That’s a sad scenario, Ben :
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> I guess whomever was paying the bills for that list (KurzweilAI?) got bored
> and stopped paying it...? On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Steve Richfield
> via AGI wrote: > I tried
Matt Mahoney via AGI wrote:
> 2. Intelligence grows logarithmically with CPU time and memory.
I don't remember, off the top of my head, which measure of intelligence
you claim grows with the logarithm of compute capacity.
However, any AGI system will be based on a heirarchy/heterarchy of
Until now, ALL sci fi, ALL philosophy, etc., has been "relative" - as seen
from another culture. I have been working on describing a "reference"
culture, to be used to understand and improve all past, present, and future
real world cultures, guide legislation to at least not make optimal
behavior
I tried posting on the Singularity forum, but it bounced. What is the story
here?
Steve
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ada390c367596a4-Mcb29e0ed3d1c9db66a1af505
Delivery options:
Among the many AGI designs and proposals mentioned in this thread, it was
refreshing to see some actual results from Peter Voss's Aigo. (Also
entertaining as my Alexa was listening and answering back while I played
the demo videos). Experimental results are a lot more work to obtain than
ideas,
Rob,
Yes, there can be different definitions of pattern, but only one wins in
the end. Generalization is a reduction.
My definition is a set of matching inputs. Similar to yours, except that
your "occurrence" implies binary is | is not, while my match is partial:
above-average similarity between
Boris
Thanks for the feedback. Our views are conceptually similar.
With regards pattern, I think various definitions are possible.
For example, in general pattern is regarded as an occurrence of 2 and more. In
other words, a one-to-many relationship could be viewed as a pattern. Thus,
