Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

hahhahh. - Original Message - From: Eric Muehleisen To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility try slow.com On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote: Ah yes

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

19, 2016 9:12:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility [image: Inline image 1] ^ from office below is from home.. [image: Inline image 2] Maybe the speedtest just isn't setup to scale well yet? On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I fi

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

- Original Message - From: "Daniel White" <afmu...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 8:55:21 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility What I find interesting is my results are different than everyone else. Of course Xfinity/Comcast certainly ha

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

– Hardware Distribution Sales ConVergence Technologies Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <mailto:dwh...@converge-tech.com> dwh...@converge-tech.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:51 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com u

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:42 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> Subject: RE: [AFMUG] fast.com utility On my Comcast connection its within a few Mbps. 100Mbps on Fast.com and 105Mbps on Speedtest. Need to try my WISP connection later today. Daniel White Managing Di

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

o:afmu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:42 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> Subject: RE: [AFMUG] fast.com utility On my Comcast connection its within a few Mbps. 100Mbps on Fast.com and 105Mbps on Speedtest. Need to try my WISP connection later today. Daniel Whi

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

t; dwh...@converge-tech.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility Judging from the last 5 posts, no one has yet... if his test server is inhouse as i think he said - i

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:46 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility > > > > Your v4 goes to Chicago. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Comp

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Ah yes, very interesting. I AM aware CDN is different than website guys, thanks ☺ Just too lazy to trace/torch a CDN address right now. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:46 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

be an > interesting response > > - Original Message - > From: Nate Burke > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:52 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility > > So then do you get full line speed results from the test? > >> On 5/18/2016 5:51

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

ay 18, 2016 5:49:03 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility 2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4 and 205.251.244.235 are both Amazon IPs. Netflix uses a lot of EC2 stuff, so you’re not necessarily hitting their “cache” when you pull up their website. On May 18, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Sterling

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

esday, May 18, 2016 4:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility further discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11722775 This could be useful from a residential last mile customer point of view, to expose ISPs which have good peering/low congestion to speedtes

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Judging from the last 5 posts, no one has yet... if his test server is inhouse as i think he said - i agree, should be an interesting response - Original Message - From: Nate Burke To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Yes, and I assume their actual CDNs are closer than that. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Cassidy B. Larson Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:49 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility 2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4 and 205.251.244.235 are both Amazon IPs. Netflix

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

Interesting though, from watching tcpdump while doing a speedtest, I’m seeing it hit BOTH of our local on-net Netflix appliances (over IPv6). > On May 18, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: > > 2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4 and 205.251.244.235 are both Amazon IPs. >

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

not good... - Original Message - From: Sterling Jacobson To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility Very inaccurate too. I get 160Mbps results on a 10Gbps connection. This is with a path to Netflix

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

So then do you get full line speed results from the test? On 5/18/2016 5:51 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: Interesting though, from watching tcpdump while doing a speedtest, I’m seeing it hit BOTH of our local on-net Netflix appliances (over IPv6). On May 18, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Cassidy B.

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4 and 205.251.244.235 are both Amazon IPs. Netflix uses a lot of EC2 stuff, so you’re not necessarily hitting their “cache” when you pull up their website. > On May 18, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: > > Very inaccurate too. > > I get

Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility

oun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility further discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11722775 This could be useful from a residential last mile customer point of view, to expose I

[AFMUG] fast.com utility

Just came across this https://fast.com. Utility from netflix. Torching it looks like it opens 3 HTTPS connections to 3 different IP Addresses to run the test. Only reports download speed, no Latency or Upload.