If we are living in a simulation, then P equals NP, I think. - Shashank On
Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:53:31 +0530 Mark Nuzz via AGI wrote
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote: Recursive self improvement in a closed
environment is not possible because intelligence
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote:
> Recursive self improvement in a closed environment is not possible because
> intelligence depends on knowledge and computing power. These can only come
> from outside the simulation.
>
>
I generally agree with this. But let's go into
Recursive self improvement in a closed environment is not possible because
intelligence depends on knowledge and computing power. These can only come
from outside the simulation.
Nor can any simulation model the outside world exactly because Wolpert's
theorem prohibits two computers from mutually
Please provide a link to the method you are talking about.
Jim Bromer
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 6:59 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via
AGI wrote:
> Convention is a language. The program has to find a way to understand what
> people say, and not say. It has to be able to learn the deeper
Being called a sock-puppet is a compliment? It does take ATM to believe
that.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:55 AM MP via AGI wrote:
> Wait... I don’t know if that’s a compliment or an insult.
>
> I do apologize that it seems odd someone would show ATM any shred of
> support, but his work is
Wait... I don’t know if that’s a compliment or an insult.
I do apologize that it seems odd someone would show ATM any shred of support,
but his work is fascinating to me. Extraordinarily cryptic as well. But there
are other projects I’m just as supportive of. Especially Kimera - but I’m
slowly
Hi everybody,
some of you may be interested in a philosophical / futurological paper in
which I propose a new “Temporal Singularity” as a special instance of the
Technological Singularity, that was accepted at AGI-18 and that I will
present there in August. The idea has interesting implications
Yeah, I thought that too. But this list is freak show, go figure.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:42 AM Giacomo Spigler via AGI <
agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote:
> Is it only me that thinks that MP is another email controlled by AT Murray?
>
>
> On Monday, June 25, 2018, MP via AGI wrote:
>
>> This
Is it only me that thinks that MP is another email controlled by AT Murray?
On Monday, June 25, 2018, MP via AGI wrote:
> This makes more sense than it should... quite interesting to say the
> least.
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:44 PM, A.T. Murray via AGI
>
