Re: [AFMUG] Weird results from a SA

2016-10-18 Thread Bill Prince 

Satellite base station?

bp


On 10/18/2016 2:00 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

On 10/18/16 11:04, Ryan Ray wrote:

3600-3622 is another company. The 3650-3700 is totally clean when my
AP's are off.



How is someone legally using below 3.65 right now without the SAS 
database in place?


~Seth

Re: [AFMUG] Weird results from a SA

2016-10-18 Thread Ryan Ray 
Canada

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Seth Mattinen  wrote:

> On 10/18/16 11:04, Ryan Ray wrote:
>
>> 3600-3622 is another company. The 3650-3700 is totally clean when my
>> AP's are off.
>>
>
>
> How is someone legally using below 3.65 right now without the SAS database
> in place?
>
> ~Seth
>

Re: [AFMUG] Weird results from a SA

2016-10-18 Thread Seth Mattinen 

On 10/18/16 11:04, Ryan Ray wrote:

3600-3622 is another company. The 3650-3700 is totally clean when my
AP's are off.



How is someone legally using below 3.65 right now without the SAS 
database in place?


~Seth