Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dev
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 5:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths
If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to
avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS
, 2017 4:31:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] MPLS for non-redundant paths
If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to
avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS over just using separate
subnets to ease congestion if I don’t have multiple redundant paths
If I have a hub-and-spokes topology I want to do some traffic engineering on to
avoid congestion, is there an advantage to MPLS over just using separate
subnets to ease congestion if I don’t have multiple redundant paths that I need
to be able to route around? I understand there is advantages