Re: [AFMUG] OSPF Question

So why is type 2 the default on most routers? For what reason would you use an E2 over an E1? > On May 13, 2018, at 17:40, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > wrote: > > O. They are all going out as Metric-type 2 > >> On May 13, 2018, at

Re: [AFMUG] OSPF Question

O. They are all going out as Metric-type 2 > On May 13, 2018, at 17:37, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > wrote: > > Correct. A is distributing default route. Directly to C (in theory but not > happening) and to B which is distributing to C currently.

Re: [AFMUG] OSPF Question

: > > OK, so only A is distributing the default route. as-type-1 or as-type-2? E1 > takes path costs into account. E2 does not. > > Bounce a neighbor and see if it fixes itself. I assume RouterOS. I've seen > weird stuff like this happen before. > >> On 5/13/2018 4:1

Re: [AFMUG] OSPF Question

Identical. Shouldn’t they both still show up on the routing table? > On May 13, 2018, at 17:17, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: > > What are your path costs? > >> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 4:15 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.n

Re: [AFMUG] OSPF Question

Only one - the Long one. The things connected to A take the direct path but the default is not coming through for some reason. > On May 13, 2018, at 17:12, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: > > How many default routes show up in the LSA table? > >> On

[AFMUG] OSPF Question

OSPF question: A—-B—-C And A——C A is the Internet peering router. C should end up with two default routes in it correct? One through B and one directly to C? What’s odd is everything on A populated on Cs route table as direct routes - except for the default route.

Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti ER-X

Have not had one fail yet since they came out. > On May 9, 2018, at 10:36, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Anybody have any opinions on the reliability of Ubiquiti ER-X and ER-X-SFP > routers? > > I was thinking they might be useful for a customer premises > router/CPE.one

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> -------- *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervall

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I tend to agree with you, yet again Mike. Although I still think it is stupid that they didn’t block out that frequency if they knew they were in a radar area. > On May 2, 2018, at 08:38, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I don't believe I saw anything in the FCC report that anything

Re: [AFMUG] OT Moviepass

https://m.boscovs.com/shop/prod/demeter-pick-me-up-kitten-fur-perfume/93594.htm?utm_source=Google_term=93594_content=Beauty+%3e+Fragrances+%3e+Perfume_campaign=CSE=CSE:Google=scplp2647_intid=2647=1o1_medium=CSE=EAIaIQobChMIsZLg-oDn2gIVh4TICh0SDQLKEAQYASABEgKNTvD_BwE > On May 2, 2018, at

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

Why do you need an audit? There are like 4 rules to follow. EIRP for: 900mhz 2.4GHz 3.65GHz 5GHz Add power plus antenna. > On May 2, 2018, at 01:15, Steve Jones wrote: > > wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names of vendors > who sell non

Re: [AFMUG] drones

ert Andrews <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: > > 5 miles around an airport they certainly are. And completely prohibited > without a waver.. > >> On 04/30/2018 08:19 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Actually hobbyists are not limited to how high they can fly. >>> On

Re: [AFMUG] drones

Actually hobbyists are not limited to how high they can fly. > On Apr 30, 2018, at 11:11, Forrest Christian (List Account) > wrote: > > From my understanding so far, while the spirit of what you're saying is true, > it is more complicated than that. > > If you're

Re: [AFMUG] drones

I don’t believe that for one second > On Apr 30, 2018, at 10:07, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > I heard the FCC enforcement bureau is using drones now to make sure everyone > put the FCC UNI-II stickers on their old Ubnt gear. > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Eric

Re: [AFMUG] drones

ey're a great tool. I don't know anyone who thinks they're a terrible idea > for things exactly like this. > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 7:22 AM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> I said this a year ago and got boooed off stage. Ag

Re: [AFMUG] drones

I said this a year ago and got boooed off stage. Agreed. They are immensely useful for planning. > On Apr 30, 2018, at 01:14, Steve Jones wrote: > > my contractor shot some drone pics on a site. other than the uber sloppy > cable this doesnt look as terrible as it

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

> *yawn* Ask Comcast, AT, or Verizon what their cost of acquisition is. It's > probably at least that per customer. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > &g

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

gt; Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 5:23:56 PM > Subject

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

Except it’s a $0 cost of acquisition when done in house. The phone person was already there and can be doing other things while talking to the customer. And I’ve yet to have out of house have the same quality as in house. > On Apr 27, 2018, at 17:44, Mike Hammett wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

Exactly. > On Apr 27, 2018, at 17:42, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> On 4/27/18 14:41, Mike Hammett wrote: >> Then I wouldn't worry about it. > > I think he's saying adding all the non-legit calls would exceed the monthly > minimum and he doesn't want to pay for those?

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> >> The Brothers WISP >> >> >> >> >> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> >> To:

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

nternet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 11:29:32 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support > > They som

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

at 3:23 PM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: Here's another $7 that would have gone down the drain... just got this call: "Is my Internet on?   I can't make phone calls with my phone and it

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

Here's another $7 that would have gone down the drain... just got this call: "Is my Internet on? I can't make phone calls with my phone and it wasn't working on the WiFi at work today". Um, that has absolutely nothing to do with your Internet through us, you'll need to contact

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

Not arguing... asking How do you handle the customers that just mash buttons? I just walked to take trash out of the office and the phone rings "Tech Support", I answer it and it's someone wanting to get service. I have no idea why he chose Support. Maybe he just thought he could get

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

e to serverplus that are >> similar in scope and cost? Funny this thread showed up considering was >> coming here to ask the specific question. >> >> OP, if youre looking for some input on certain outsourced callcenter, i have >> some offlist advice. >> >&g

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

looking for some input on certain outsourced callcenter, i have > some offlist advice. > > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 7:21 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> We don’t. We keep the network and customers running well enough there re

Re: [AFMUG] After Hours Tech Support

We don’t. We keep the network and customers running well enough there really aren’t many support calls in general - let alone at night. > On Apr 25, 2018, at 19:39, Matt wrote: > > How or what do you pay an employee to either answer phone calls or > return

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

Does your data circuit cross state lines? Comcast tried to sell me an interstate circuit. I had to nip that on the quote. > On Apr 24, 2018, at 23:20, Sterling Jacobson wrote: > > Then why is my upstream provider charging me USF fee on my broadband only > connection? >

Re: [AFMUG] Trouble/Support Ticketing

system that we can use internally > On Apr 19, 2018, at 08:33, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > Nice, but how do you integrate it with the customer info you need to have on > hand? > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Matt Hoppes > &

Re: [AFMUG] Trouble/Support Ticketing

we don't lose or forget things. > >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018, 12:14 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> You can open a ticket in Zendesk. >> >> Do you mean open a ticket the customer can refer to or for you to track? I >> guess

Re: [AFMUG] Trouble/Support Ticketing

You can open a ticket in Zendesk. Do you mean open a ticket the customer can refer to or for you to track? I guess you could do either. We sometimes open tickets in zendesk to email the customer. Really your billing/CRM system should be handling phone support tickets and linking them to

Re: [AFMUG] Trouble/Support Ticketing

We absolutely love zendesk. It helped productivity many times over. Prior we were all sharing an email box. > On Apr 18, 2018, at 19:07, Forrest Christian (List Account) > wrote: > > Yeah, I'm sort of leaning toward Zendesk just because of all of the > integrations. >

Re: [AFMUG] Hold music licensing

> million tunes in there? > >> On 4/15/2018 3:44 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Does anyone know of a central website on which you can pay licensing to use >> ASCAP, BMI licensed music on hold?

[AFMUG] Hold music licensing

Does anyone know of a central website on which you can pay licensing to use ASCAP, BMI licensed music on hold?

Re: [AFMUG] PCI Compliance scan rejecting wildcard cert (CN)

PCI is a joke, IMHO. It’s well intentioned. But throws errors for all kinds of things that aren’t. > On Apr 14, 2018, at 07:09, Paul Stewart wrote: > > Currently we still use some wildcards and have never had issues with PCI > (level 1) compliance from using them …. >

Re: [AFMUG] MDU coax

d quality Fconnectors. > 44-700MHz for amps and splitters and patch panels. > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 6:28 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> I figured. Any recommendation oh guru of knowledge? >> >>> On Apr 13, 2018, at 19

Re: [AFMUG] MDU coax

ngue > >> On 4/13/2018 7:17 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Does anyone have any suggestions for how to take OTA reception of TV and >> send it through existing coax in an MDU? Do I need some sort of amplifier, >> or will it work split off to say 50 units direct on the coax?

Re: [AFMUG] MDU coax

I figured. Any recommendation oh guru of knowledge? > On Apr 13, 2018, at 19:20, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > You need distribution amplifier. > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 6:17 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

[AFMUG] MDU coax

Does anyone have any suggestions for how to take OTA reception of TV and send it through existing coax in an MDU? Do I need some sort of amplifier, or will it work split off to say 50 units direct on the coax?

Re: [AFMUG] AirOS partial config?

Change a few things on several hundred radios without UNMS? So you’re planning to log into several hundred radios by hand, hit upload, hit apply and verify it came back? How about just write a quick Python script to SSH into the radio, sed the config file with the changes you want to make,

Re: [AFMUG] Pricing and High Speed Services

rade for the customer and leave > room to offer more later > > >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> So I'm looking at deploying 60GHz equipment, and we currently have a very >> small fiber network. With t

[AFMUG] Pricing and High Speed Services

So I'm looking at deploying 60GHz equipment, and we currently have a very small fiber network. With the 60GHz, fiber, and even 5GHz nanopops I can offer huge amounts of bandwidth to end users but I have two questions: * My wholesale bandwidth costs are dirt cheap (that's not a problem

Re: [AFMUG] new DNS

Well then. I’ll put a few more routers in my network. So they have to put equipment in my datacenter. :) > On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:18, Darin Steffl wrote: > > Cloudflare has posted that their goal is to be within 10ms of every ISP in > the world. So they're adding their

Re: [AFMUG] new DNS

The entry just wasn't cached locally. That being said, I'm impressed they seem to be incredibly connected -- more so than Google. On 4/3/18 10:09 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: Traceroute that. Look at the route for it. You might have used it for an OSPF router ID. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 9:04 AM Matt

Re: [AFMUG] new DNS

Never mind apparently we weren't cached.. 172.16.0.21 Query time: 3 msec On 4/3/18 10:04 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: So. 8.8.8.8 Query time: 40 msec 1.1.1.1 Query time: 2 msec 172.16.0.21 Query time: 30 msec Wait... what?!?!  How is CLoudFlare faster than my own local caching resolver

Re: [AFMUG] new DNS

So. 8.8.8.8 Query time: 40 msec 1.1.1.1 Query time: 2 msec 172.16.0.21 Query time: 30 msec Wait... what?!?! How is CLoudFlare faster than my own local caching resolver? On 4/3/18 10:03 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: It's clearly not hard.  It's obviously not expensive. I'm already doing it

Re: [AFMUG] Spectrum fiber demarc move

nado or have a fire contained in part >>> of the building the original demarc location is going to melt down while >>> the rest of the equipment is in the more secure room so the whole circuit >>> is down which makes me feel un-easy. >>> >>>> On Sun, Ap

Re: [AFMUG] Spectrum fiber demarc move

a data center in an existing building and >>> the finished room will be tornado proof which the original demarc location >>> is not. >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Matt Hoppes >>>> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net&

Re: [AFMUG] Spectrum fiber demarc move

Or just let it be and run new fiber from the DMarc to the NID or your router. Why do you need to move the dmarc? > On Mar 31, 2018, at 13:13, TJ Trout wrote: > > move it yourself. If it was cat5 you wouldn't have a problem right? Fiber is > easier to work on then cat5 in my

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

Reynolds    <j...@kyneticwifi.com <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyJXDdlD4jQ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyJXDdlD4jQ>    "IN-DE GO" :)    On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Matt H

Re: [AFMUG] Eaton ConnectUPS-BD Web/SNMP Card

support request but > don't hold much hope for a real response. > >> On 3/29/2018 11:39 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> *following* >> >>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:16, Jeff Evans <afmugli...@pennwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>> Any one know of any

Re: [AFMUG] Eaton ConnectUPS-BD Web/SNMP Card

*following* > On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:16, Jeff Evans wrote: > > Any one know of any tricks to reset the password on these cards? I've > followed along in the manual but nothing seems to work, I can access it via > serial and http but can't otherwise reset the

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

you get about 8000 subs I doubt you can do it anywhere close to the cost that Lane can. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, 3:42 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:

[AFMUG] Test - November 22 2013

Test sent November 22 2013 @ 1234 Testing mailing list delay.

Re: [AFMUG] BGP Viewing Glass

gt; ---- *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, March 26, 2018 5:54:25 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] BGP Viewing Glass What is a good website/service to use to vi

[AFMUG] BGP Viewing Glass

What is a good website/service to use to view BGP AS routes/sessions/advertisements to observe why inbound traffic to your IP addresses might be taking one route over another?

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

w, I just made a different decision. I pay > ServerPlus to handle my support. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

tps://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ---- *From: *

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: You're missing my point. Support calls are mayb

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

.. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: Interesting point. We are at 1,000

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

from that perspective to ensure you are being > realistic with yourself when analyzing profitability. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 25, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> >> wrote: >> >> Eh. You’re putting a price on we

Re: [AFMUG] florida bridge - check your harness

shortcuts, im guessing thats not the only > cut corner by them. > >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018, 5:45 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> Is there a better quality video? >> >> It’s hard to tell what may have failed. But th

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

the above figures, you come out at a cost that is > almost always twice the pay rate. > > From: Matt Hoppes > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 5:03 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus > > How do you get that Chuck? > > Assuming taxes and all that

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

t; - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 5:46:00 PM

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

0-$400/month. > > That pays a weeks wage for an employee who can now also do other things. > > On Mar 25, 2018, at 17:50, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How much were you planning on paying serverplus? > >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018, 3:44 PM Matt Hop

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

gt; Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 5:46:00 PM > Subjec

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

s? > >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018, 3:44 PM Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> Interesting point. We are at 1,000 subs I and I just did this economic >> model. >> >> I don’t have 24x7 support. But do have 9-9. >> >> With

Re: [AFMUG] florida bridge - check your harness

Is there a better quality video? It’s hard to tell what may have failed. But that’s scary. > On Mar 25, 2018, at 17:51, Mathew Howard wrote: > > It's really hard to tell which part went first from that video... it's > interesting that it failed right at the point where

[AFMUG] Test 1132 Sunday

Sunday Sunday.

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

> was said to be in between Telrad and Baicells. > > I'm hoping they make a smaller IDU, because at lots of sites we'd pay for 8 > ports and use 1 or 2 of them. > > Is list magically working now? > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Matt Hoppes" <

Re: [AFMUG] list dead?

It died. > On Mar 24, 2018, at 09:02, George Skorup wrote: > > Did the list dieded or is it just me?

Re: [AFMUG] test (list lag time)

It is now Sunday the 25th. Lag: 5 days. > On Mar 25, 2018, at 07:26, Sean Heskett wrote: > > recieved Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM MDT :-/ > > -sean > > >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >> Posted Saturday March 17 9:21 MDT >

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

;>>> On Mar 14, 2018, at 04:27, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> That's how it's pronounced... >>>> >>>> Maybe a regional thing? >>>> >>>>> On Mar 11, 2018 2:02 PM, "Matt Hoppes" &

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

Over three days. > On Mar 21, 2018, at 21:54, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > I am sending this at 11:41am on 3/18/2018. > > Jay Weekley wrote: >> Same here. >> >> Matt Hoppes wrote: >>> Is this thi

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

om: Seth Mattinen > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

om: Seth Mattinen > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

h 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

h 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

h 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

h 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

Message- From: Seth Mattinen > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the ot

Re: [AFMUG] Test test

h 18, 2018 9:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Test test > >> On 3/16/18 13:35, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days. > > > I sent a couple messages the other day and haven't seen any of them yet. > Maybe I won't make it either.

Re: [AFMUG] testing

Huh. But amazon is such a reliable platform. > On Mar 18, 2018, at 14:00, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> On 3/15/18 6:32 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >> I posted two items and they haven't made to list in two days. Must be >> Russians or Aliens. > > Nothing I'm sending has been

[AFMUG] Cambium LTE

What’s known about the Cambium LTE product so far?

Re: [AFMUG] Expenses

umber or car mechanic to do it, then I am sure > you can expense it ! > > :) > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > http://www.snappytelecom.net > > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappyteleco

Re: [AFMUG] Expenses

Yes. But after it had healed from an off the job injury. > On Mar 15, 2018, at 21:02, Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com> wrote: > > Did you hurt it on the job? > > Keefe > > >> On 3/14/2018 4:52 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: >> So I got to thinking about somet

[AFMUG] Test test

Is this thing on? Messages seem to be being delayed by days.

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

It’s In Di Go. Like the color. Not In Dee Go. Like a butchered version of the six fingered man. > On Mar 14, 2018, at 04:27, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > That's how it's pronounced... > > Maybe a regional thing? > >> On Mar 11, 2018

[AFMUG] Expenses

So I got to thinking about something today. Pretty much anything needed to run the business you can expense. What about a surgery? Being the principle owner of a small shop I have to be able to work. If without a surgery (say rotator cuff of something) the business won’t run - is there a

Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus

GTC does this too. I don’t know why it’s so hard. The company I used to work for was “Indigo Wireless”. They always say In Dee Go. > On Mar 11, 2018, at 14:50, Sterling Jacobson wrote: > > They are working well for us, and I have a horrible generic support DT, lol! >

Re: [AFMUG] Employee Birthdays

And it was like I'm curious to hear from any size company > On Mar 9, 2018, at 19:18, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it depends if you have 5, or 50 employees? > >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyint

[AFMUG] Employee Birthdays

Just curious what any of you might do for employees birthdays for the employee?

Re: [AFMUG] OT where to eat

At mugshots bar and grill. 100 yards to the right from hotel > On Mar 5, 2018, at 19:19, Chuck McCown wrote: > > In BHM Sheraton. Where to eat?

Re: [AFMUG] WIFI Calling UGH!

Nope. Just one customer using Republic Wireless having some odd issue. Otherwise it’s business as usual and I use it all the time myself. > On Mar 3, 2018, at 12:15, David M wrote: > > hello to the borg > > I have a couple of customers who have an issue with wifi calling

Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

gt; wrote: > > That really isn't real choice's fault. > As an ISP you should probably already have a landing point in a data center > somewhere. > >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> Sur

Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

er that has decent > connectivity and you can too can get access to these things. > >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Matt Hoppes >> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >> How are people getting direct fiber feeds for $100/month? >> >> Clearly

Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

.@hagerstownfiber.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 6:01:32 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV >> >> That’s actually a good point. This is a rapidly moving area. I don’t want to >> choose the wrong technology/solut

Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

net > > > On Feb 23, 2018, at 6:23 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > The statement of the week... > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > >

Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

nternet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ---

  1   2   >