prince
Don't get me started... -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:09 AM Robert wrote: > Never ever stopped legislators before... > > On 1/23/19 6:28 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > It's one of those things where you can see the kernel of genius as long > > as you ignore the fact

Re: [AFMUG] OT - "genius plan" to fund wall with porn tax

2019-01-23 Thread Robert
Never ever stopped legislators before... On 1/23/19 6:28 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: It's one of those things where you can see the kernel of genius as long as you ignore the fact that the implementation isn't possible. On 1/22/2019 12:11 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] OT - "genius plan" to fund wall with porn tax

2019-01-23 Thread Adam Moffett
It's one of those things where you can see the kernel of genius as long as you ignore the fact that the implementation isn't possible. On 1/22/2019 12:11 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: