Re: [AFMUG] Help!!!

[Jaime Solorza]

We got them!!! Shipping out to site!!! Thanks

Jaime Solorza

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 4:59 PM Mitch Koep  wrote:

> You might check with Scan Source they usually have
>
> Mitch
>
> On 4/12/2018 3:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> I've got one too, that I can sell you if it helps...
>
> I think pretty much everywhere is out of stock right now. Streakwave told
> me they where expecting them any day... but that was a couple of weeks ago
> (I'm waiting for low band), and they may have already sold everything they
> had coming anyway.
>
> You can try ubnt.com/stock
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jesse DuPont <
> jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:
>
>> I've got one...
>>
>> *Jesse DuPont*
>>
>> Network Architect
>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
>> Celerity Networks LLC
>>
>> Celerity Broadband LLC
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>>
>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
>> On 4/12/18 2:14 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>
>> Need 6 AirFiber 11fx high band duplexors asap?  Who has them?
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help!!!

[Mitch Koep]

You might check with Scan Source they usually have

Mitch


On 4/12/2018 3:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:

I've got one too, that I can sell you if it helps...

I think pretty much everywhere is out of stock right now. Streakwave 
told me they where expecting them any day... but that was a couple of 
weeks ago (I'm waiting for low band), and they may have already sold 
everything they had coming anyway.


You can try ubnt.com/stock 

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jesse DuPont 
> 
wrote:


I've got one...

*_Jesse DuPont_*

Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net

Celerity Networks LLC

Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com /celeritynetworksllc

Like us! facebook.com /celeritybroadband

On 4/12/18 2:14 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

Need 6 AirFiber 11fx high band duplexors asap?  Who has them?

Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help!!!

[Mathew Howard]

I've got one too, that I can sell you if it helps...

I think pretty much everywhere is out of stock right now. Streakwave told
me they where expecting them any day... but that was a couple of weeks ago
(I'm waiting for low band), and they may have already sold everything they
had coming anyway.

You can try ubnt.com/stock

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jesse DuPont  wrote:

> I've got one...
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 4/12/18 2:14 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> Need 6 AirFiber 11fx high band duplexors asap?  Who has them?
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help!!!

[Jesse DuPont]

  
  
I've got one...


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 4/12/18 2:14 PM, Jaime Solorza
  wrote:


  Need 6 AirFiber 11fx high band duplexors asap? 
Who has them? 

Jaime Solorza
  


  

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Lewis Bergman]

Damn Jaimie, look that that messy loop.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018, 8:47 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Feb 26, 2018 5:37 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That probe will be connected here on lower left side of back
>> panel...about to test continuity and megg the wires.
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2018 2:02 PM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Come on up, I have some for ya J  you can even stay at my place J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz
>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 2:41 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking for private places to consume the Tecate !  ... h so I see...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
>>> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> *To: *"Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
>>> *Sent: *Monday, February 26, 2018 2:45:31 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>>>
>>> 洛
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Working inside a tank..
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Jaime Solorza]

That probe will be connected here on lower left side of back panel...about
to test continuity and megg the wires.

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 2:02 PM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote:

> Come on up, I have some for ya J  you can even stay at my place J
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz
> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 2:41 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>
>
>
> Looking for private places to consume the Tecate !  ... h so I see...
>
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, February 26, 2018 2:45:31 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>
> 洛
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Working inside a tank..
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Dennis Burgess]

Come on up, I have some for ya ☺  you can even stay at my place ☺

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 2:41 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Looking for private places to consume the Tecate !  ... h so I see...

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
http://www.snappytelecom.net

Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net<mailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net>


From: "Jaime Solorza" 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>>
To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 2:45:31 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
洛
Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Working inside a tank..
Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Jaime Solorza]

Si senor

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 1:40 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:

> Looking for private places to consume the Tecate !  ... h so I see...
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, February 26, 2018 2:45:31 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>
> 洛
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Working inside a tank..
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Mitch Koep]

Don't bend over


On 2/26/2018 1:45 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

Oh no...The Probe!!!

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 12:28 PM, "Jaime Solorza" > wrote:


Working inside a tank..
Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Faisal Imtiaz]

Looking for private places to consume the Tecate ! ... h so I see... 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
http://www.snappytelecom.net 

Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 2:45:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

> 洛

> Jaime Solorza

> On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < losguyswirel...@gmail.com > wrote:

>> Working inside a tank..
>> Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Steve Jones]

some people pay good money for that

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> 4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..藍
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
> How was the probing?
>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza
> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
>
> Working inside a tank..
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Bill Prince]

Say "Hi!" to Scully.

bp


On 2/26/2018 12:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..藍

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown" > wrote:


How was the probing?
*From:* Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM
*To:* Animal Farm
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!
Working inside a tank..
Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Jaime Solorza]

4G LTE worked fine in there!!! As for probing...I don't kiss and tell..藍

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 12:49 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

How was the probing?

*From:* Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM
*To:* Animal Farm
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Working inside a tank..
Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Chuck McCown]

How was the probing?

From: Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 12:35 PM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

Working inside a tank..

Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Bill Prince]

Radio waves probably don't propagate very well.


bp


On 2/26/2018 11:35 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

Working inside a tank..
Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] Help I got abducted!!

[Jaime Solorza]

洛

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 26, 2018 12:35 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:

> Working inside a tank..
> Jaime Solorza
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help identifying Mikrotik radios

[Seth Mattinen]

On 2/22/18 8:45 AM, Chris Herrington wrote:

Could someone please tell me the part/model numbers on these radios?

Mikrotik is not my thing




Check out routerboard.com and scroll through the pictures. Looks like a 
version of the SXT.

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify this unit please

[Josh Reynolds]

No problem :)

On Sep 28, 2017 7:56 PM, "Chris Herrington" <ch...@fsc.com> wrote:

> Thank you josh!!
>
>
>
> Chris Herrington, PMP, RCDD/OSP Specialist
>
> FCC Lic. # PG-11-19440
>
> Cell 714-309-8714 <(714)%20309-8714>
>
> ch...@fsc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:17 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify this unit please
>
>
>
> ICC 6port mobile patch panel
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017 7:08 PM, "Chris Herrington" <ch...@fsc.com> wrote:
>
> I have been asked to upgrade an network in a 100+ student housing facility.
>
>
>
> I am curious as to what the black box is.  Never seen one and could not
> find any labels.
>
>
>
> Also, if anyone wants to help provide and program switches to distribute a
> gigabit circuit to these 100+ units please contact me.  Vendors welcome
>
>
>
> I will also need a Wi-fi unit in each room.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Chris H
>
>
>
> Chris Herrington, PMP, RCDD/OSP Specialist
>
> FCC Lic. # PG-11-19440
>
> [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE86F2.B9D9CF30]
>
> Full Spectrum Communications
>
> Consulting, Engineering, Installation
>
> Communications & Electrical Contractor #450317
>
> US Mail: PO Box 60905 Irvine CA 92602
>
> Visit us at: 420 Exchange, Suite 270  Irvine, CA  92602
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=420+Exchange,+Suite+270%C2%A0+Irvine,+CA%C2%A0+92602=gmail=g>
>
> 800-897-7287 <(800)%20897-7287>, 714-897-3789 <(714)%20897-3789> Chris
> Cell 714-309-8714 <(714)%20309-8714>
>
> ch...@fsc.com
>
> http://www.fsc.com
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify this unit please

[Chris Herrington]

Thank you josh!!

 

Chris Herrington, PMP, RCDD/OSP Specialist

FCC Lic. # PG-11-19440

Cell 714-309-8714

ch...@fsc.com

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify this unit please

 

ICC 6port mobile patch panel

 

On Sep 28, 2017 7:08 PM, "Chris Herrington" <ch...@fsc.com> wrote:

I have been asked to upgrade an network in a 100+ student housing facility.

 

I am curious as to what the black box is.  Never seen one and could not find 
any labels.

 

Also, if anyone wants to help provide and program switches to distribute a 
gigabit circuit to these 100+ units please contact me.  Vendors welcome

 

I will also need a Wi-fi unit in each room.

 

Thanks, Chris H

 

Chris Herrington, PMP, RCDD/OSP Specialist

FCC Lic. # PG-11-19440

cid:image001.jpg@01CE86F2.B9D9CF30

Full Spectrum Communications

Consulting, Engineering, Installation

Communications & Electrical Contractor #450317

US Mail: PO Box 60905 Irvine CA 92602

Visit us at: 420 Exchange, Suite 270 
<https://maps.google.com/?q=420+Exchange,+Suite+270%C2%A0+Irvine,+CA%C2%A0+92602=gmail=g>
   Irvine, CA  92602

800-897-7287 <tel:(800)%20897-7287> , 714-897-3789 <tel:(714)%20897-3789>  
Chris Cell 714-309-8714 <tel:(714)%20309-8714> 

ch...@fsc.com

http://www.fsc.com <http://www.fsc.com/> 

 

 

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify this unit please

[Josh Reynolds]

ICC 6port mobile patch panel

On Sep 28, 2017 7:08 PM, "Chris Herrington"  wrote:

> I have been asked to upgrade an network in a 100+ student housing facility.
>
>
>
> I am curious as to what the black box is.  Never seen one and could not
> find any labels.
>
>
>
> Also, if anyone wants to help provide and program switches to distribute a
> gigabit circuit to these 100+ units please contact me.  Vendors welcome
>
>
>
> I will also need a Wi-fi unit in each room.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Chris H
>
>
>
> Chris Herrington, PMP, RCDD/OSP Specialist
>
> FCC Lic. # PG-11-19440
>
> [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE86F2.B9D9CF30]
>
> Full Spectrum Communications
>
> Consulting, Engineering, Installation
>
> Communications & Electrical Contractor #450317
>
> US Mail: PO Box 60905 Irvine CA 92602
>
> Visit us at: 420 Exchange, Suite 270  Irvine, CA  92602
> 
>
> 800-897-7287 <(800)%20897-7287>, 714-897-3789 <(714)%20897-3789> Chris
> Cell 714-309-8714 <(714)%20309-8714>
>
> ch...@fsc.com
>
> http://www.fsc.com
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] help understanding and troubleshooting bgp from the target perspective

[Steve Jones]

I couldn't say for sure at this point. it was such a problem I had to move
the traffic.

they did respond that they have an "issue" theyre working on with transit
to chicago. I'm assuming whatever it was that the original issue was
"resolved" with this started shortly after their peering skipped ASNs and
was suddenly right on level3

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:

> Is traffic leaving and arriving through the same provider? Sounds similar
> to a Reverse Path Forwarding issue I had a long time ago.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:59 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] help understanding and troubleshooting bgp from the
> target perspective
>
>
>
> we have been dealing with amazon issues on one of our upstreams
>
> they had some BGP issues where they werent sending our announcements to
> the world, watching the peering all of a sudden they were peered with
> level3 directly, our announcements were working but we started having
> skullduggery with amazon and images, im guessing either AWS hosted or in a
> similar locale
>
>
>
> moving them to our other provider (ended up terminating our peering
> session) and all was resolved
>
>
>
> I have figured out how to poke around in looking glasses and that to get
> general paths, but with  the whole distributed hosting and geolocation dns
> or whatever, how do i get to a point where i can discover what actual
> server theyre getting to and then be able to find out what our ASN looks
> like from their perspective?
>
>
>
> I think this was an asynchronous path in which one of the directions was
> horrible
>
>
>
> basic testing, just to the IP resolving to amazon.com each provider path
> showed a different IP in resolution using the same DNS servers, which is
> odd, i guess, we just run bind recursive with no geo magician .voodoo.
>
>
>
> the problem provider had huge latency to both IPs the other was good, from
> our ASN
>
>
>
> Now hitting the same IP from our edge router, presenting as our provider
> IP space the path was different but clean, I asssume thats their internal
> routing or something.
>
>
>
> long story short, without knowing an engineer at amazon, (or any other
> target) is there a way to see the path back to our ASN?
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] help understanding and troubleshooting bgp from the target perspective

[Chris Wright]

Is traffic leaving and arriving through the same provider? Sounds similar to a 
Reverse Path Forwarding issue I had a long time ago.

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:59 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] help understanding and troubleshooting bgp from the target 
perspective

 

we have been dealing with amazon issues on one of our upstreams

they had some BGP issues where they werent sending our announcements to the 
world, watching the peering all of a sudden they were peered with level3 
directly, our announcements were working but we started having skullduggery 
with amazon and images, im guessing either AWS hosted or in a similar locale

 

moving them to our other provider (ended up terminating our peering session) 
and all was resolved

 

I have figured out how to poke around in looking glasses and that to get 
general paths, but with  the whole distributed hosting and geolocation dns or 
whatever, how do i get to a point where i can discover what actual server 
theyre getting to and then be able to find out what our ASN looks like from 
their perspective?

 

I think this was an asynchronous path in which one of the directions was 
horrible

 

basic testing, just to the IP resolving to amazon.com each provider path showed 
a different IP in resolution using the same DNS servers, which is odd, i guess, 
we just run bind recursive with no geo magician .voodoo.

 

the problem provider had huge latency to both IPs the other was good, from our 
ASN

 

Now hitting the same IP from our edge router, presenting as our provider IP 
space the path was different but clean, I asssume thats their internal routing 
or something.

 

long story short, without knowing an engineer at amazon, (or any other target) 
is there a way to see the path back to our ASN?

 

 

Re: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

[Brandon Yuchasz]

Perfect. Ill be sure to use the help with erections in the ad. I suspect I
will get extra replies that way.

Thanks!

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 5:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

 

SWM* needs help with erections.

 

(Small WISP Manager)

 

That ought to do it.  

 

From: Brandon Yuchasz 

Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 4:35 PM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

 

Anyone want to share your standard craigslist / want ad text you use when
looking for an installer, occasional tower climber ? I need to try and get
two new guys trained up and running on their own with site surveys and
installs in the next month or two.  Before now word of mouth and personal
references lead us to helpers but I need to move beyond that .

 

Thanks,

Brandon Yuchasz

 

 

Re: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

[Chuck McCown]

SWM* needs help with erections.

(Small WISP Manager)

That ought to do it.  

From: Brandon Yuchasz 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 4:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

Anyone want to share your standard craigslist / want ad text you use when 
looking for an installer, occasional tower climber ? I need to try and get two 
new guys trained up and running on their own with site surveys and installs in 
the next month or two.  Before now word of mouth and personal references lead 
us to helpers but I need to move beyond that .

 

Thanks,

Brandon Yuchasz

 

 

Re: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

[Brandon Yuchasz]

In addition in case someone is reading this that is looking for work or
knows someone looking. We are looking for Iron County WI and Gogebic County
MI.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Yuchasz
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 5:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] help wanted ad ( install monkey)

 

Anyone want to share your standard craigslist / want ad text you use when
looking for an installer, occasional tower climber ? I need to try and get
two new guys trained up and running on their own with site surveys and
installs in the next month or two.  Before now word of mouth and personal
references lead us to helpers but I need to move beyond that .

 

Thanks,

Brandon Yuchasz

 

 

Re: [AFMUG] Help with setting up OpenVPN server on a Mikrotik

[Chris Wright]

The Wiki is pretty thorough. Is there something specific that's tripping you up?
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/OpenVPN

Chris Wright
Network Administrator
Velociter Wireless
209-838-1221 x115

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 5:59 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Help with setting up OpenVPN server on a Mikrotik

I am very new to this topic and can't quite see a tutorial on how to do this.

Does anyone have any insight on this, a quick link or some overview info that 
might be helpful?

If so, It would be greatly appreciated!

:)

Paul

Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[Jaime Solorza]

Use Z bracing... Much sturdier.
On Jul 10, 2015 5:21 PM, Lewis Bergman lewis.berg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nobody I know would put a rod in a horizontal position like that on a span
 that large. To flexible. My guess would be a local job as someone else
 suggested. Having said that, a pretty good looking home job. If you are
 trying to get a base piece take it down and have a fabricator make one to
 match.

 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015, 4:54 PM Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote:

 Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected in
 another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the
 Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup
 truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in
 the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he went
 south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on the tower
 or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at the base is
 2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but haven't found
 anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size within the bolt
 together sections.  The First section appears to be 50' tall.  The
 Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the tower on 1 side, and
 U Clamped on the other.

 Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[Erich Kaiser]

I have seen multiple of these fabricated towers in IL, mainly to the south
of I-80.  Not sure, but they are fairly solid, suggestion, have Brandon
take down the Dipole antenna if not needed anymore or it will be wiggly up
top


Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291


On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:

 I recognize that tower.

 Some 2way towers I think were locally fabricated.  That one maybe by the
 Scary Tower Manufacturing Company.


 -Original Message- From: Nate Burke
 Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 4:54 PM
 To: Animal Farm
 Subject: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

 Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected in
 another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the
 Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup
 truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in
 the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he went
 south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on the tower
 or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at the base is
 2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but haven't found
 anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size within the bolt
 together sections.  The First section appears to be 50' tall.  The
 Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the tower on 1 side, and
 U Clamped on the other.

 Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[George Skorup]

That's odd. My guess is if the legs are solid rod, it's probably Pirod.

On 7/10/2015 4:53 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected 
in another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the 
Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup 
truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in 
the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he 
went south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on 
the tower or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at 
the base is 2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but 
haven't found anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size 
within the bolt together sections.  The First section appears to be 
50' tall.  The Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the 
tower on 1 side, and U Clamped on the other.


Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[Ken Hohhof]

I recognize that tower.

Some 2way towers I think were locally fabricated.  That one maybe by the 
Scary Tower Manufacturing Company.



-Original Message- 
From: Nate Burke

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 4:54 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected in
another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the
Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup
truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in
the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he went
south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on the tower
or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at the base is
2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but haven't found
anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size within the bolt
together sections.  The First section appears to be 50' tall.  The
Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the tower on 1 side, and
U Clamped on the other.

Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[Nate Burke]

That sounds like something for a WISP Themed Haunted House.


On 7/10/2015 5:09 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I recognize that tower.

Some 2way towers I think were locally fabricated.  That one maybe by 
the Scary Tower Manufacturing Company.



-Original Message- From: Nate Burke
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 4:54 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected in
another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the
Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup
truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in
the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he went
south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on the tower
or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at the base is
2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but haven't found
anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size within the bolt
together sections.  The First section appears to be 50' tall.  The
Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the tower on 1 side, and
U Clamped on the other.

Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help Identify This Tower

[Lewis Bergman]

Nobody I know would put a rod in a horizontal position like that on a span
that large. To flexible. My guess would be a local job as someone else
suggested. Having said that, a pretty good looking home job. If you are
trying to get a base piece take it down and have a fabricator make one to
match.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015, 4:54 PM Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote:

 Was moved to this location in the early 80's, was originally erected in
 another location.  Could easily be from the 50's or 60's.  From the
 Farmer that owns it  In the early 80's My Dad took my 1974 pickup
 truck and drove to the manufacturer and picked up a new base to put in
 the concrete.  He was only gone for a couple hours, and I think he went
 south From southwest of Chicago  No Markings of any kind on the tower
 or base.  Base of the tower is 7.5' Across.  Leg diameter at the base is
 2.25   We've looked through Rohn, Trilon and Pirod, but haven't found
 anything similar. The Legs actually taper down in size within the bolt
 together sections.  The First section appears to be 50' tall.  The
 Standoffs you see in the picture are welded to the tower on 1 side, and
 U Clamped on the other.

 Nate

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[Adam Moffett via Af]

That's priceless.


I think it’s like the “5 second rule”:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-second_rule
If you ask a group of moms if that’s true, you’ll be met with the same 
dead silence (and averted eyes).
Now turning off someone else’s equipment to see if it’s causing you 
interference, that’s taking “testing” liberties too far.  Which 
reminds me, I had another WISP do that to me, the funny thing is my 
equipment never actually went down, because there was a UPS on top of 
the grain leg, and they flipped the breaker at the bottom.  But they 
said the interference went away while the breaker was off.

*From:* George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent:* Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:16 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5
If you're honest enough that testing doesn't mean permanent to 
you, then test away and nobody will notice or even care for the short 
amount of time that you're figuring something out.


On 10/26/2014 8:57 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

anybody?
testing is still not legal, right?
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com 
mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:


Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations
I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI
and the 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test
this link. I knwo it boils down to me being a dick about it, that
I dont question. But when it comes down to it, am I correct that
we cant even test outside our power restrictions? I know the
FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people overpowering a
radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its about
principle.
Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing
purposes? I assume that as a letter of law we would have to have
prior approval from the FCC, would we not?
(This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on
the way monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a
critical link to full capacity, which I did last year when I
specced out and sourced a licensed solution for the path)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af
af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so
im packing this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin
drinkin
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250
tel:%2B1-888-863-5250

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000

On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

yes I did

the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
I unlocket the full throughput eval now
its going above 5
but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on
every channel, on every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01
flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a ptp stay at
a single number like that
While we were peaking it out it was running up where
it was expected  aggregate around 19 or something
this didnt start until I switched bands
I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3
mile link
I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the
biggest channel, thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00
Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power
back to 27 from -4
5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it
corrupted the generic lite key or something like that
when its in the trial it ignores the key

anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
mailto:af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
mailto:m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000
tel:530.272.4000


On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come
across this
before? Was modulating higher. I switched to
5.4 then 5.2 then
back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[That One Guy via Af]

anybody?
testing is still not legal, right?

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations

 I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI and the
 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test this link. I knwo it
 boils down to me being a dick about it, that I dont question. But when it
 comes down to it, am I correct that we cant even test outside our power
 restrictions? I know the FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people
 overpowering a radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its
 about principle.
 Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing purposes? I
 assume that as a letter of law we would have to have prior approval from
 the FCC, would we not?


 (This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on the way
 monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a critical link to full
 capacity, which I did last year when I specced out and sourced a licensed
 solution for the path)

 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing
 this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000

 On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

 yes I did

 the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
 I unlocket the full throughput eval now
 its going above 5
 but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on
 every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a
 ptp stay at a single number like that
 While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected
 aggregate around 19 or something
 this didnt start until I switched bands
 I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
 I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, thats
 when it started 5.00 x 5.00
 Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
 5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

 Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the
 generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores
 the key

 anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

 Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


 On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


 I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
 before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
 back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
 the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[TJ Trout via Af]

Can you rob a bank, just to see what it feels like?

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 6:57 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 anybody?
 testing is still not legal, right?

 On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations

 I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI and the
 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test this link. I knwo it
 boils down to me being a dick about it, that I dont question. But when it
 comes down to it, am I correct that we cant even test outside our power
 restrictions? I know the FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people
 overpowering a radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its
 about principle.
 Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing purposes? I
 assume that as a letter of law we would have to have prior approval from
 the FCC, would we not?


 (This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on the way
 monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a critical link to full
 capacity, which I did last year when I specced out and sourced a licensed
 solution for the path)

 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing
 this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000

 On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

 yes I did

 the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
 I unlocket the full throughput eval now
 its going above 5
 but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on
 every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen 
 a
 ptp stay at a single number like that
 While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected
 aggregate around 19 or something
 this didnt start until I switched bands
 I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
 I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel,
 thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00
 Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
 5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

 Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the
 generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores
 the key

 anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

 Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


 On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


 I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
 before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
 back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
 the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do 
 not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af]

If you're honest enough that testing doesn't mean permanent to you, 
then test away and nobody will notice or even care for the short amount 
of time that you're figuring something out.


On 10/26/2014 8:57 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

anybody?
testing is still not legal, right?

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com 
mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:


Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations

I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI
and the 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test
this link. I knwo it boils down to me being a dick about it, that
I dont question. But when it comes down to it, am I correct that
we cant even test outside our power restrictions? I know the FCC
isnt driving around in vans looking for people overpowering a
radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its about
principle.
Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing
purposes? I assume that as a letter of law we would have to have
prior approval from the FCC, would we not?


(This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on
the way monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a critical
link to full capacity, which I did last year when I specced out
and sourced a licensed solution for the path)

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com
mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so
im packing this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250
tel:%2B1-888-863-5250

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000

On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

yes I did

the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
I unlocket the full throughput eval now
its going above 5
but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on
every channel, on every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01
flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a ptp stay at a
single number like that
While we were peaking it out it was running up where
it was expected aggregate around 19 or something
this didnt start until I switched bands
I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3
mile link
I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the
biggest channel, thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00
Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power
back to 27 from -4
5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it
corrupted the generic lite key or something like that
when its in the trial it ignores the key

anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
mailto:af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
mailto:m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000
tel:530.272.4000


On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come
across this
before? Was modulating higher. I switched to
5.4 then 5.2 then
back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any
channel size





-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must

remember that the parts you are reassembling were
disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
together again, there must be a reason. By all means,
do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must

remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled
by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there
must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM
maintenance manual, 1925




-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember

that 

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[Ken Hohhof via Af]

I think it’s like the “5 second rule”:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-second_rule
If you ask a group of moms if that’s true, you’ll be met with the same dead 
silence (and averted eyes).

Now turning off someone else’s equipment to see if it’s causing you 
interference, that’s taking “testing” liberties too far.  Which reminds me, I 
had another WISP do that to me, the funny thing is my equipment never actually 
went down, because there was a UPS on top of the grain leg, and they flipped 
the breaker at the bottom.  But they said the interference went away while the 
breaker was off.



From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:16 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

If you're honest enough that testing doesn't mean permanent to you, then 
test away and nobody will notice or even care for the short amount of time that 
you're figuring something out.

On 10/26/2014 8:57 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

  anybody? 
  testing is still not legal, right?

  On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations 

I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI and the 5.2 
band would have given me more output power to test this link. I knwo it boils 
down to me being a dick about it, that I dont question. But when it comes down 
to it, am I correct that we cant even test outside our power restrictions? I 
know the FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people overpowering a 
radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its about principle. 
Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing purposes? I 
assume that as a letter of law we would have to have prior approval from the 
FCC, would we not?


(This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on the way 
monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a critical link to full 
capacity, which I did last year when I specced out and sourced a licensed 
solution for the path)

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing 
this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

  On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000

On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

  yes I did

  the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
  I unlocket the full throughput eval now
  its going above 5
  but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on 
every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a ptp 
stay at a single number like that
  While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected  
aggregate around 19 or something
  this didnt start until I switched bands
  I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
  I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, 
thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00
  Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
  5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

  Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the 
generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores the key

  anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


  On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com 
mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

  Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

  Matthew Jenkins
  SmarterBroadband
  m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
  530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


  On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


  I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
  before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
  back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





  -- 
  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that 
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you 
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use 
a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925







  -- 

  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't 
get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a 
hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





-- 

All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[That One Guy via Af]

Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations

I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI and the 5.2
band would have given me more output power to test this link. I knwo it
boils down to me being a dick about it, that I dont question. But when it
comes down to it, am I correct that we cant even test outside our power
restrictions? I know the FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people
overpowering a radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its
about principle.
Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing purposes? I
assume that as a letter of law we would have to have prior approval from
the FCC, would we not?


(This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on the way
monday for not doing whatever it takes to get a critical link to full
capacity, which I did last year when I specced out and sourced a licensed
solution for the path)

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing
 this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000

 On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

 yes I did

 the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
 I unlocket the full throughput eval now
 its going above 5
 but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on
 every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a
 ptp stay at a single number like that
 While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected
 aggregate around 19 or something
 this didnt start until I switched bands
 I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
 I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, thats
 when it started 5.00 x 5.00
 Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
 5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

 Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the
 generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores
 the key

 anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

 Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


 On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


 I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
 before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
 back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[Matt Jenkins via Af]

Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000

On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this before? Was 
modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then back to 5.8 now it 
won't go above 5x5 on any channel size

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[That One Guy via Af]

yes I did

the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
I unlocket the full throughput eval now
its going above 5
but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on every
channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a ptp
stay at a single number like that
While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected
 aggregate around 19 or something
this didnt start until I switched bands
I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, thats
when it started 5.00 x 5.00
Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the generic
lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores the key

anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000


 On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


 I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this before? Was
 modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then back to 5.8 now it won't
 go above 5x5 on any channel size





-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[Matt Jenkins via Af]

I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000

On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

yes I did

the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
I unlocket the full throughput eval now
its going above 5
but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on 
every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never 
seen a ptp stay at a single number like that
While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected 
 aggregate around 19 or something

this didnt start until I switched bands
I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, 
thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00

Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the 
generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it 
ignores the key


anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com 
mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:


Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that 
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if 
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all 
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Re: [AFMUG] Help ptp650 stuck at 5x5

[That One Guy via Af]

my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing
this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000

 On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

 yes I did

 the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
 I unlocket the full throughput eval now
 its going above 5
 but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on
 every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a
 ptp stay at a single number like that
 While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected
 aggregate around 19 or something
 this didnt start until I switched bands
 I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link
 I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, thats
 when it started 5.00 x 5.00
 Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4
 5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size

 Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the
 generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores
 the key

 anybody know what happens if theres no good key?


 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com
 mailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

 Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?

 Matthew Jenkins
 SmarterBroadband
 m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net
 530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000


 On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:


 I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this
 before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then
 back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size





 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925