Journalist/Publicist/Social Media Specialist/+12027069881
www.about.me/OralOfori
On Mar 4, 2015 3:15 PM, Ian Gilfillan wikimedi...@greenman.co.za wrote:
In order for an image to be accepted by Wikimedia Commons, it needs to
be explicitly freely licensed, or in the public domain. See
How Wikipedia rolls? How does it? Deleting legitimate articles and images
because someone at the other end dont know the true origin and considers
every celeb image on Wikipedia to be copyright?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 19:55 bobby shabangu bobbyshaba...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that one of your
Sorry Emmanuel, I didnt do English at school extensively, could you please
rephrase this statement?
But, as a
reminder: the owner of the copyright of a photography is the
photograph, not the subject who is photographed.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 20:12 Emmanuel Engelhart kel...@kiwix.org wrote:
Dear
Thanks Gilfillan for the email templates.
The word-for-word reason on the Patrick awauh article, perhaps I'm the only
one who cant count at least even 10 sentences matching word for word
between the Wikipedia article and the biography page.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 20:15 Ian Gilfillan
And those elephants, instead of spending time chasing the not so good
articles and high level crappy images on Wikipedia, they rather go on easy
prey and articles relating to celebs not well known, of course because
persons like myself are toothless and won't have anything to do.
Something I
Thanks for the links Ian, I'm however still confused about the thousands of
pictures used in Wikipedia from Flickr !! Do you know anything about that
??
Felix expect a follow up email from Theresa ( she'll be in contact with all
the user groups as well) to find out how far they are with the
