To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-available-ipv6-support-for-amazon-s3/
On Oct 27, 2016 2:49 PM, "Mike Hammett"
<af...@ics-il.net<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Anyone in AWS won't, given AWS's poor to no
2016 7:52:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2016/10/amazon-route-53-now-supports-dns-queries-over-ipv6-networks/
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2016/10/ipv6-support-for-cloudfront-waf-and-s3-transfer-acceleration/
Still no A
XSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, October 27, 2016 5:19:03 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
>
> https://aws.amazon.co
27, 2016 5:19:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-available-ipv6-support-for-amazon-s3/
On Oct 27, 2016 2:49 PM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote:
Anyone in AWS won't, given AWS's poor to no IPv6 support.
hebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Jason Wilson" <ja...@remotelylocated.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:48:07 PM
> *Subject: *
.com] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
I'll email you offlist.
On 10/27/2016 2:54 PM, Jason Wilson wrote:
Simon. Let's talk.
On Oct 27, 2016 12:50 PM, "Simon Westlake"
<simon@sonar.
hursday, October 27, 2016 11:23 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
while I’m not a fan of NAT64, CGN etc (but understand in
some situations the need for it), I completely agree
th
/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> –
>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
>>
>>
>>
>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
>>
>> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
>>
>> Office: 314-735-0270
>>
>> E-Mail:
Good marketing feature perhaps.
From: Jason Wilson
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
Is sonar the only CRM that supports IPV6?
I know currently Visp Does not.
Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet
ercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Stewart
*Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:00 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
sday, October 27, 2016 2:48:07 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
Is sonar the only CRM that supports IPV6?
I know currently Visp Does not.
Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736
530-748-9608 Cell
www.rem
coverage.com
>
> Office: 314-735-0270
>
> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Paul Stewart
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:00 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
&g
2016 2:36:28 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
It should be, but not more so than pure routed IPv4. NAT has additional latency
due to port mapping and lookup overhead.
On Oct 27, 2016 2:21 PM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote:
There have been sev
ISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
>
e:
>
>
>
> What we all need, is a low cost solution to stop needing more V4 IPs.
>
>
>
> If it is CGN at the edge with a limited pool of V4, so be it.
>
>
>
> But I want a solid solution that can be trusted.
>
> And I want and expert to come drop it into my comp
70
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Stewart
*Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:00 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
Actually in my opinion what we need is better
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:19:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
Costs are rising pretty fast. But yeah, why change if you don’t have to. So,
Dennis, create V6 in a box that will allow us to assign only V6 to all new
customers but will do the CGNAT for us at the edge
: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
I would totally agree here. We have deployed IPv6 quite a bit for clients, our
networks etc. However, the major issue is the hosting companies, most big
guys, google, amazon, etc all support IPv6, heck
l Stewart
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
Actually in my opinion what we need is better IPv6 adoption in general and this
becomes a non-problem quickly :)
I know .. good theory … and “we” are getting better though …. a lot o
o come drop it into my company.
>
> From: Paul Stewart <>
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:23 AM
> To: af@afmug.com <>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
>
> while I’m not a fan of NAT64, CGN etc (but understand in some situations the
&g
ktechs.net>
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
What we all need, is a low cost solution to stop needing more V4 IPs.
If it is CGN at the edge with
11:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] IPV6 deploymernt
while I’m not a fan of NAT64, CGN etc (but understand in some situations the
need for it), I completely agree that companies will be looking for consultants
to help with this in some scenarios (both large and small companies
while I’m not a fan of NAT64, CGN etc (but understand in some situations the
need for it), I completely agree that companies will be looking for consultants
to help with this in some scenarios (both large and small companies alike) -
this has been ongoing in some larger companies for many years
23 matches
Mail list logo
