Re: [agi] Re: Fun with ChatGPT. How smart is it really?

2022-12-12 Thread Mike Archbold
It's progress. I think a lot of the nattering nabobs of AI negativity are blowing fuses criticizing it, but they miss the point. It still delivers on relatively mundane inquiries pretty reliably (seemingly). It's as reliable as the crap you read on anonymous message boards -- right now trust it no

[agi] Making a 3D game with chatGPT

2022-12-12 Thread immortal . discoveries
I thought let's try it and it worked great. Part 2 - watch first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doRFRPAOnbc Part 1, bit slower sry but just as amazing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1N72pNqCzQ=20s Ya know what...I remember...the first PART 1 on my YouTube, if you see the first

Re: [agi] Re: Fun with ChatGPT. How smart is it really?

2022-12-12 Thread Matt Mahoney via AGI
It is interesting how many times I've seen examples of ChatGPT getting something wrong but defending its answers with plausible arguments. In one example it gives a "proof" that all odd numbers are prime. It requires some thought to find the mistake. In another thread I saw on Twitter the user

Re: [agi] Re: Fun with ChatGPT. How smart is it really?

2022-12-12 Thread stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
On Sunday, December 11, 2022, at 7:39 AM, WriterOfMinds wrote: > And finally ... while it can present stock arguments for a point, the > attempts are mediocre, and I could do better. But it's doubtful how much the > people reading these actually care about the quality of the writing. As long >