ive got an apology, i had an oversight, and i thought i had something i didnt.
sorry to say whoops, i hate it when i create a big load of excitement and
accidently send everyone on a fools errand, yet again. oh well. at least i
can say it now b4 its much more too late.
Metaphysics envy?
On 11/18/19, rounce...@hotmail.com wrote:
> do u even understand this? ockahms razor is a METRIC.
> you put ockhams razor on an evolving neural network because it fell swooped
> the task with less cells, it runs higher performance, PLUS! its actually a
> better
do u even understand this? ockahms razor is a METRIC.
you put ockhams razor on an evolving neural network because it fell swooped the
task with less cells, it runs higher performance, PLUS! its actually a better
understanding to generate further from.
Call it physics envy if you want, but you just labelled the best currently
working applied ai with an insult!
It *could* be computable, ppl dont know if p=np or not!
you seem to understand how occams razor can avoid just restoring the input
frames, via picking simplest model, i dont know if it
"Physics envy" is what we call the quest for a simple theory of AGI,
analogous to the simple set of equations in physics that explain everything
in the universe. Alas, Legg proved otherwise. There is no universal
prediction algorithm. If there were, it would be Occam's Razor, but it is
not
hang on - i thought Korrellan was talking about me? shit im getting paranoid...
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T28a97a3966a63cca-M7e08883946a35b8d70943b96
Delivery options:
Imagine if his standard model actually worked, it'd floor others once they got
it.
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T28a97a3966a63cca-M9c39f89bbec41e9d90dac559
Delivery options:
Absolutely the opposite. Even if I think something, I never rely apon it when
im with others.
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T28a97a3966a63cca-M046ccdf0fb78a6bbfdf42a3d
Delivery options:
If no one speaks up he will quote that everyone on this site agrees... semantic
games.
:)
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T28a97a3966a63cca-M8c2b5893180ea5842db6a337
Delivery options:
Things can only be standardized after the conception work is done. Since AGI
is highly experimental, this is trying to standardize something ppl cant even
do properly yet. Whats good about standards anyway, all it does is make us all
do everything the exact same way anyhow.
On Monday, November 18, 2019, at 8:21 AM, A.T. Murray wrote:
> If anyone here assembled feels that the http://ai.neocities.org/Ghost.html in
> the machine should not be universally acknowledged as the Standard Model, let
> them speak up now.
It's just so hard for us mere mortals to read the
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322123676_A_Standard_Model_of_the_Mind_Toward_a_Common_Computational_Framework_across_Artificial_Intelligence_Cognitive_Science_Neuroscience_and_Robotics
?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:22 AM A.T. Murray wrote:
> If physics can have a standard mo
If physics can have a standard model, then AGI should have one, too.
http://ai.neocities.org/AiTree.html is a candidate for Standard Model on
the basis of demonstrated existence-proof functionality such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-language_understanding and
http://ai.neocities.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
