Re: [agi] next gen AI

2023-10-18 Thread Danko Nikolic
Yes. There is quite some evidence. Here, I wrote a paper about the membrane proteins likely involved: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1476927123000117?dgcid=author If you do not have access to it, let me know and I can send you a copy. Danko Dr. Danko Nikolić

Re: [agi] next gen AI

2023-10-18 Thread Matt Mahoney
Do you have any experimental results with temporary connections in neural networks? It's an interesting idea but it needs to be tested for prediction accuracy on some benchmarks. On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 2:56 PM Danko Nikolic wrote: > Hi Matt, > > First, you should have gotten an A on your paper

Re: [agi] next gen AI

2023-10-18 Thread Danko Nikolic
Hi Matt, First, you should have gotten an A on your paper for such progressive ideas at the time. Second, if you ask these questions, this means that I have completely failed to explain my proposal. Had I managed to explain the idea, then you would have not asked those questions. So, Hebb's

Re: [agi] next gen AI

2023-10-18 Thread Matt Mahoney
How is your proposal different from Hebb's rule? I remember reading in the 1970s as a teenager about how neurons represent mental concepts and activate or inhibit each other through 2 kinds of synapses. I had the idea that synapses would change states in the process of forming memories. At the

[agi] next gen AI

2023-10-18 Thread Danko Nikolic
Here is my proposal on what connectionism is missing in order to reach a 'true" AI i.e., an AI that is much more similar to how the human brain works. This is a nine-minute video on the secret that was missing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVW6H4iCsTg_channel=dankonikolic I hope it is clear