Re: [agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

Promise kept. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OluvmrZnA0A On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 02:46, Stefan Reich < stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote: > That paper is pointless. We should implement the test case. By the end of > tomorrow I will have an editor that solves the example. > > On Tue

Re: [agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

Papers are annoying to read and cannot be executed. Thus pointless. On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 06:36, James Bowery wrote: > The paper is pointless only to those without comprehension. > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions

Re: [agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

I think you might pass the Turing test. Congratulations - you're an A! :-') On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 10:07, wrote: > a := b > c := d > e := f > g := h > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > par

[agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

a := b c := d e := f g := h -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T76e694bfafa7b5f7-M03ee8f6016bff74d9bf5a871 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

[agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

The paper is pointless only to those without comprehension. -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T76e694bfafa7b5f7-Mbfb4c73110249a78809593b5 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscrip

Re: [agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

That paper is pointless. We should implement the test case. By the end of tomorrow I will have an editor that solves the example. On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 02:44, James Bowery wrote: > That's a good start but the plural form of "example" needs extension to > plurality and the "simple" needs to be m

[agi] Re: Proposed AI Tests

That's a good start but the plural form of "example" needs extension to plurality and the "simple" needs to be made general.  Fortunately, this was published in the early 60s: "A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference Part I " and "Part II