Good info, thanks. I suppose I've heard some of that. I didn't know
anything about the exclusive/reserved licensing option, however.
On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:
So here's what we've been advocating for a while.
-Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed)
-Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee)
-Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply
for PALs at a decent
Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
So here's what we've been advocating for a while.
-Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like
unlicensed)
-Make it so no one company can buy
Seriously, how do you not know what's been going on in 3550 for the last few
years?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, March 28,
Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements?
Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around
here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not
good news if it actually soon will.
On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/96rxvh3wq1e90db/2014-06-13%2013.30%203550-3700%20MHz_%20The%20FCC_s%20Proposal.wmv?dl=0
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com
To: af@afmug.com
No, that’s not what incumbent means in this case. It means federal radar and
grandfathered satellite earth stations. Same thing as when you are currently
registering a 3650 location, if it falls within a protected area around an
earth station, you need their permission.
Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list...
I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very
good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will
incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent
Access, Priority Access and
Got it, thanks.
On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
No, that’s not what incumbent means in this case. It means federal
radar and grandfathered satellite earth stations. Same thing as when you
are currently registering a 3650 location, if it falls within a
Maybe not. Typically FCC and auction doesn't fall within my budget though.
I was hoping they would just extend the 3650 rules to cover more spectrum.
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
May not be as bad as you’re thinking.
*From:* Jason McKemie
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html
Jaime Solorza
Was running SA earlier today with a wideband antenna 800-2700 mhz at site.
.nothing absolutely nothing from 971 to 1320Mhz. .. nothing from 2245 to
2350..then lots from there to 2700...I will try this again from a higher
location. Just curious
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 27, 2015 10:51 PM, Ken Hohhof
Was running SA earlier today with a wideband antenna 800-2700 mhz at site.
.nothing absolutely nothing from 971 to 1320Mhz. .. nothing from 2245 to
2350..then lots from there to 2700...I will try this again from a higher
location. Just curious
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 27, 2015 10:51 PM, Ken Hohhof
The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad.
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html
Jaime Solorza
May not be as bad as you’re thinking.
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz
spectrum | PCWorld
The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad.
On
15 matches
Mail list logo
