Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

Yes, but just like Wimax or Canopy you have to set a compatible configuration at each site. -- Original Message -- From: "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 4/10/2018 1:13:34 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync So do all sites use

Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

So do all sites use GPS to transmit at the same time then receive at same to reduce interference between sites? On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: > I haven't ever heard of anybody doing AAA in 3.65ghz... but yeah, I guess > that would work to just leave

Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

w Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> > To: "af" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 4/10/2018 10:23:29 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync > > I haven't ever heard of anybody doing AAA in 3.65ghz... but yeah, I guess > that would work to just leave huge gap

Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

> Sent: 4/10/2018 10:23:29 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync I haven't ever heard of anybody doing AAA in 3.65ghz... but yeah, I guess that would work to just leave huge gaps. Generally, as long as none of your clients can see more than one AP on the same channel you're fine,

Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

I haven't ever heard of anybody doing AAA in 3.65ghz... but yeah, I guess that would work to just leave huge gaps. Generally, as long as none of your clients can see more than one AP on the same channel you're fine, as far as self-interference goes (and that applies to pretty much any synced

Re: [AFMUG] LTE 3.65 and GPS Sync

You can still do ABAB. That AAA thing you're talking about is with three very narrow sectors. So that cell has huge gaps which are filled in from an adjacent cell. -- Original Message -- From: "Matt" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 4/10/2018 9:49:53 AM Subject: