Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

.com>> wrote: AirFiber 4.9GHz radio On Aug 25, 2017 9:42 AM, <s...@genias.net<mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote: AF-4X ? Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] Im Auftrag von Dave Gesendet: Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 An: af@afmug.com&l

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

he Cambium stuff does. Either >>>> Force 200 or 450i covers 4.9 through 5. Handy. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:54 AM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> AirFiber 4.9GHz radio >>>>&g

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

Im Auftrag von Dave Gesendet: Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 An: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 connectorized and use your own antennas. use force 180's for the clients. On 08/23/2017 07:15 AM, Lewis Bergma

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

rFiber 4.9GHz radio >>>> >>>> On Aug 25, 2017 9:42 AM, <s...@genias.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> AF-4X ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mai

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

cwifi.com> >> wrote: >> >> AirFiber 4.9GHz radio >>> >>> On Aug 25, 2017 9:42 AM, <s...@genias.net> wrote: >>> >>>> AF-4X ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [ma

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

fmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Dave *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 *An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 con

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

ote: >> >>> AF-4X ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Dave >>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 >>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alt

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

This is correct. ePMP is not certified for 4.9 GHz operation in the US. Matt From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 11:37 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative I asked if ePMP could do 4.9 for some public safety

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Dave *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 *An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 connectorized and use your own antennas.

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

gt; wrote: > >> AF-4X ? >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Dave >> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 >> *An:* af@afmug.com >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative >> >> >> >

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

AirFiber 4.9GHz radio On Aug 25, 2017 9:42 AM, <s...@genias.net> wrote: > AF-4X ? > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Dave > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alt

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

AF-4X ? Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Dave Gesendet: Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 connectorized and use your own antennas. use force 180's for the clients

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 connectorized and use your own antennas. use force 180's for the clients. On 08/23/2017 07:15 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote: I am putting up a link for a library and I originally quoted the 450i about a year ago. This link goes to a Sheriff's department so

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

Cambium also just released the 450b SM so there is now a lower cost SM that works in the 4.9ghz band. -Sean On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:56 AM George Skorup wrote: > What Sean said about the water/case seal problem, limited issue. > > If you want 4.9-5.9 capability,

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

The new 670 has Point to a Few Points and it woks in that band. Prolly looking at 3x the cost though. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > On Aug 23, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > 450i

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

What Sean said about the water/case seal problem, limited issue. If you want 4.9-5.9 capability, PxP450i or PTP650. 450i is obviously going to be cheaper. If you're not going to use the integrated panel version of one of those, then make sure the antennas you choose actually work down in the

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

nice thing about 450i vs AF4X is the 450i can do 4.9ghz, 5.2, 5.3,5.4, 5.8ghz where as the AF4X is limited to only 4.9Ghz. You may need the extra channels for some un-forseen reason down the road. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: > 450i is a solid product

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

450i is a solid product and the water intrusion was a limited bad batch. we installed a 4.9Ghz system for our city and it's been a great solution for them (and kept the city out of the unlicensed bands) -sean On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > I

Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative

AF4X would work well. Likely cheaper too. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 active, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> Date: 8/23/17 7:15 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] 450i or alter

[AFMUG] 450i or alternative

I am putting up a link for a library and I originally quoted the 450i about a year ago. This link goes to a Sheriff's department so could use 4.9G so I would like the product to at least be capable of that band. GPS sync would be nice as they have plans for another link in the future. 1. Is