Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Help Get Microsoft to Implement RFC 6106 for Windows

2016-06-20 Thread Mukom Akong T.
On 20 June 2016 at 20:39, Willy MANGA wrote: > Do you know why these two has refused to implement them ? Mostly purist perspective that says "use RAs for everything" ___ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss@afrinic.net

Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Help Get Microsoft to Implement RFC 6106 for Windows

2016-06-20 Thread Carlos M. Martinez
As a data point, in our network we: - do run both SLAAC and DHCPv6 - we send RDNSS info over SLAAC - we do provide both IPv4 and IPv6 DNSes via DHCP (v4 and v6 respectively) Now it’s less so as we’ve been upgrading machines, but we used to get a significant amount of queries over v4 coming

Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Help Get Microsoft to Implement RFC 6106 for Windows

2016-06-20 Thread Daniel Shaw
> On 20 Jun 2016, at 9:59 PM, Mukom Akong T. wrote: > > Most of the complaints about deploying IPv6 to users have been around needing > to do both SLAAC and DHCPv6 in a normal network. Reasons being > > - Microsoft has refused to implement RFC 6106 (the ability to

[AfrIPv6-Discuss] Help Get Microsoft to Implement RFC 6106 for Windows

2016-06-20 Thread Mukom Akong T.
Most of the complaints about deploying IPv6 to users have been around needing to do both SLAAC and DHCPv6 in a normal network. Reasons being - Microsoft has refused to implement RFC 6106 (the ability to provision DNS information using RAs) in its Operating Systems - Google has refused to