s%20Proposal.wmv?dl=0
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> --
> *From: *"Jason McKemie" >
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25:00 AM
> *Subj
ed
> area around an earth station, you need their permission.
> http://www.fcc.gov/rulemaking/12-148
>
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie
>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuabl
/rulemaking/12-148
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz
spectrum | PCWorld
Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements?
Suggested reading? I'm
, March 28, 2015 10:25:00 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz
spectrum | PCWorld
Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements?
Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here
is all ove
Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements?
Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around
here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not
good news if it actually soon will.
On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg
AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz
spectrum | PCWorld
Maybe not. Typically FCC and auction doesn't fall within my budget though. I
was hoping they would just extend the 3650 rules to cover more spectrum.
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Ken Hohh
Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list...
I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very
good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will
incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent
Access, Priority Access and
Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
> So here's what we've been advocating for a while.
>
> -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like
> unlicensed)
> -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs
So here's what we've been advocating for a while.
-Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed)
-Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee)
-Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply
for PALs at a decent p
t:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable
> 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
>
> "The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers" - this sounds
> bad.
>
> On Friday
t;Ken Hohhof" wrote:
> May not be as bad as you’re thinking.
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable
> 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
>
> "The
t;Ken Hohhof" wrote:
> May not be as bad as you’re thinking.
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable
> 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
>
> "The
May not be as bad as you’re thinking.
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz
spectrum | PCWorld
"The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers" - this sound
"The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers" - this sounds bad.
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html
Jaime Solorza
15 matches
Mail list logo
