Re: [agi] AI is too important...

2019-03-10 Thread Stefan Reich via AGI
> Computer science (CS) is so wrong about AI I probably agree, but I'd like to hear why exactly you think that? The term "AI" is an open term after all, that will be redefined as new ways of AI are found. On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 01:38, A.T. Murray wrote: > Computer science (CS) is so wrong

Re: [agi] AI is too important...

2019-03-09 Thread Mike Archbold
Well, philosophy doesn't change much anyway. On Saturday, March 9, 2019, A.T. Murray wrote: > Ah, a philosopher! That's what AI needs. I forgot to add this URL: > > http://old.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/az7nov/majoring_in_artificial_ > intelligence > > If you follow the above URL to the

Re: [agi] AI is too important...

2019-03-09 Thread A.T. Murray
Ah, a philosopher! That's what AI needs. I forgot to add this URL: http://old.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/az7nov/majoring_in_artificial_intelligence If you follow the above URL to the discussion on the AI subReddit, you may see that I have created the following new subReddit:

Re: [agi] AI is too important...

2019-03-09 Thread Mike Archbold
I majored in Computer Information Systems but took two philosophy electives. On Saturday, March 9, 2019, A.T. Murray wrote: > Computer science (CS) is so wrong about AI that it is not good to major in > CS for the sake of AI. Better to major in psychology, or philosophy or > foreign languages

[agi] AI is too important...

2019-03-09 Thread A.T. Murray
Computer science (CS) is so wrong about AI that it is not good to major in CS for the sake of AI. Better to major in psychology, or philosophy or foreign languages or anything that will teach you to think creatively. Artificial intelligence is too important to be left to the computer scientists.