Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-23 Thread rouncer81
indeed you are correct there maybe!   thats a cool thought. -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tc33b8ed7189d2a18-M89e7cd3ca1211eda355817b6 Delivery options:

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-22 Thread James Bowery
Another way that removing spurious order from data is beneficial: Parallel algorithms When I recently tried running cmix on the OBWB, I noticed it ran on only one core (and incredibly slowly). I'm not sure how the OBWB is organized but if it is a bunch of "articles" whose order conveys little

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-16 Thread rouncer81
order and meaning -> I throw a ball at you. you throw a ball at i.  Is the ball going to you or me? Maybe in different languages,  french ppl might read it the opposite of english ppl?  But I dont know I only speak 1 language. -- Artificial General

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-15 Thread rouncer81
If you want to reduce order from a string,  sort all the strings in alphabetical order,  when storing them and when accessing for them,  then the order will be taken out of the match. :) -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink:

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-15 Thread James Bowery
Right. The example is not so much to suggest a practical/significant improvement in the Hutter Prize as to address a general problem: Specification of information sometimes requires deliberately leaving out ordering information -- as in set literals like cats = set(fluffy, scruffy, paws, claws,

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-15 Thread Matt Mahoney
Removing the ordering constraint on enwik8 should reduce the compressed size by about 50K bytes, or 2 bytes per article. But it wouldn't affect the nature of the research. Here is more about the data. http://mattmahoney.net/dc/textdata.html On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 7:59 AM James Bowery wrote: >

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-14 Thread James Bowery
It is a respecification of the information to expose the spatial dimension of the corpus, while leaving the time dimension in tact. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:51 PM John Rose wrote: > Isn't that technically near-lossless? Leaving some tiny wiggle room? > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-14 Thread John Rose
Isn't that technically near-lossless? Leaving some tiny wiggle room? -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tc33b8ed7189d2a18-M015a0fcc662cec4713a2c2e4 Delivery options:

[agi] Parallel (Space Time) Kolmogorov Complexity?

2020-01-05 Thread James Bowery
In reality, sensors and effectors exist in space as well as time.  Serializing the spatial dimension of observations to formalize their Kolmogorov Complexity, so they conform to the serialized input to a Universal Turing machine, over-constrains the observations, introducing order not relevant