Re: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths

2017-02-13 Thread Sterling Jacobson
Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dev Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 5:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS

Re: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths

2017-02-12 Thread Carlos Alcantar
, 2017 4:31:06 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS over just using separate subnets to ease congestion if I don’t have multiple redundant paths

[AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths

2017-02-12 Thread Dev
If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS over just using separate subnets to ease congestion if I don’t have multiple redundant paths that I need to be able to route around? I understand there is advantages