I am not 100% sure on this, but I have only been loading XM firmware with
NSM, Rockets and NanoBridges. For anything newer, like the NanoBeams we
have been using the XW firmware.
I have seen pretty decent improvements on throughput in some of my rocket
APs since we did these software upgrades. I
No. Different architecture.
Think compiled for Arm vs x86 Windows.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 4, 2015 11:05 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought the XM versus XW was just a hardware thing. Is it
And I’m not seeing the problem where I have XW clients talking to XM Rockets.
Now that I think about it, I had the Powerbeam as the station and the
PowerBridge as the AP. Dang, should have flipped that and retested. The thing
that caught me off guard is that this has been working for several
not mine...I haven't done any Canopy installs in over 5 years...
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Tighten that jpole, put some umph into it!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
?and a bunch of self taps!!! and baling wire!
From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 9:08 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New Satellite Canopy radio
Tighten that jpole, put
That's what I thought. The way some people were talking about it, it
sounded like I misunderstood.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 8:08 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
Yeah XM devices need XM firmware, XW devices need XW. Different hardware.
-Ty
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Josh
What sort of problems were you seeing with WDS on Nanobeams? Was it
Nanobeams on both ends? I know you've posted about it before, but I don't
remember what exactly the issue was.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
I've found that Nanobeams have
Going to install our first NanoBeam to NanoBeam link on Friday at seven
mileslets see how well they work. on bench they did great.
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
wrote:
I know that was some
Quite not the case. Ever price typical LTE? And our licenses you own once
first bought, with no annual renewals.
Thought there was an annual license fee to get firmware updates etc?
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of TJ Trout
Sent:
On list could be educational for the rest of us.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 9:08 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
Who's you guys? I didn't work here when these decisions were made. :)
Some day maybe you can fill me in on what's been done wrong.
I should have been more clear on that one. We don't have any new rockets
deployed.
Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
New
Only issue I have had with the new hardware is three cases now of Nanobeam
M2s connected to RocketM2 APs. Once was too hot and performed like crap
even when intentionally mis-aligned to reduce signal. The other two were
both connected to a sector and when I switched the sector from 10mhz
channel
Always listen to the manufacturer. I don't anyone has ever come up with a
case where their figure was noticeably off. Certainly never not on the
side of caution.
Are you using their full tx power or the tx power of the highest modulation?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
I thought the XM versus XW was just a hardware thing. Is it possible to
update a device that is on XM with XW?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 8:03 AM, Vince West wrote:
I am not 100% sure on this, but I have only been loading XM firmware
with NSM, Rockets and NanoBridges. For
Hello Smart Dudes on the list:
Running a 3.348 mile path for 18 Ghz Dragonwave link to compare what
someone else came up with.I am wondering if they used just unfaded free
space loss calculation and coming up with a figure 10dB better than mine,
I am using unfaded urban area free space loss
I noticed that, good thing you caught it =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Hardy, Tim tha...@comsearch.com wrote:
(+/- 2.0 db)!
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Hardy,
Hum...I have always used it this way and have good results. I know from
experience that funny things happen above 10GHz...guess all this new
fangled stuff is showing my age.
but I still hold that monopole moves just enough to affect stability of
link. That's my story and I am sticking to it..
Patrick, please recheck with nick on that.. AFAIK MUMIMO requires diff HW/
Antennas?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
On 3/4/15, 1:32 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
QAM256 is not new hardware, neither is
It is the same reason (the same concept at least) Marriot was fined $600k.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05677.91368270]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Not trying to be cagey below; I'm just cautious. If I answer that question, it
is a lot like answering when I stopped beating my wife. If I answered,
competion would be cutting and pasting to make it look like we charge SLAs JUST
for software updates. We do not.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
I have heard reports of operators in TN doing this and they were never shut
down
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
That's called malicious
So, assuming 2’ antennas at 38.7 dBi, your RSLs should be around -33.8 dBm (+/1
2.0 dB)
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Smart guys on lost question
I have never had problems using
Not as bad and with RF Armor, even better.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:02 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti radios with different xm/xw firmware
are they as leaky RF wise as Rockets?
Jaime Solorza
Are you reserving the 100 seats, or is it first come first serve?
When: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern
Time (US Canada).
Where: via link below AND call in number
Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time
adjustments.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
It's because you weren't taught this common core math garbage! =)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow ..close... I come up with 132.89 dB FSL and
The FCC document they gave me says 21 dBm tx power and that what is set on
radios according to guy who hired me to help verify path. One 3 ft dish
is on huge guyed tower and another on a monopole with several other drums
and a sectors.They experience signal drops during high winds. my guess
-30.39 dB FSL -40.41 dB urban area FSL report says 42db on antennas
and -27.5 dB so if I adjust mine I am -28.39dB. what a few dB's among
friends?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Hardy, Tim tha...@comsearch.com wrote:
So, assuming
Will it be recorded?
-Steve D
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Damn. I will be on tower if radio is bad or on drive back to El Paso on
Thursday afternoon . Next time
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 3, 2015 7:25 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
Sounds logical – a 3’ dish at 2° would be down about 10 dB and at 3° about 20
dB according to the pattern
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:14 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Smart guys on lost question
Hum...I have
I can and should
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05677.776D1980]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve D
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:52 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE Webinar -- The Full Monty for the AFMUG
Will
No. SLA, yes, but SLAs are normal to maintain support and to get software
upgrades (not just bug fixes)...and in our case, soon network monitoring free
for the first year from our own data center.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: Af
I don't need to check Gino. Gone over this a million times. No change in BTS OR
CPE.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:40 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
On 3/4/2015 11:44 AM, Matt wrote:
Quite not the case. Ever price typical LTE? And our licenses you own once first
bought, with no annual renewals.
Thought there was an annual license fee to get firmware updates etc?
Nope.
I have never had problems using simple free space path loss for these
frequencies.
I doubt there is significant cable or waveguide loss.
Dragonwaves mount to the antenna and the gain of the antenna is at the
interface.
96.6 + 20logD + 20log F Where F D are GHz and Miles.
96.6 + 10.5 +
Wow ..close... I come up with 132.89 dB FSL and 143.41 dB urban area FSL
..so I guess if I back out the 2dB loss I am within 1.2dB of the
calculations sent to me.
Okay i am close. Cool...I can still add and subtract..yeah me!
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar
(+/- 2.0 db)!
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Hardy, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Smart guys on lost question
So, assuming 2’ antennas at 38.7 dBi, your RSLs should be around -33.8 dBm (+/1
2.0 dB)
From: Af
Not wrong, just different. You guys are splitting aren't you?
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05676.AF602DB0]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:08 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re:
cool, good to know!
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
On 3/4/15, 1:42 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
I don't need to check Gino. Gone over this a million times. No change in
BTS OR CPE.
Patrick Leary
M
Monopoles are subject to the vortex shedding problem causing them to oscillate.
If the axis of the sway causes the dish to aim high and then low it would do
exactly what Jaime is guessing it is doing.
I would suggest mount the antennas lower if possible and/or use smaller dishes.
There is
Originally MT to Nanostation. Worked for years. Wanted to upgrade,
slapped on a Nanobeam (higher gain).
MT to Nanobeam wouldn't do WDS. Ubnt said they can't support it because
they're not both Ubnt.
Nanostation to Nanobeam wouldn't do WDS. Ubnt said they can't support it
because they're not
truer words haven't been spoken...
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
My larger point is that none of us should turn off our intellectual honesty
I’m got a pile of PowerBeam/NanoBeam or whatever you call them PTP links up and
they work fine. They would work better with DFS on the shorter links but a
couple of them are 10 miles. I’m running 5MHz channels on the longer ones
though, high-interference environments.
Rory
From: Af
+1
On 03/04/2015 11:02 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It's because you weren't taught this common core math garbage! =)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jaime Solorza
losguyswirel...@gmail.com
Did you ever talk to any of your state reps in congress?
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
Yep, lived it.
The discussions PGE ended
logical? Me? Hum, glad I watched every Star Trek episode...even the
cartoons! Live Long and Prosper
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Hardy, Tim tha...@comsearch.com wrote:
Sounds logical – a 3’ dish at 2° would be down about 10 dB and
I would think the other way. Many guyed towers are not 100% stable in
rotation, and running a PTP link from one would likely require torque
arrestors.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 8:51 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
The FCC document they gave me says 21 dBm tx power and that what is
There is no SLA for just firmware updates.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] About $12k
How much is the SLA for firmware updates?
Vortex shredding...What a terrifying phrase. All this winter the U.S. NE
quadrant has been polar vortex shredded!
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0567B.131B5970]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, March
With no noise, Nanobeams are just a dream. I have a link 11.2 miles with
95% airmax that are working beautifully.
In another location the link is totally crap, even with a -60. The noise
on the far tower just won't let it function. Note that ePMP worked very
well as a replacement.
Josh
are they as leaky RF wise as Rockets?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
With no noise, Nanobeams are just a dream. I have a link 11.2 miles with
95% airmax that are working beautifully.
In
They have a shield for these as well?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I like that they look like the Jupiter 2 on the 19dB version
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
well, that seems logical... you'd think UBNT would know that they made the
nanostation.
The only issues I've seen with NanoBeams have been a random reboot thing
I've been trying to figure out... I was wondering if it might be related to
the WDS thing, but I'm pretty sure it's just bad radios in
I have no mechanism that reserves. I openly put the invite on the list; the
first 100 in get in.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05676.1C466710]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:59 AM
Fortunately we did not have a lot of users on 900, we were using it for
distance but once we found the WARM grid antennas we were able to get stable
links on 2.4
Just wasn’t worth the fight.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, March 04,
How much is the SLA for firmware updates?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
No. SLA, yes, but SLAs are normal to maintain support and to get software
upgrades (not just bug fixes)...and in our case, soon network monitoring free
for the first year
Ex:
Authoritative ns1 and ns2 for your domains, ns3 authoritative in a different
geographical location?
Recursive/caching for clients?
Control all your own MX and SPF records?
So is there any way to get software updates outside of the SLA?
On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com wrote:
Not trying to be cagey below; I'm just cautious. If I answer that
question, it is a lot like answering when I stopped beating my wife. If I
answered,
PW is not SDR based
So call their Distributors and tell them to change their announcements.
Just google Purwave and SDR and you find some.
Uh, no. Definitely not good.
Here's one of mine for comparison. Which is also where I'm having odd
issues with two 3GHz 450 sectors. Not to mention the same problems at
sites with parasitics. I have another SyncInjector at another site
running a 5GHz 450 AP and it works fine. Plus dozens and
Hey all,
I'm curious, whom on the list is operating 3.65 GHz Wimax and what Base
Station equipment do you operate? More specifically, is anyone using
Purewave 6636 base stations?
phil
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
There is no SLA for just firmware updates.
So if I want a firmware update say over a year after purchase how much
would that cost? If I must have SLA to do that how much is that?
Matt, I am a skeptic too, and it's always wise to watch vendors for slippery
language, but I can tell you the
Why is it not software defined? Because DAN owned the core WIMAX software?
Purewave claimed to have purchased the rights to make their own mods, that
was one of their claimed advantages over PMP320. Not sure what Mercury
would say now. But don't they have a proprietary enhanced (but not LTE)
True about the pull vs. push. That is one of the things Mimosa has done so well
-- tools to manage the entire life cycle of the purchase experience. Their
online mechanisms are fantastic. We are lacking on that side, but we are deep
in the process of fixing it. When Telrad took over that side
That may be a good point Ken. I am using the SDR term in the sense that Vanu
Bose used it, who is one of the inventors. He explained this to me and other
invited panelists on the FCC's Spectrum Policy Task Force in 2002. I'm using it
in the sense of materially changing a piece of equipment from
That would make it untagged. I think dot1q on the physical interface and
then dot1q sub-interfaces would give you QinQ. Never tried it. I don't
have much Cisco VLAN experience outside of switching. Mikrotik is so
much easier.. and cheaper. :)
On 3/4/2015 2:11 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
What
Looks like the GPS is losing lock.
The counters I'm talking about are on the analog tab
On Mar 4, 2015 8:58 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I reset these counters about a week ago. I think this is not normal?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 1:57 AM, Forrest
Not OSHA approved. I have a few spare ones you can borrow for a Compact.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
wrote:
I think I need to get my old hard hat out of
Almost everybody who has an SDR sells you on the notion that it can be
upgraded later. Almost nobody ever actually does anything more than bug
fixes, or minor tweaks.
I think the only way Telrad might be odd with their SDR is that they
actually made different firmware to convert the unit
On 3/4/2015 1:40 PM, Matt wrote:
There is no SLA for just firmware updates.
So if I want a firmware update say over a year after purchase how much
would that cost? If I must have SLA to do that how much is that?
Matt, I am a skeptic too, and it's always wise to watch vendors for slippery
Purewave claiming SDR because they can add proprietary extensions seems
like Ubiquiti claiming to be SDR because they licensed Atheros driver code
so they could make AirMax.
I always thought SDR meant the signal processing, anything to do with
making sense of the RF, happened in software (FPGA
We do have one sub on a XW nanobeam running 5.6_beta talking to an XM
rocket on WDS. No issues.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 3/4/2015 11:11 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Not seeing this on m2 or m5 nanobeams. Maybe you had bad hardware?
:: Josh Reynolds, CIO, SPITwSPOTS - Pardon any
You are the subject, sir. Just not of this thread.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Patrick Leary patrick.le...@telrad.com
wrote:
Damn, how did my name get in the subject?
*Sent from my Verizon
That's the understanding of the term that I share. Thank you Jon.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Mar 4, 2015 2:15 PM, Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Purewave claiming SDR because they can add proprietary extensions seems like
Ubiquiti claiming to be SDR because they licensed
Work:
Authoritative: Yes, working on anycast via different datacenters with
different ASNs instead of your ns3 example.
Recursive: Yes, anycasted from multiple datacenters.
Personal/consulting authoritative: Amazon Route53.
I got back and forth on putting all authoritative on Route53. We host
Damn, how did my name get in the subject?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Mar 4, 2015 2:17 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Ubiquiti claimed carrier grade, too.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
I think it’s done all the time with the stuff the cellcos are deploying.
Probably limited only by antennas. No way are they changing out basestations
for every protocol or spectrum change like they did in the past.
There are even systems where the software defined radio is remote in a
Well, I got it... but I am not so tense today.
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:46 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE Webinar -- The Full Monty for the AFMUG
Yeah, I knew that… my attempt at levity, because the AFMUG list seems “tense”
today J
From:
On 3/4/2015 1:21 PM, Matt wrote:
There is no SLA for just firmware updates.
So if I want a firmware update say over a year after purchase how much
would that cost? If I must have SLA to do that how much is that?
Matt, I am a skeptic too, and it's always wise to watch vendors for
slippery
we do ns1 and 2 authoritative and are building caching today. For our size
operation there probably isnt a great deal of benefit to it, but it makes
us feel like we are big time
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:16 PM, e...@kuhnke-international.com
e...@kuhnke-international.com wrote:
Ex:
The guyed tower looks solidly built and guyed when I saw it a few weeks ago
on way to find a restaurant in Midland.
275 footer with dish at 150ft level
Jaime Solorza
On Mar 4, 2015 10:44 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Monopoles are subject to the vortex shedding problem causing them
They target the enterprise market. Way easier to work with than Cisco's
enterprise WiFi system IMO.
My apartment is a RF mess in 2.4Ghz. I've been cycling through WiFi vendors
every quarter or two for the past couple of years to see how their products
behave between my work, my wife's streaming
Hey Forrest, any luck on the updated build for the Base-1's, minus the
web GUI of course? I would really like to get the .0 row via SNMPwalk so
my indexed Cacti template works for both Base-1's and 2's.
On 3/4/2015 3:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
There are some pulse counts
Not seeing this on m2 or m5 nanobeams. Maybe you had bad hardware?
:: Josh Reynolds, CIO, SPITwSPOTS - Pardon any brevity, this message was sent via mobile device
On Mar 4, 2015 7:21 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:Ive found that Nanobeams have problems with WDS. I tried 5.5.9
Ubiquiti claimed carrier grade, too.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Purewave claiming SDR because they can add proprietary extensions seems
like Ubiquiti claiming
Its tomorrow
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Mar 4, 2015 2:40 PM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:
OK, I’m connected. It says “waiting for organizer”.
So, what do I do for the next 23 hours and 20 minutes?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Years ago I dug into the LTE protocol to see what it really was. My
recollection is it is a collection of a bunch of different modulation formats
that can be used as appropriate. I think it was expandable and built for
future flavors of modulation. Seems like one of the formats was very much
No chin strap, so yes definitely useless for climbing.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Mar 4, 2015 2:35 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Not OSHA approved. I have a few spare ones you can borrow for a Compact.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Alvarion had that as a dream, but was never able to realize it. It was only
achieved under the Telrad banner, but yes I do remember some months back more a
competing vendor telling people it was impossible to convert from WiMAX to LTE
without a hardware change.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G
Correct. That was an important achievement that deserves recognition.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0568B.54286240]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re:
understand
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
Fortunately we did not have a lot of users on 900, we were using it for
distance but once we
Patrick,
We embrace change and evolution its what has kept this company going
for 3 generations.
I just think of new tech as a chance to evolve or have that extra tool
in the toolbox
If you can please send me some specs on the gear and the antennas or
brochures.
Thanks
Dave
On 03/04/2015
'Tis a fine day, laddy!
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 3:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Welcome to the Af mailing list
Test, I'm back!
I don't care for brochures. May I send you actual manuals?
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D0568F.9B1B8B10]http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 3:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad
I will beg to differ. The cellcos are constantly changing radios. My dealing
are with ATT and VZW. The old analog bays were swapped for CDMA(Verizon)
and TDMA(ATT) style radios. Completely different radio sets. Then LTE
launched. Verizon installed brand new Lucent LTE base stations. Now with
xLTE,
well lookee here!
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Welcome to the Af mailing list
Test, I'm back!
Respectively,
Rick Harnish
Broadband Consultant Industry Analyst
Please try again.
Your ip was on a Mid-evil blacklist I had in place a few years back.
Thanks
Dave
On 03/04/2015 02:34 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
David, direct mails to you get bounced back...Have an alternative mail?
*Patrick Leary*
***M*727.501.3735
http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet
*From:*Af
Please send me a name, offlist. My understanding has been otherwise and very
clearly so. I am going to verify though.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:21 PM
To:
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150304/8c1b148a/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:45:38 -0700
From: Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
To: Animal Farm af@afmug.com
Sweet Home Alabama.
Roll Tide Jay. When is the next meeting. I want to come.
Time to hit the Sea-N-Suds on a 95’ day.
Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131
317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online:
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150304/8c1b148a/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:45:38 -0700
From: Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
To: Animal Farm af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Metric
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
